← Library

Bamidbar Rabbah

Sefaria · Midrash > Aggadah > Midrash Rabbah · 444 sections

1. 1.1

   “The Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai, in the Tent of Meeting, on the first of the second month, in the second year of their exodus from the land of Egypt, saying” (Numbers 1:1). “The Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai” – that is what the verse said: “[Your righteousness is like the mighty mountains]; Your justice is like the great depths” (Psalms 36:7).1“Great depths” refers to punishment of the wicked. Rabbi Meir said: It is analogized to the righteous in their abode, and it is analogized to the wicked in their abode. It is analogized to the righteous in their abode: “In a good pasture I will herd them, and on the mountains of the height of Israel will be their grazing place” (Ezekiel 34:14). It is analogized to the wicked in their abode: “So said the Lord God: On the day that it descended to the grave I caused mourning; I covered the depths for it” (Ezekiel 31:15). With what are the wicked covered when they descend to the grave? It is with the depths. Ḥizkiya bar Rabbi Ḥiyya said: This vat, with what does one cover it? It is with an earthenware vessel, what it is from; just as it is from earthenware, so one covers it with earthenware. So it is with the wicked. What is written in their regard? “Their actions are in the dark, and they say: Who sees us and who knows of us?” (Isaiah 29:15). Because [their actions] are dark, the Holy One blessed be He sends them down to the grave, which is dark, and covers them with the depths that are dark, as it is stated: “And darkness upon the surface of the depths” (Genesis 1:2). That is, “Your righteousness is like the mighty mountains” – the righteousness that you bring upon the world is as conspicuous as these mountains. “Your justice is like the great depths” – the justice that You perform in this world; “the great depths” – just as the depths are concealed, so the justice that you effect is concealed. How so? When Jerusalem was destroyed, it was destroyed on the ninth of Av. When He shows it to Ezekiel, He shows it to him on the first of the month.2The prophecy in Ezekiel 26:1–2 references the destruction of Jerusalem. The date the midrash gives is the first day of the month, but it does not mention which month. The midrash is stating that God showed the Destruction to Ezekiel on a different day than it actually occurred. Why? It was so as not to reveal on which day it was destroyed. However, when He comes to exalt Israel, he reveals: which day, which place, which month, which year, which era: “[The Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai, in the Tent of Meeting, on the first of the second month, in the second year] of their exodus from the land of Egypt, saying” (Numbers 1:1). What did He say to them? “Take a census of the entire congregation of the children of Israel” (Numbers 1:2).

2. 1.2

   Another matter: “The Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai” – that is what the verse said: “You, the generation, see the word of the Lord: Have I been a wilderness for Israel or a land of deep darkness?…” (Jeremiah 2:31). The Holy One blessed be He said to Israel: ‘Because you said to Moses: “Why did you take us up from Egypt to die in the wilderness?” (Numbers 21:5). Was I like a wilderness for Israel; did I act with them like in the wilderness? The way of the world is that a king of flesh and blood who goes out to the wilderness, does he find tranquility there as he would find it in the palace, or eating or drinking? You were slaves in Egypt and I took you out of there; I lay you down on fine beds,’ as it is stated: “God led the people roundabout [vayasev] via the wilderness” (Exodus 13:18). What is vayasev?1 This root can also mean to recline on a bed. The midrash interprets vayasev as a verb meaning that he caused them to recline. It is that he lay them down in the manner of kings, recumbent upon their beds. Did I not place three caretakers for them: Moses, Aaron, and Miriam? Due to the merit of Moses you would eat the manna that the holy fathers did not see, as it is stated: “He fed you the manna that you did not know, and your fathers did not know” (Deuteronomy 8:3). Due to the merit of Aaron, I surrounded you with the clouds of glory, as it is stated: “He spread a cloud like a curtain” (Psalms 105:39). How many clouds of glory surrounded Israel in the wilderness? Rabbi Hoshaya and Rabbi Yoshiya: Rabbi Yoshiya said: Five; four in the four directions, and one going before them. Rabbi Hoshaya said: Seven; four in the four directions of the heavens, one above them, one below them, and one going before them at a distance of three days, and it would strike the snakes, the scorpions, the serpents, and the boulders before them. If there was a low place, it would elevate it; if it was an elevated place, it would lower it and render it a plain, as it is stated: “Every valley will be elevated, and every mountain and hill will be lowered” (Isaiah 40:4). The well was due to the merit of Miriam, who recited song at the sea, as it is stated: “Miriam called to them: Sing to the Lord” (Exodus 15:21), and regarding the water of the well: Then Israel sang this song” (Numbers 21:17). Rabbi Berekhya HaKohen said in the name of Rabbi Levi: A king of flesh and blood who has a province and he dispatched prominent people into it to conduct their affairs and administer their justice, who must be responsible for their sustenance? Is it not the residents of that province who must be responsible for them? But the Holy One blessed be He did not do so. Rather, he dispatched Moses, Aaron, and Miriam, as it is stated: “I sent before you Moses, Aaron, and Miriam.” (Micah 6:4), and yet, it was due to their merit that [the people] were sustained. The manna was due to the merit of Moses. Know that it is due to the merit of Moses; when Moses departed, “The manna ceased on the following day” (Joshua 5:12). The clouds of glory were due to the merit of Aaron. From where do we derive it? When Aaron departed, what is written: “The spirit of the people became restive on the way” (Numbers 21:4), as the sun was beating down on them. The well was due to the merit of Miriam. What is written? “Miriam died there and was buried there” (Numbers 20:1). What is written thereafter? “There was no water for the congregation” (Numbers 20:2). Of what was the well constituted? It was a boulder. It was like a beehive, and it would roll and come with them on their journeys. When the banners would encamp and the Tabernacle would stand, that boulder would come and settle in the courtyard of the Tent of Meeting. The princes would stand over it and say: “Rise, well” (Numbers 21:17). Then I brought you the quails. “Have I been a wilderness for Israel” (Jeremiah 2:31) – did I conduct myself with you like a wilderness? Or was I “a land of deep darkness” (Jeremiah 2:31) – was it not I, by My own hand that I illuminated for you, as it is stated: “The Lord was going before them by day…[to illuminate for them]” (Exodus 13:21). Another matter: “Or a land of mapelya” (Jeremiah 2:31) – what is mapelya? Did I, perhaps, say to you that I am bringing good for you and I delayed it? Mapelya is nothing other than delay, as it is states: “But the wheat and the spelt were not struck, as they ripen late [afilot]” (Exodus 9:32).2The "p" in mapelya and the "f" in afilot represent the same Hebrew letter. No matter that the Holy One blessed be He said to Israel was lacking, as Joshua said: “Nothing of all the good things that the Lord spoke to the house of Israel was lacking; everything came about” (Joshua 21:43). “Why did My people say: We separated from You [radnu]; [we will not come to You any longer]?” (Jeremiah 2:31) – what is radnu? It is the language of the Mishna: One who removes [harodeh] hot bread.3Terumot 10:3. Israel said: When the bread is baked in the oven and removed from it, can it be affixed in the oven again? We were in His hand like in an oven, as it is stated: “An oven for Him in Jerusalem” (Isaiah 31:9), and He exiled us to Babylon. What more can He ask from us?4After the exile there were those who said that just as the baked bread cannot be returned to the oven, so too the exiled Israelites cannot be reconnected to God (Maharzu). Another matter: “Why did My people say: We separated from You [radnu]; we will not come to You any longer?” (Jeremiah 2:31) – what is radnu? It is just as it says: “For he ruled [rodeh] the entire region beyond the river” (I Kings 5:4). They said to Him: ‘You smashed the Temple, removed Your Divine Presence from us. What do you want from us? “We will not come to You any longer.”’ He said to them: ‘If only I were in the wilderness now. Where are all the miracles that I performed on your behalf?’ Likewise He says: “Would that I would be in the wilderness, in a wayfarers’ lodge, and I would leave my people…” (Jeremiah 9:11), where I would be lauded, as it is stated: “Let the wilderness and its cities raise their voice, the villages that Kedar inhabits; rock dwellers will sing” (Isaiah 42:11). This is analogous to a prince who entered a province, and the residents of the province saw him and fled. He entered the second, and they fled from before him. He entered a city in ruins, and they greeted him and were lauding him. The prince said: This city is better than all the provinces. Here I will build a fine throne; here I will reside. So, when the Holy One blessed be He came to the sea, it fled from before Him, as it is stated: “The sea saw and fled” (Psalms 114:3), and likewise, “the mountains danced like rams” (Psalms 114:4). He came to the desolate wilderness; it greeted Him and lauded Him, as it is stated: “Let the wilderness and its cities raise their voice, with courtyards inhabited by Kedar; rock dwellers will sing.” He said: This city is better for Me than all the provinces. In it, I will build an inn and reside within it. They began rejoicing that the Holy One blessed be He resides in it, as it is stated: “Wilderness and wasteland will be glad, [and the desert shall rejoice]” (Isaiah 35:1).

3. 1.3

   Another matter: “The Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai” – Before the Tent of Meeting stood, He spoke with him at the bush, as it is stated: “God called to him from within the bush” (Exodus 3:4). Then, “God said to Moses and Aaron in the land of Egypt, saying.” (Exodus 12:1) He spoke with him in Midian, as it is stated: “The Lord spoke to Moses in Midian” (Exodus 4:19). He spoke to him in Sinai, as it is stated: “The Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai…saying.” Once the Tent of Meeting stood, He said: Modesty [tzeniut] is preferable, as it is stated: “And to walk humbly [hatzne’a] with your God” (Micah 6:8) – He speaks with him in the Tent of Meeting. Likewise, David said: “All of the glory of a king’s daughter is within, her dress interwoven with gold” (Psalms 45:14). “A king’s daughter” – this is Moses, as it is stated: “I will deliver Egypt into the hand of a harsh master” (Isaiah 19:4) – these are the plagues that came upon Egypt. “And a strong [oz] king will rule over them” (Isaiah 19:4) – this is Moses, who was the king of the Torah, which is called oz, as it is stated: “The Lord will give strength [oz] to His people” (Psalms 29:11). Therefore, “all of the glory of a king’s daughter is within.”5Thus, the verse that implies that modesty is appropriate for the king's daughter refers to Moses, to whom God spoke from within the Tent of Meeting. “[All of the glory [kevudah] of a king’s daughter is within,] her dress interwoven [mimishbetzot] with gold” – this is Aaron, as it is stated: “You shall make settings [mishbetzot] of gold” (Exodus 28:13). From here they said: A woman who conducts herself modestly, even if she is an Israelite, is worthy to marry a priest and to produce High Priests, as it is stated: “Her dress interwoven [mimishbetzot] with gold.” The Holy One blessed be He said: This is My honor [kavod], that I will speak within. As it is stated: “When Moses went into the Tent of Meeting [to speak with Him]” (Numbers 7:89). Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: If the nations of the world would know how much the Temple benefited them, they would have surrounded it with fortifications to protect it, as it was more beneficial for them than it was for Israel, as Solomon prayed: “To the foreigner, as well, who is not of Your people Israel” (I Kings 8:41), and it is written: “You will act in accordance with everything that the foreigner calls to You” (I Kings 8:43). But when he comes to Israel, what is written? “May You grant to each man according to all his ways, as you know his heart” (II Chronicles 6:30) – if he was worthy of it, He would give to him; if not, He would not give to him. Do not say: The Temple [alone benefits all nations]; rather, were it not for Israel, rain would not fall, the sun would not shine, as it is due to their merit that the Holy One blessed be He brings wellbeing to the world. In the World to Come, the nations of the world will see Israel, how the Holy One blessed be He is with them, and they will come to cleave to them, as it is stated: “[So said the Lord of hosts:] In those days, ten men of all the languages of the nations will take hold; [they will take hold of the corner of the garment of a Judean man, saying: Let us go with you, as we have heard that God is with you]” (Zechariah 8:23).

4. 1.4

   Another matter: “The Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai” – that is what the verse said: “Your navel is a moon-shaped goblet” (Song of Songs 7:3); it is speaking of the Sanhedrin that was situated in the Chamber of Hewn Stone and is analogized to the navel. Why is it analogized to the navel? It is, that just as this navel is situated in the middle of the body, so, the Sanhedrin is situated in the middle of the Temple. “May it not lack blended wine [al yeḥsar hamazeg]” (Song of Songs 7:3) – what is “al yeḥsar hamazeg”? That there were never less than one-third of them. “Al yeḥsar hamazeg” – one who dilutes [mozeg] properly, dilutes with one-third of the cup wine and two parts water. So, the Sanhedrin would convene there from the daily morning offering until the daily afternoon offering, and no one of them would leave to tend to his own affairs. What would they do if one of them sought to leave? He would count; if there were twenty-three there, he would leave, if not, he would not leave.6The Sanhedrin had seventy members. Twenty-three is just under one third. Why? It is because it is written: “May it not lack blended wine [al yeḥsar hamazeg]” that one-third of them were never missing. Therefore, al yeḥsar hamazeg. “Your belly is a pile of wheat” (Song of Songs 7:3) – Israel was likened to a pile of wheat; just as this wheat enters the storehouse by number, so, the Holy One blessed be He said that Israel should be counted at all times.7This is a sign of importance. That is why it is stated: “Your belly is a pile of wheat.” But straw and stubble are not counted and not measured; so, the nations of the world were likened to straw and stubble, as it is stated: “Like stubble before the wind” (Psalms 83:14), and likewise: “The house of Esau to stubble” (Obadiah 1:18). Why? It is because the Holy One blessed be He derives no pleasure from them, as it is stated: “All the nations are as nothing before Him” (Isaiah 40:17). But Israel, the Holy One blessed be He derives pleasure from them; they recite Shema, pray, and bless the name of the King of kings, the Holy One blessed be He, every day. That is why they are counted at all times and that is why they were likened to wheat. “Your belly is a pile of wheat.”

5. 1.5

   “The Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai” – this is what the verse said: “He did not do so for every nation” (Psalms 147:20), and likewise: “He raised a horn for His people” (Psalms 148:14). This is analogous to a king who took a first wife and did not write her a marriage contract, divorced her, and did not write her a bill of divorce, and so to the second and to the third; he did not write them a marriage contract and not a bill of divorce. What, then, did he do? He saw a young orphan girl, well born, and he sought to take her as a wife. He said to his groomsman: ‘Do not act with her like with the first ones; she is well born, modest, and upright. Write her a marriage contract, [specifying] in which seven-year period, in which year, in which month, in which district,’ just as it is written regarding Esther: “Esther was taken to King Aḥashverosh, to his royal palace, in the tenth month, which is the month of Tevet, in the seventh year of his reign” (Esther 2:16). So, the Holy One blessed be He created the generation of the Flood, but He did not write when He created them. He eliminated them from the world, and did not write when He eliminated them, but only, “On that day all the wellsprings of the great depth were breached” (Genesis 7:11). Likewise, regarding the generation of the Dispersion and likewise regarding Egypt, He did not write when they were created and when they died. But when Israel stood, the Holy One blessed be He said: I will not act with these like those first ones. These are the descendants of the patriarchs, the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Go, write for them which month, how many days in the month, which year, which district, and in which city I raised their horn. “In the Tent of Meeting" – that is the district; “in the second year” – that is the year; “of the second month” – that is the month; “on the first of the month” – that is how many days into the month. The era was also written.8The era was, “of their exodus from the land of Egypt.” Why “take a census of the entire congregation of the children of Israel” (Numbers 1:2)? To realize what is stated: “He did not do so for every nation.” What did He do? “He raised a horn for His people” (Psalms 148:14).

6. 1.6

   “The Lord spoke to Moses” – happy is Moses that six hundred thousand were standing; the priests, the Levites, and the elders were all standing there, and from all of them He spoke only with Moses.

7. 1.7

   “The Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai” – why in the wilderness of Sinai? From here the Sages taught that the Torah was given with three elements: With fire, with water, and in the wilderness. With fire, from where is it derived? “Mount Sinai was all smoke, [because the Lord had descended upon it in fire]” (Exodus 19:18). In water, from where is it derived? It is as it is stated: “Indeed, the heavens dripped, indeed, the clouds dripped water” (Judges 5:4).9The verse is a reference to the giving of the Torah. In the wilderness, from where is it derived? “The Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai.” Why was it given with these three elements? It is, that just as these are free for all mankind, so, matters of Torah are free, as it is stated: “Ho, everyone who is thirsty go to water” (Isaiah 55:1).10“Incline your ear and go to Me; take heed and your soul will live” (Isaiah 55:3), a reference to Torah, is written two verses later. Another matter: “The Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai” – it is, that anyone who does not render himself like a wilderness, accessible to all, is unable to acquire wisdom and the Torah. That is why it is stated: “In the wilderness of Sinai.”

8. 1.8

   Another matter: “The Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai” – it was called six names: The mountain of God, Mount Bashan, Mount Gavnunim, Mount Moriah11From the continuation of the midrash it is clear that Mount Ḥamad should appear in the text rather than Mount Moriah., Mount Ḥorev, Mount Sinai. The mountain of God, because God sat there in judgment, as it is stated: “These are the ordinances [mishpatim]” (Exodus 21:1).12Mishpat can also mean judgment. Mount Bashan, as the Holy One blessed be He came there [ba sham]. Mount Gavnunim, the mountain that disqualified all the mountains, just as it says: “Or a hunchback [giben] or a dwarf [.… shall not approach to sacrifice the offerings of the Lord]” (Leviticus 21:20–21). Mount Ḥamad, because the Holy One blessed be He desired [ḥamad] to abide there, as it is stated: “The mountain that God desired for His abode” (Psalms 68:17). Mount Ḥorev, because a sword [ḥerev] was wielded upon it, as it is stated: “The adulterer and the adulteress shall be put to death” (Leviticus 20:10); the murderer shall be put to death” (Numbers 35:16).13Verses 17–18 contain this command as well. Mount Sinai, where the nations of the world became hated [nisne’u] to the Holy One blessed be He, and he issued a death sentence against them, as it is stated: “The nations will be entirely destroyed [ḥarov yeḥeravu]” (Isaiah 60:12). Rabbi Abba bar Kahana said in the name of Rabbi Yoḥanan: The nations will be destroyed from Ḥorev, as they received their death sentence.

9. 1.9

   Another matter: “The Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai” – He said to him: “Take a census [se’u et rosh]” (Numbers 1:2). The Holy One blessed be He said to Israel: I was not fond of any creature more than you; therefore I accorded you preeminence [telui rosh] and likened you to Me. Just as I have preeminence over all mankind, as it is stated: “Yours, Lord, is the greatness […and the preeminence over every head [vehamitnaseh lekhol lerosh]]” (I Chronicles 29:11), so, I accorded you preeminence. That is why it is stated: Se’u et rosh, to realize what is stated: “He raised a horn for His people” (Psalms 148:14). Likewise it says: “The Lord your God will place you uppermost over all the nations of the earth” (Deuteronomy 28:1).

10. 1.10

    “All those counted were six hundred three thousand, five hundred and fifty” (Numbers 1:46). “All those counted were six hundred [three] thousand [five hundred and fifty]” – you find that this census equals the census in which Israel was counted in the construction of the Tabernacle, as it is stated: “The silver of those who were counted of the congregation [was one hundred talents and one thousand seven hundred and seventy-five shekels, in the sacred shekel]” (Exodus 38:25).14A calculation of the number of half-shekels yields 603,550 people. That was in the first year, as when they received the Ten Commandments, Moses immediately ascended to receive the Tablets, they sinned with the act of the calf, and immediately they crafted the Tabernacle and it was erected on the first of Nisan in the second year, as it is stated: “It was in the first month during the second year, on the first of the month, that the Tabernacle was erected” (Exodus 40:17). When was this census? It was on the first of Iyar in the second year, as it is stated: “They assembled the entire congregation [on the first of the second month…from twenty years old and above, by their head count]” (Numbers 1:18). In that census in which he counted them when Israel departed from Egypt on the fifteenth of Nisan, how many were they? “Six hundred thousand men on foot, besides children” (Exodus 12:37). When he came to count them in the second year on the first of the second month, he found that they were an additional three thousand five hundred and fifty, but we do not know [regarding] these additional ones whether he counts them as twenty from the New Moon of Nisan of the second year from their exodus from Egypt, or whether he counts them as twenty from the New Year, which is the New Moon of Tishrei, and it is the first year from their exodus from Egypt. Go out and learn from the bases,15Most of the silver collected from the half-shekel each person brought was used for the bases of the boards of wood which served as the walls of the Tabernacle. as it is stated: “The silver of those who were counted of the congregation was one hundred talents.… One beka per head, one-half shekel” (Exodus 38:25–26). When did they bring the shekels? It was on the day after Yom Kippur, and in two mornings they brought the entire contribution to the Tabernacle, as it is stated: “They brought him more contributions morning after morning” (Exodus 36:3). If you say that they did not count those who departed from Egypt less than twenty years old, [because] they did not count them [in the census of those over] twenty until the month of Nisan of the second year; if so, you find among the shekels a surplus of three thousand five hundred and fifty shekels. Rather, what must you say? It is that they counted them as twenty from Tishrei, which is the New Year for the creation of Adam the first man. This is why it presented the tally in this manner, to inform us that although they entered one month into the second year from their exodus from Egypt, those who reached twenty years were not added in their tally beyond those who contributed for the bases of the Tabernacle; to inform you that they do not count them from Nisan, but rather from Tishrei.

11. 1.11

    “But the Levites by the tribe of their fathers were not counted among them” (Numbers 1:47). “But the Levites by the tribe of their fathers” – the verse comes to say: Because the Holy One blessed be He did not say to Moses initially that he should count the tribe of Levi, as you find that he did not enumerate a prince for the tribe of Levi when he enumerated the princes of the tribes, Moses too did not count it, as Moses said: Had it been the will of the Holy One blessed be He that I count them, He would have told me. That is why it is stated: “But the Levites by the tribe of their fathers were not counted among them,” as he did not wish to count them. Immediately, Moses was standing and wondering why the Holy One blessed be He did not command him to count his tribe, and he did not know whether he would count them or not. The Holy One blessed be He saw that he was wondering; He immediately explained to him why he did not command him to count. That is what is written: “The Lord spoke.… However, the tribe of Levi you shall not count…” (Numbers 1:48–49). Rabbi Pinḥas bar Idi said: What is written at the beginning of the book? “Take a census [se’u et rosh] of the entire congregation of the children of Israel” (Numbers 1:2). It is not stated, “Elevate the head,” “promote the head,” but rather se’u et rosh,16Se’u et rosh literally means “lift up the head.” like a person who says to the executioner: Remove the head of so-and-so. He thereby made an allusion. Why se’u et rosh? If they merit they will ascend to greatness, just as it says: “Pharaoh will lift up your head and restore you to your position” (Genesis 40:13). If they do not merit, they will all die, just as it says: “Pharaoh will lift up your head from upon you, and hang you on a tree” (Genesis 40:19). It was revealed before the Holy One blessed be He that they would all die in the wilderness, and their heads will be removed; therefore, the Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: “However, the tribe of Levi [you shall not count…] among the children of Israel” (Numbers 1:49). Among the children of Israel you shall not count them, but by themselves, count them. Why? The Holy One blessed be He said: If the tribe of Levi is counted with Israel and intermingles with them, the angel of death will come to kill Israel and the decree will be issued against them that they will not enter the land, but rather, they will die in the wilderness, as it is stated: “In this wilderness, your carcasses will fall, and all those of you who were counted in any of your censuses” (Numbers 14:29), and he will find the tribe of Levi intermingled with them and they will intermingle with Israel to die. That is why he did not count them with Israel, but rather separated them in the tally. And that is also why the language that is written regarding Israel, se’u et rosh, was not stated in their regard, but rather: “Count [pekod] the children of Levi” (Numbers 3:15).

12. 1.12

    Another matter: “However, the tribe of Levi you shall not count” (Numbers 1:49) – why were they not counted with Israel? It is because the tribe of Levi was the palace guard. This is analogous to a king who had several legions, and he said to his chief of staff: Go count the legions, except for the legion that stands before me. That is why the Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: “However, the tribe of Levi [you shall not count]…among the children of Israel” (Numbers 1:49). Among the children of Israel you shall not count them, but by themselves, count them, as it is not in keeping with the king’s honor that his legion should be counted with the legions. That is why Israel was counted by itself and the tribe of Levi was counted by itself. From where do you say that it is for that reason that He said it to him? It is because it is written thereafter: “And you, appoint the Levites over the Tabernacle of the Testimony…” (Numbers 1:50). When the Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: “However, the tribe of Levi you shall not count…” (Numbers 1:49), Moses grew afraid and said: Is there perhaps a disqualification in my tribe, due to which the Holy One blessed be He does not wish me to count them? The Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: I said so to you only to exclude them from the decree, so that they will not die with them. That is what is written: “And you shall not take a census of them [ve’et rosham lo tisa] among the children of Israel” (Numbers 1:49). Why? It is because the Levites are Mine: “The Levites shall be Mine” (Numbers 3:12, 45). As, anyone who draws Me near, I draw him near. They drew near to Me, as it is stated: “Moses…said: Whoever is for the Lord, come to me; and all the sons of Levi gathered to him” (Exodus 32:26). They drew Me near, and I draw them near: “The Levites shall be Mine.” Moreover, because they were found to be loyal to Me, as they observed my admonition: “You shall have no other gods…” (Exodus 20:3), therefore, they are worthy to be the trustees of My house. “And you, appoint the Levites [over the Tabernacle of the Testimony…and they shall encamp around the Tabernacle]” – likewise it says: “My eyes are on the faithful of the land; they will dwell with Me.” (Psalms 101:6). You find that anyone who is put to the test regarding a matter,17And he passes the test. the Holy One blessed be He loves him forever. As, you find regarding Joshua that he was put to the test with Amalek, and he performed there in accordance with the Torah and the mitzva, as it is stated: “Joshua weakened [Amalek and its people by sword]” (Exodus 17:13). The Omnipresent said to him: From your tribe, I will establish one who will exact retribution against Amalek forever: “From Ephraim came those who uprooted Amalek” (Judges 5:14). Saul, who was put to the test but did not properly fulfill his command, but rather: “Saul and the people spared [Agag…and all that was good, and would not utterly destroy them]” (I Samuel 15:9), He caused him to fall back [le’aḥorav], and his kingdom was taken from him: “After you [aḥarekha], Benjamin” (Judges 5:14). This tribe, too, I put them to the test, and they were found observant, and they gave their lives for sanctification of My name, as it is stated: “Each man, place his sword upon his thigh…[and each slay his brother, each his neighbor, each his relative]. The sons of Levi acted in accordance with the word of Moses…” (Exodus 32:27–28); “Who said of his father, and of his mother: [I did not see him, and his brothers he did not recognize, and his children he did not know, because they observed Your saying, and Your covenant they upheld]” (Deuteronomy 33:9). Here, too, I will draw them near and make them My palace guard, and I entrust My sanctity and the function of My house to them. That is what is written: “And you, appoint the Levites [over the Tabernacle of the Testimony]” (Numbers 1:50). Why? It is because they are loyal to Me. During its dismantling and its erecting, too, I do not want others to dismantle it and erect it, only them. That is what is written: “And when the Tabernacle travels, [the Levites shall dismantle it, and when the Tabernacle encamps, the Levites shall erect it]” (Numbers 1:51). Is it possible that the mitzva is incumbent upon the Levites, but if an Israelite did so it is permitted? The verse stated: “And the stranger who approaches shall be put to death” (Numbers 1:51). Likewise it says: I hate doers of perversity” (Psalms 101:3) – this is Israel that strayed from after the Omnipresent and crafted the calf, and the Holy One blessed be He despised them from being His trustees. Do not say that it was that Israel would not touch it [only] during the journeys, rather, also during the encampments, only the children of Levi would approach it. That is what is written: “The children of Israel shall encamp, each in his camp.… And the Levites shall encamp around the Tabernacle of the Testimony” (Numbers 1:52–53). Why do I caution them that Israel should distance themselves from the Tabernacle? It is so there would not be fury upon them, as they are unworthy to approach it. That is what is written: “And there will not be fury against the congregation of the children of Israel” (Numbers 1:53). But the Levites will protect it; that is what is written: “The Levites will protect the watch of the Tabernacle of the Testimony” (Numbers 1:53). “The children of Israel did according to everything that the Lord commanded Moses, so they did” (Numbers 1:54) – as they distanced themselves from the Tabernacle and provided room for the Levites to encamp around the Tabernacle.

13. 2.1

    “The Lord spoke to Moses and to Aaron, saying” (Numbers 2:1). “The Lord spoke to Moses and to Aaron, saying.” In eighteen places you find Moses and Aaron as equals, corresponding to the eighteen blessings. The three patriarchs, from there you find a fixed obligation that one prays three times daily. Abraham instituted the morning prayer, as it is stated: “Abraham arose early in the morning [to the place where he had stood before the Lord]” (Genesis 19:27). Standing is nothing other than prayer, as it is stated: “Pinḥas stood and prayed” (Psalms 106:30). Isaac instituted the afternoon prayer, as it is stated: “Isaac went out to stroll [lasuaḥ]” (Genesis 24:63). Siḥa is nothing other than prayer, as it is stated: “The prayer of a poor man when he is faint [and pours out his plea [siḥo] before the Lord]” (Psalms 102:1). Jacob instituted the evening prayer, as it is stated: “He encountered [vayifga] the place…” (Genesis 28:11). Pegia is nothing other than prayer, as it is stated: “And you, do not pray on behalf of this people…[and do not plead [tifga] with Me]” (Jeremiah 7:16). In eighteen places Moses and Aaron are paired. An allusion to the eighteen blessings; they correspond to the eighteen mentions of God’s name that are written in Shema Yisrael and in: “A psalm by David. Give to the Lord, sons of the mighty” (Psalms 29:1). The three patriarchs instituted that one prays three times daily, and Moses and Aaron [are paired in eighteen places], and from these eighteen mentions of God’s name we derived eighteen blessings.

14. 2.2

    “Each at his banner, with the insignias of their patrilineal houses, the children of Israel shall encamp; at a distance, around the Tent of Meeting, they shall encamp” (Numbers 2:2). “Each at his banner…,” that is what is written: “We will sing with joy at your salvation and raise banners in the name of our God…” (Psalms 20:6). Israel said before the Holy One blessed be He: ‘We are singing with joy at Your salvation, what You have done on our behalf in Your name’ – “we will sing with joy at Your salvation.” “The Lord saved [vayosha] Israel on that day” (Exodus 14:30). Vayivasha is written,1The letters of vayosha (saved somebody else) are the same as the letters of vayivasha (was himself saved). as it were, Israel is saved and it is as though He was saved. “And raise banners in the name of our God,” as the Holy One blessed be He affixed His name to ours and arranged us according to banners, as it is stated: “Each at his banner.”

15. 2.3

    The Holy One blessed be He loved them with a great love, as he arranged them according to banners like the ministering angels, so that they would be distinguishable. From where is it derived that it was love for Israel? It is as Solomon says: “He brought me to the banquet house, and his banner of love is upon me” (Song of Songs 2:4). Rabbi Abahu said: Why does the verse state: “He brought me to the banquet house…”? To what is the matter comparable? It is to a wealthy man who had a storehouse full of wine. He entered to check it and discovered that it was all vinegar. He came to leave the storehouse and discovered one barrel of fine wine. He said: ‘For me, this wine is as dear as a full storehouse.’ So, the Holy One blessed be He created seventy nations, and of all of them, He derived pleasure only from Israel, as it is stated. “He brought me to the banquet house.” From where is it derived that wine [yayin] equals seventy? Yod – ten, Yod – ten, and nun – fifty; that is seventy. Of all of them: “His banner of love is upon me.” Rabbi Yehuda says: “He brought me to the banquet house,” to the great wine cellar, this is Sinai, and Moses taught me Torah that is expounded in forty-nine aspects; “and his banner [vediglo]2Vav – 6, dalet – 4, gimel – 3, lamed – 30, vav – 6 = 49. of love is upon me.” Rabbi Ḥanina said: Initially, anyone who would point to the image of a king with his finger would be killed, but the children go to the study hall and point to the mentions of God’s name with their finger. God said: “His banner [vediglo] of love is upon me” – his finger [vegudalo]3These are the same Hebrew letters which appear in the word vediglo. is beloved by Me. Rabbi Yisakhar says: “His banner [vediglo] of love is upon me” – even a person who sits and engages in Torah study and skips [umdaleg] from halakha to halakha and from verse to verse, the Holy One blessed be He says: ‘It is dear to Me,’ – “His banner [vediglo] of love is upon me,” – his skipping [dilugo] is beloved by Me.4Even though he does not study in a methodical manner, his studying is beloved. Another matter, “and his banner of love is upon me.” The Holy One blessed be He said: ‘The nations of the world have banners, but only the banner of Jacob is dear to Me.’ That is what is written: “And his banner of love is upon me.” Another matter, “he brought me to the banquet house,” when the Holy One blessed be He appeared upon Mount Sinai, twenty-two myriads of angels descended with him, as it is stated: “The chariots of God are myriad, thousands upon thousands of companies” (Psalms 68:18), and they were all arranged according to banners, as it is stated: “Preeminent [dagul] among a myriad” (Song of Songs 5:10). When Israel saw that they were all arranged according to banners, they began desiring banners. If only we could be arranged according to banners like them. Therefore, it is stated: “He brought me to the banquet house, [and his banner of love is upon me],” this is Sinai, at which the Torah, which is likened to wine, was given. “And drink of the wine which I have mixed” (Proverbs 9:5); that is “to the banquet house,” this is Sinai. “And his banner [vediglo] of love is upon me,” they said ‘if only He would show great love to me.’ Likewise it says: “We will sing with joy at your salvation [and raise banners in the name of our God]” (Psalms 20:6). The Holy One blessed be He said to them: ‘How you have desired to be arranged according to banners, by your life, I will fulfill your wish’ – “May the Lord fulfill all your wishes” (Psalms 20:6). Immediately, the Holy One blessed be He informed Israel and said to Moses: ‘Go and arrange them according to banners, as they desired.’

16. 2.4

    “Each at his banner, with the insignias,” that is what is written: “Who is she who appears [like dawn, fair like the moon, pure like the sun, formidable like banners]” (Song of Songs 6:10). Israel was holy and great with their banners, and all the nations of the world look at them, wonder, and say: “Who is she who appears….” The nations say to them: “Return, return, the Shulamite” (Song of Songs 7:1); cleave to us, come to us, and we will make you governors, generals, commanders, lieutenants, commanders-in-chief. “Return, return and we will gaze [neḥze] upon you” (Song of Songs 7:1). Neḥze is nothing other than authority, as Yitro said to Moses: “You shall seek [teḥze] [from among all the people…and set over them as leaders]” (Exodus 18:21). “Return, return and we will gaze [neḥze] upon you.” And Israel says: “Why will you gaze at the Shulamite” (Song of Songs 7:1); what greatness are you according us? “Is it perhaps like the dance of the camps?” (Song of Songs 7:1). Can you, perhaps, accord us [greatness] like the greatness that God accorded us in the wilderness: “The banner of the camp of Judah” (Numbers 2:3), “the banner of the camp of Reuben” (Numbers 2:10), “the banner of the camp of Dan” (Numbers 2:25), “the banner of the camp of Ephraim” (Numbers 2:18). Can you do that for us? “Why will you gaze at the Shulamite”; what greatness are you according us? “Is it perhaps like the dance of the camps”? Can you, perhaps, accord us [greatness] like the greatness that God accorded us in the wilderness, where we would sin and he would pardon us and say to us: “Your camp shall be holy” (Deuteronomy 23:15). Bilam, too, looked at them, and his eye came out on their account5This is an expression of extreme frustration. because he was unable to touch them, as it is stated: “Bilam lifted his eyes [and he saw Israel dwelling according to its tribes]” (Numbers 24:2); these are the banners. He began saying: ‘Who can touch these people, who know their ancestors and their families,’ as it is stated: “According to its tribes.” From here we learned that the banners meant greatness and protection for Israel; that is why it is stated: “Each at his banner.”

17. 2.5

    “Each at his banner,” that is what is written: “You are beautiful, my love, like Tirtza” (Song of Songs 6:4); as I accede [mitratze] to you. Alternatively, “like Tirtza,” you accede to Me. Alternatively, “like Tirtza,” that you gain acceptance through offerings, as it is stated: “So that it will be accepted [venirtza] for him, to atone for him” (Leviticus 1:4). “Lovely like Jerusalem” (Song of Songs 6:4), like those groups of ministering angels that fear Me and are wholly devoted to Me. “Formidable like banners” (Song of Songs 6:4); in what way are you like banners? With the banners that I gave you. David sees and says: “He did not do so to every nation” (Psalms 147:20), but rather to His people; that is what is written: “Each at his banner….”

18. 2.6

    Another matter, “each at his banner,” that is what is written: “He would find him in a land of wilderness…” (Deuteronomy 32:10); the Holy One blessed be He found a great finding in Israel, as it is stated: “Like grapes in the wilderness I found Israel” (Hosea 9:10); “He would find him in a land of wilderness,” the world was a wilderness until Israel departed from Egypt. “And in an empty, howling wasteland” (Deuteronomy 32:10); the world was emptiness and wailing. Until Israel departed from Egypt, and until they received the Torah, He did not do so.6Did not redeem the world, which was a wilderness. But when they departed from Egypt and received the Torah, what does [the verse] say? “He would encircle him, He would grant him understanding, [He would preserve them like the pupil of His eye]” (Deuteronomy 32:10). “He would encircle him,” that he surrounded them with clouds of glory. “He would grant him understanding,” that He caused them to understand the Torah. “He would preserve them,” happy are the ears that heard. To what extent did He love them, protect them, and preserve them? It was, as it were, to the extent of the pupil of his eye. See how He loved them, how He protected them, and how He preserved them, as God said to Moses: ‘Moses, say to them that they should craft a Tabernacle in their midst. As it were, I am leaving the supernal and descending and resting in their midst.’ Moreover, He arranged them according to banners in His name. The Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: ‘Arrange them according to banners in My name. Why? It is because they are My children, as it is stated: “You are children to the Lord your God” (Deuteronomy 14:1). And they are My hosts, and likewise it says: “I will take out My hosts, My people the children of Israel, from the land of Egypt” (Exodus 7:4). And likewise it says: “The banner of the camp of Judah, according to their hosts” (Numbers 2:3). Because they are My hosts, I will arrange them according to banners in My name.’ That is what is written: “Each at his banner.”

19. 2.7

    “With the insignias” – there were insignias for each and every prince: a banner with a color for each, and every banner like the color of the gems that were on Aaron’s heart,7The high priest wore the choshen, a breastplate which had on it twelve different precious stones, each with a name of one of the tribes (Exodus 28:15–21). from which the empire learned to make a banner, with colors for each and every banner. For each and every tribe, the prince’s banner was like the color of his stone. Reuben, its stone was a ruby and its banner was dyed red, and mandrakes were depicted on it. Simeon, [its stone was] a peridot, its banner was dyed green, and Shekhem was depicted on it. Levi, [its stone was] an emerald, its banner was dyed one-third white, one-third black, and one-third red, and the urim and tumim were depicted on it. Judah, [its stone was] a turquoise, the color of its banner was in its image, like the heavens, and a lion was depicted on it. Issachar, [its stone was] a sapphire, its banner was dyed bluish-black, and the sun and the moon were depicted on it, based on: “From the children of Issachar, possessors of understanding of the times” (I Chronicles 12:33). Zebulun, [its stone was] a clear quartz, the color of its banner, white, and a ship was depicted on it, based on: “Zebulun will dwell at the seashore, [and he shall be a shore for ships]” (Genesis 49:13). Dan, [its stone was] a jacinth, the color of its banner was like a sapphire, and a serpent was depicted on it, based on: “Dan will be a serpent” (Genesis 49:17). Gad, [its stone was] an agate, and the color of its banner was neither white nor black, but rather white and black intermingled, and an encampment was depicted on it, based on: “Gad will wage war by regiment” (Genesis 49:19). Naphtali, [its stone was] an amethyst, the color of its banner was similar to clear wine whose redness is not deep, and a hind was depicted on it, based on: “Naphtali is a hind let loose” (Genesis 49:21). Asher, [its stone was] a beryl, and the color of its banner was like the gem8Of that name. with which women adorn themselves, and an olive tree was depicted on it, based on: “From Asher, his bread is rich [shemena]” (Genesis 49:20).9The allusion to the olive tree is based on the fact that it produced olive oil [shemen]. Joseph, [its stone was] onyx, the color of its banner was exceedingly black, and it was depicted for two princes, Ephraim and Manasseh: Egypt, because they were born in Egypt.10The banners of Ephraim and Manasseh shared the same background. On the banner of Ephraim an ox was depicted, based on: “The firstborn of his bull [is his majesty]” (Deuteronomy 33:17); this is Joshua bin Nun, who was from the tribe of Ephraim. On the banner of Manasseh, an aurochs, based on: “And his horns are the horns of an aurochs” (Deuteronomy 33:17); this is Gideon son of Yoash, who was from the tribe of Manasseh. Benjamin, [its stone was] a chalcedony, the color of his banner was like all the colors of the twelve colors, and a wolf was depicted on it, based on: “Benjamin is a mauling wolf” (Genesis 49:27). That is why it is stated: “With the insignias,” as each and every prince had his own sign.

20. 2.8

    “Of their patrilineal houses” – it would have been necessary to say only: “Each at his banner, with the insignias, the children of Israel shall encamp.” Why does the verse [also] state: “Of their patrilineal houses”? That is what is written: “I will project my knowledge far and wide, and I will ascribe righteousness to my Maker” (Job 36:3). When the Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: ‘Arrange them according to banners as they desired,’ Moses began agonizing. He said: ‘Now dispute is destined to be introduced between the tribes. If I say to the tribe of Judah that it should encamp in the east, and it says: I want only in the south, and likewise Reuben, and likewise Ephraim, and likewise each and every tribe, what do I do?’ The Holy One blessed be He said to him: ‘Moses, why do you care? They do not need you. They recognize their abode by themselves. It is, rather, that they have a will in their possession from Jacob their ancestor, how to encamp according to the banners, I am not introducing anything new for them. They already have a protocol from Jacob their ancestor; just as they carried him and surrounded his bier, so they will surround the Tabernacle.’ As Rabbi Ḥama bar Ḥanina said: When Jacob our patriarch came to take leave of the world, he summoned his sons, as it is written: “Jacob summoned his sons” (Genesis 49:1). He blessed them and commanded them regarding the ways of God and they accepted the kingdom of Heaven upon them. When he completed his words, he said to them: ‘When you take me, accompany me with awe and honor. No other person shall touch my bier, not one of the Egyptians, and not one of your children, because you took wives from the women of Canaan.’ As it says: “His sons did to him as he had commanded them” (Genesis 50:12); his sons, but not the sons of his sons. “His sons carried him” (Genesis 50:13); how did he command them? He said to them: ‘My children Judah, Issachar, and Zebulun, shall bear my bier from the east; Reuben, Simeon, and Gad will bear my bier from the south; Ephraim, Manasseh, and Binyamin will bear [my bier] from the west; Dan, Asher, and Naphtali will bear [my bier] from the north. Joseph will not bear, as he is the king and you are obligated to accord him deference. Levi will not bear. Why? It is because he bears the Ark, and one who bears the Ark of the One who lives forever shall not bear the coffin of the dead. If you did so, and bore my bier as I commanded you, God is destined to encamp you according to banners.’ When he passed away, they bore him as he had commanded them, as it is stated: “His sons did to him as he had commanded them”(Genesis 50:12). That is: “I will project my knowledge far and wide, and I will ascribe righteousness to my Maker” (Job 36:3), as they had knowledge from Jacob as to how to encamp according to banners. “I will ascribe righteousness to my Maker,” this is the Holy One blessed be He, who performed beneficial actions for Israel. In order to grant them a beneficial action as reward for fulfilling their father’s command, he commanded them to encamp according to banners only in accordance with their father’s command. Righteousness is with them as he changed nothing, so as not to introduce dispute between them. That is why it is stated: “Of their patrilineal houses” – just as they surrounded their father’s bier, so they shall encamp. That is, “of their patrilineal houses, the children of Israel shall encamp.”

21. 2.9

    “At a distance, around the Tent of Meeting, they shall encamp” (Numbers 2:2). We learned there: One who begins Shabbat on the road creates for himself circles up to four cubits,11A person may not leave his "place" on Shabbat and go more than two thousand cubits. If he is on the road, and not in a town or city, his "place" is defined by the four cubits around him. He can walk two thousand cubits in any direction, and begins measuring from the edge of the circle. this is the statement of Rabbi Ḥanina. He may carry within four cubits and say: ‘My residence is in my place,’ and his place acquires for him two thousand cubits in each and every direction12He can carry within four cubits, and he can walk (without carrying) a distance of two thousand cubits. (Mishna Eiruvin 4:7–8). How much is four cubits? Rabbi Yehuda says: So that one may take an object from his feet and place it at his head (Yerushalmi Eiruvin 4:1). When one begins Shabbat in a province, even if it is as large as Antioch, he may walk it in its entirety, and outside of it two thousand cubits in any direction that he wishes. When one begins Shabbat in a cave, even if it is like Zedekiah’s cave that was eighteen mil, he walks it in its entirety and outside it two thousand cubits in any direction that he wishes (Tosefta Eiruvin 3:13). From where did they find a basis for Shabbat boundaries? From the Torah, as it is stated: “You shall measure outside the city: The eastern side two thousand cubits, and the southern side two thousand cubits, and the western side two thousand cubits, and the northern side two thousand cubits…” (Numbers 35:5).13See Mishnah Sota 5:3. Likewise you find regarding Joshua, when he went to destroy Jericho, Joshua said to them: ‘You are destined to observe Shabbat there, do not distance the Ark more than two thousand cubits in any direction. Why? It is so it will be permitted for you to pray before the Ark on Shabbat.’ Likewise it says: “However, there shall be a distance of a measure of two thousand cubits between you and it” (Joshua 3:4). Likewise you find that when the Holy One blessed be He said to Moses that Israel would be arranged by banners, He said to him: ‘Arrange them in each direction at a distance of two thousand cubits,’ as it is stated: “At a distance [mineged], around the Tent of Meeting, they shall encamp.” What is mineged? Rabbi Yitzḥak said: At a distance of a mil, which is two thousand cubits. From where is it derived that this mineged is at a distance of a mil? We derive a verbal analogy, mineged mineged.14Namely, the word mineged, which appears in the following two verses, create a verbal analogy. Here it is written: “At a distance [mineged], around the Tent of Meeting, they shall encamp.” And there it is written: “She went and sat herself down at a distance [mineged], at a distance [harḥek] of about a bowshot, for she said: I will not see the death of the child. She sat at a distance, raised her voice, and wept” (Genesis 21:16). Just as there it is a mil, so too here, it is a mil. From where is it derived that mineged that was said regarding Hagar is a mil? Here harḥek is written, and there raḥok is written; “however, there shall be a distance [raḥok] of a measure of two thousand cubits between you and it” (Joshua 3:4). Just as there it is a mil, here too, it is a mil.

22. 2.10

    “Those who encamp to the east, the banner of the camp of Judah, according to their hosts, and the prince of the children of Judah is Nahsḥon, son of Aminadav” (Numbers 2:3). “Those who encamp to the east, the banner of the camp of Judah…,” that is what is written: “The Lord founded the earth with wisdom, [established the heavens with understanding]” (Proverbs 3:19). The Holy One blessed be He created the four directions of the world: east, west, north, and south. East, from there light emerges to the world. West, the storehouses of snow, the storehouses of hail, cold, and heat emerge to the world. South, dews of blessing and rains of blessing emerge to the world. North, from there, darkness emerges to the world. Similarly, He surrounded His Throne with four beasts and, above them all, the Throne of Glory. Corresponding to them,15The four directions. the Holy One blessed be He arranged the banners for Moses. The Holy One blessed be He said to him: ‘Moses, the east from which light emerges to the world, Judah will correspond to it, as he is the possessor of the kingdom, as it is stated: “Those who encamp to the east, the banner of the camp of Judah” (Numbers 2:3). With it, the tribe of Issachar, which is a possessor of Torah, as it is stated: “From the children of Issachar, possessors of understanding of the times” (I Chronicles 12:33). Likewise it says: “And those who encamp with it, the tribe of Issachar” (Numbers 2:5). With it Zebulun, which is a possessor of wealth, as it is written: “Zebulun [will dwell] at the seashore, [and he shall be a shore for ships]” (Genesis 49:13). Likewise it says: “The tribe of Zebulun…” (Numbers 2:7). “All those counted for the camp of Judah…they shall travel first [rishona]” (Numbers 2:9), as the Torah is called rosh: “I was crowned from the distant past [merosh]” (Proverbs 8:23),16Torah here is a reference to Issachar. and it says: “For in the shadow of wisdom, in the shadow of money” (Ecclesiastes 7:12),17Money here is a reference to Zebulun. and it says: “Their king passed before them and the Lord is at their head” (Micah 2:13).18The king is a reference to Judah. You find that everywhere Judah is first: first for encampment, as it is stated: “Those who encamp [to the east, the banner of the camp of Judah]” – first for travel. As it is stated: “They shall travel first” (Numbers 2:9). For offerings, Judah is first, as it is stated: “The one who presented [his offering on the first day was Naḥshon, son of Aminadav, of the tribe of Judah]” (Numbers 7:12). For war, Judah is first, as it is stated: “Who will ascend first against the Canaanites for us…? The Lord said: Judah will ascend” (Judges 1:1–2). And one verse says: “The Lord said: Judah first” (Judges 20:18). When the herald19Who will announce the redemption of Israel. comes, Judah will receive the tidings first, as it is stated: “The feet of the herald are upon the mountains, announcing peace. Celebrate your feasts, Judah” (Nahum 2:1). That is from the east. The south, dews of blessing and rains of blessing emerge from it to the world. The tribe of Reuben will correspond to it, as he is a penitent. Penitence is a fine attribute, and the mercy of the Holy One blessed be He comes upon people when they repent. That is what is written: “The banner of the camp of Reuben is to the south…” (Numbers 2:10). With it, Gad, which was the possessor of a regiment, as it is stated: “Gad will wage war by regiment” (Genesis 49:19); Reuben with repentance, Gad with power, and Simeon in the middle to atone for it.20For the sin done with the daughters of Midyan at the Shitim (Number 25:1–9, 14–15). That is what is written: “And those who encamp with it, the tribe of Simeon” (Numbers 2:12), “and the tribe of Gad” (Numbers 2:14), “all those counted of the camp of Reuben…they shall travel second” (Numbers 2:16), as penitence is second to the Torah. After these two banners traveled, the Levites would transport the Tabernacle; that is what is written: “The Tent of Meeting, the Levite camp, shall travel [in the midst of the camps]” (Numbers 2:17). West, the storehouses of snow, the storehouses of hail, cold, and heat, and corresponding to them, Ephraim, Manasseh, and Benjamin. Who can withstand snow and hail? It is Ephraim, Manasseh, and Benjamin, as it is stated: “Rouse Your might before Ephraim, Benjamin, and Manasseh” (Psalms 80:3). The Divine Presence is always in the west, on the border of Benjamin, as it is stated: “Of Benjamin he said: The beloved, [the Lord will dwell in safety with him; He covers over him all the day, and He rests between his shoulders]” (Deuteronomy 33:12). That is what is written: “The banner of the camp of Ephraim according to their hosts is to the west…” (Numbers 2:18), “with it, the tribe of Manasseh…” (Numbers 2:20), “and the tribe of Benjamin, and the prince…” (Numbers 2:22), “all those counted for the camp [of Ephraim]…they shall travel third (Numbers 2:24). Strength is fitting for Torah and repentance, so that a person will strengthen himself in Torah and overcome his evil inclination. North, from there darkness emerges to the world, and corresponding to it, the tribe of Dan. Why? It is because it brought darkness to the world with idol worship. Yerovam crafted two golden calves, and idol worship is darkness, as it is stated: “Their actions are in the dark” (Isaiah 29:15). Yerovam circulated throughout Israel and it was only the tribe of Dan that accepted it from him, as it is stated: “The king consulted, and he crafted two golden calves…and he placed one in Dan” (I Kings 12:28–29). That is why the Holy One blessed be He commanded that Dan would encamp in the north. That is what is written: “The banner of the camp of Dan is to the north…” (Numbers 2:25). With it, the tribe of Asher, which illuminates the darkness, as it is stated: “And of Asher he said: Blessed…and he dips his foot in oil”21Oil is used to light up the darkness. (Deuteronomy 33:24). Likewise it says: “And those who encamp with it, the tribe of Asher” (Numbers 2:27). With it, Naphtali, who is filled with blessing in order to provide sustenance, just as it is written: “Naphtali, his desire is satisfied, [and full with the blessing of the Lord]” (Deuteronomy 33:23). Likewise it says: “and the tribe of Naphtali” (Numbers 2:29). “All those counted for the camp of Dan…they shall travel last by their banners (Numbers 2:31), as anyone who engages in idol worship goes backward and not forward. That is why it is stated: “The Lord founded the earth with wisdom, established the heavens with understanding”(Proverbs 3:19). Just as the Holy One blessed be He created four directions and four banners corresponding to them, so, too, He surrounded His throne with four angels: Mikhael, Gavriel, Uriel, and Refael. Mikhael was to His right, corresponding to Reuben. Why is his name called Mikhael? When Israel crossed the sea, Moses broke out in song: “Who is like You [mikhamokha]” (Exodus 15:11). When he concluded the Torah, he said: “Yeshurun, there is none like God [ein kael]” (Deuteronomy 33:26). Mi khamokha, ein kael, that is Mikhael. Uriel to his left, corresponding to Dan that was in the north. Why is his name called Uriel? It is because of the Torah, Prophets, and Writings with which the Holy One blessed be He atones for it,22For the tribe of Dan. and illuminates for Israel, as it is stated: “Arise, shine [ori], for your light has come [and the glory of the Lord has shone upon you]” (Isaiah 60:1). And David said: “The Lord is God [el], He has illuminated for us” (Psalms 118:27); that is Uriel. Likewise, it says: “Though I sit in darkness, the Lord is a light for me” (Micah 7:8). Gavriel before Him, corresponding to the kingdom of Judah, Moses, and Aaron, who were in the east.23The directions are defined relative to somebody facing east. Therefore, the front is east, the back is west, to the left is north and to the right is south. Why was his name called Gavriel? Regarding Judah, it is written: “For Judah prevailed [gavar] over his brothers” (I Chronicles 5:2), and regarding Moses, it is written: “He called to Moses” (Leviticus 1:1), and it is written: “He called his name Pele Yoetz El Gibor” (Isaiah 9:5). That is Gavriel. Refael, corresponding to Ephraim. Why was his name called Refael? It was in order to heal [lerapot] the breach of Yerovam, who emerged from Ephraim that is in the west. “God [el], please, heal [refa] her now” (Numbers 12:13).

23. 2.11

    “These are those who were counted of the children of Israel by their patrilineal house; all those counted of the camps according to their hosts were six hundred and three thousand, and five hundred and fifty” (Numbers 2:32). “These are those who were counted of the children of Israel by their patrilineal house…” In ten places Israel was counted: One, upon their descent to Egypt: “With seventy people, your ancestors descended to Egypt…” (Deuteronomy 10:22). One upon their ascent: “The children of Israel traveled from Rameses to Sukot, some six hundred thousand men on foot” (Exodus 12:37). One after the deed of the calf:24The sin of the Golden Calf. “When you take a census of the children of Israel…” (Exodus 30:12). Two in the book of Numbers; once with the banners, and once with the division of the land. Two in the days of Saul: “He counted them in Tela’im” (I Samuel 15:4), “he counted them in Bazek” (I Samuel 11:8); when they were wealthy, with these lambs,25The word tela’im is also the Hebrew word for lambs. According to the midrash they were not counted in a place called Tela'im, rather they were counted by means of lambs. and when they were poor, with these pebbles.26That is the translation of bazek. One in the days of David: “Yoav gave the sum of the number [mispar] of the census [mifkad] of the people [to the king]” (II Samuel 24:9). If mispar, why mifkad; if mifkad, why mispar?27Mispar and mifkad have similar meanings. Rather, he prepared two notes, a large sum and a small sum. The small one he showed to David; the large one he did not show him.28David and the people were punished for conducting the census. Yoav though that by keeping the larger sum from David, fewer people would be harmed. That is why it wrote et mispar mifkad. One in the days of Ezra: “The entire congregation together was forty[-two] thousand [three hundred and sixty]” (Ezra 2:64). And one in the future: “The flock will pass again under the hands of one who counts” (Jeremiah 33:13).

24. 2.12

    “These are those who were counted of the children of Israel….” That is what is written: “The number of the children of Israel will be like the sand of the sea…” (Hosea 2:1). “The number of the children of Israel will be,” that is what is written: “Forever, Lord, does Your word stand in the heavens” (Psalms 119:89). Because the Holy One blessed be He promised Abraham, and that promise came about when Israel departed from Egypt. When did the Holy One blessed be He promise him? It was when he said to him to depart from his father’s home, as it is stated: “Go from your land…I will render you a great nation…” (Genesis 12:1–2). Abraham said before the Holy One blessed be He: ‘Master of the universe, everything that you promised me, what benefit do I have from it, as I have no children,’ as it is stated: “Abram said: My Lord God, what will You give me, [ and I go childless?]” (Genesis 15:2). Abraham saw in his constellation that he was not destined to beget children. What did the Holy One blessed be He do for him at that moment? Rabbi Yehuda bar Rabbi Simon said that Rabbi Ḥanin said that Rabbi Yoḥanan said: It teaches that the Holy One blessed be He elevated him above the dome of the heavens and said to him: ‘Emerge from that constellation in which you see that you are not destined to beget, I will show you that you will beget children’ as it is stated: “He took him outside, and said: Look [habet] now toward the heavens [and count the stars, if you could count them, and He said to him: So shall be your descendants]” (Genesis 15:5). Rabbi Shmuel bar Rabbi Yitzḥak said: It says habet only when one is situated above, just as it is stated: “Look [habet] from Heaven and see” (Psalms 80:15). “He said to him: So shall be your descendants” (Genesis 15:5). What is “so shall be your descendants”? Rabbi Levi said in the name of Rabbi Yoḥanan: To what is the matter comparable? To one who embarked on a trip and walked the first day, the second day, the third day, until ten days, but did not find a city, an inn, a tree, water, or a creature. After he went ten days, he spotted a tree from a distance. He said: ‘Perhaps there is water beneath it.’ When he reached it, he saw that it was standing alongside a spring. When he saw that it was fine, it fruits were excellent, and its branches were fine, he sat himself down, cooled in its shade, ate of its fruits, and drank from the spring. It was pleasant for him and his strength was restored. When he arose to leave, he said to the tree: ‘With what can I bless you and what can I say to you? May your tree be fine? It is fine. May your shade be fine? It is already fine. May your branches be fine? They are fine. May your fruits be sweet? They are sweet. May a spring emerge from beneath your roots? A spring already emerges from beneath your roots. May you stand in a desirable place? You stand in a desirable place. With what can I bless you? Rather, may all the saplings that are produced from you be like you.’ So, when the Holy One blessed be He created the world, twenty generations lived and they were of no use, and no righteous person was produced from them. After twenty generations, the Holy One blessed be He saw Abraham, who was situated in the land of Babylon, that is called distant, as it is stated: “From a distant land…” (II Kings 20:14). The Holy One blessed be He said: ‘Will you say that he has the strength to endure?’ When they cast him into the fiery furnace, and he sanctified the name of the Holy One blessed be He, and withstood his ordeal, the Holy One blessed be He immediately drew him near to the land of Israel. He [Abraham] built him the inn, and would feed passersby, would bring people under the wings of the Divine Presence, publicized the glory of the Holy One blessed be He in the world, and attached his name29There is a reference to God's name within Abraham's name (Maharzu). to the name of the Holy One blessed be He, like the [names of the] angels. The Holy One blessed be He said to Abraham: ‘What can I say to you and with what can I bless you? May you be wholehearted, in that you shall be righteous before Me or that Sarah your wife will be righteous before Me? You are righteous and Sarah your wife is righteous before Me. Or that all the members of your household will be righteous before Me? They are righteous before Me. Rather, may all the offspring that are destined to be produced from you be like you.’ From where is it derived? It is as it is written: “He said to him: So shall be your descendants.” You find that Abraham was blessed with stars, as it is stated: “Look now toward the heavens, and count the stars…[so shall be your descendants]” (Genesis 15:5). Isaac was blessed with sand, as it is stated: “For I will bless you and multiply your descendants…[as the sand that is upon the seashore]” (Genesis 22:17). Jacob was blessed with the dust of the earth, as it is stated: “Your descendants will be as the dust of the earth….” (Genesis 28:14). The blessing of Abraham came about in the days of Moses, as, indeed, it is written: “The Lord your God has multiplied you, and, behold, you are today [as the stars of the heavens in abundance]” (Deuteronomy 1:10). The blessing of Jacob, who was blessed with the dust of the earth, came about in the days of Bilam, as, indeed, it is written: “Who counted the dust of Jacob” (Numbers 23:10). The blessing of Isaac, who was blessed with sand, came about in the days of Hosea, as it is stated: “The number of the children of Israel will be like the sand of the sea, which cannot be measured and cannot be counted; it will be that instead of it being said of them: You are not My people, it will be said of them: Children of the living God” (Hosea 2:1). Since it is regarding Isaac that the blessing of sand is written, it should have said: “The number of the children of Isaac will be.” But it does not say so, but rather, “the number of the children of Israel will be.” Why? It is, rather, that when Jacob our patriarch departed to go to Padan Aram, his father passed the blessing of sand to him, just as he said to him: “May He grant you the blessing of [et birkat] Abraham” (Genesis 28:4). What is et? Rabbi Ḥama bar Ḥanina said: This is what he said to him: ‘The blessing with which both I and Abraham were blessed; “for I will bless you [ki varekh avarekhekha]” (Genesis 22:17), a blessing for the father and a blessing for the son. “And multiply [veharha arbe],” multiplication for the father and multiplication for the son.’ “As the sand that is upon the seashore,” this blessing Isaac passed to Jacob. That is why it says: “The number of the children of Israel will be like the sand of the sea.” That is, “forever, Lord, does Your word stand in the heavens” (Psalms 119:89).

25. 2.13

    Another matter, “the number [mispar] of the children of Israel will be [like the sand of the sea, which cannot be measured and cannot be counted]”30There is an apparent contradiction. The beginning of the verse refers to a number, yet the continuation states that they cannot be counted, in which case there would be no number. – Rabbi Berekhya HaKohen the Great said: “The mispar…will be,” just as the scribe [sofer]31Moses. spoke of them in the Torah [kemesaper haTorah] he [Hosea] entreated on their behalf: “You will be blessed more than all peoples” (Deuteronomy 7:14). That is, “the number of the children of Israel will be like the sand of the sea.” It likened them to dust and it likened them to the stars. In this world they are likened to dust; just as the dust of the earth is made for trampling by all mankind, so Israel is made for trampling by all the nations of the world, as it is stated: “[The king of Aram] had destroyed them, and he rendered them like dust to be trampled” (II Kings 13:7). Alternatively, the dust of the earth; if it is not present, man cannot exist. If there is no dust there are no trees and there is no grain. So, if there is no Israel, the world cannot exist, as it is stated: “All the nations of the earth shall bless themselves by your descendants” (Genesis 22:18). In this world, they are likened to dust. In messianic times, they are likened to the sand of the sea. Just as sand typically damages one’s teeth, likewise in messianic times, Israel will eliminate all the nations, as it is stated: “One from Jacob will rule [and destroy the remnant from the city]” (Numbers 24:19), and it is written: “I will set My vengeance upon Edom by means of My people Israel” (Ezekiel 25:14). Another matter, why did it liken them to sand? Just as sand, if a person takes a handful from it and adds it to dough or to a cooked item, no person can taste it because it damages his teeth, so are Israel; anyone who plunders them or robs them in this world, he damages his teeth in the future. Why? It is because it [Israel] is sacred, as it is stated: “Israel is sacred to the Lord, the first of His crop; all its devourers will be guilty, evil will come upon them, the utterance of the Lord” (Jeremiah 2:3), and anyone who touches sacred items incurs liability to be put to death. Another matter, “like the sand of the sea,”; just as typically a person places sand into the fire and takes it out as chunks, and they craft glass vessels from it, so Israel enter into the fire and emerge alive, as it is stated: “[Then Nebuchadnezzar approached the gate of the burning fiery furnace and called:]…servants of God Most High, emerge and come” (Daniel 3:26). In the future, too, they enter Gehenna and the nations of the world enter there. They [the nations of the world] enter there and will perish, and Israel emerges from there in peace, as it is stated: “When you walk into fire, you will not be burned” (Isaiah 43:2). Why? “For I am the Lord your God, supporting your right, [who says to you: Do not fear, I will help you]” (Isaiah 41:13). That is why it is likened to sand. Regarding the future, it likened them to the stars; just as the stars shine in the entire firmament, so they will shine in the future, as it is stated: “The wise will shine like the radiance of the firmament, and those who lead the multitudes to righteousness, like the stars, for ever and ever” (Daniel 12:3). Why were they likened neither to the sun nor to the moon? It is, rather, Abraham is likened to the sun, Isaac is likened to the moon, and Jacob to the stars. In the future, the sun and the moon will be ashamed, as it is stated: “The moon will be disgraced and the sun will be ashamed, for the Lord of hosts will reign on Mount Zion and in Jerusalem and glory shall be before His elders” (Isaiah 24:23), but the stars will not be ashamed. So, Abraham and Isaac, their faces will turn pale32They will be embarrassed. in the future due to their sons; Abraham, due to Ishmael and the sons of Ketura, Isaac, due to Esau and his chieftains. But the stars have no shame, so Jacob has no shame, as he will not be ashamed, as it is stated: “Not now will Jacob be ashamed, not now will his face pale” (Isaiah 29:22). Why? “For upon his seeing his children, My handiwork” (Isaiah 29:23) that they are all righteous; “All of you is fair, my love” (Song of Songs 4:7). Another matter, just as the stars accord honor to one another, and there is peace between them, as it is stated: “He makes peace in His heights” (Job 25:2), so the righteous love one another. Just as the stars do not quarrel with one another, so it is with the righteous. Another matter, just as the stars dominate only at night, so Israel dominates only at night33Most of their Torah study is at night. due to the yoke of the kingdom. Another matter, just as the stars, one is capable of burning the entire world, so it is with the righteous, like Elijah, that fire descended at his word, as it is stated: “If I am a man of God, let fire descend from the heavens and consume you and your fifty. Fire descended from the heavens, and consumed him and his fifty” (II Kings 1:10).

26. 2.14

    “Which cannot be measured and cannot be counted” (Hosea 2:1). After He set a limit: “the number will be” (Hosea 2:1), He then says they have no limit, “which cannot be measured and cannot be counted”? It is, rather, that the Holy One blessed be He showed Hosea, just as He showed Abraham, and said to him: “Look now toward the heavens, and count the stars, if you could count them” (Genesis 15:5). What is this matter; “count the stars, if you could count them”? Does the one who said “and count” then say “if you could count”?34Would God tell them to count something that He tells them is uncountable? It is to inform you that he showed him by number: One, then two, then three, then twelve, then seventy, and then He showed him countless constellations. Why did He show it to him in that manner? He showed him a sign that He will multiply them in the world in that manner. He showed him one, as initially, he was alone in the world, as it is stated: “Abraham was one, and he inherited the land, but we are many and the land was given to us as a heritage” (Ezekiel 33:24), as he initially came to take refuge under the wings of the Divine Presence. He then showed him two, Abraham and Isaac. He then showed him three, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. He then showed him the twelve tribes. Then seventy, corresponding to the seventy people who descended to Egypt. Then He showed him the countless constellations, as Israel is ultimately destined to be fruitful and to multiply until they are not quantified, as it is stated: “The children of Israel were fruitful and propagated” (Exodus 1:7). To Hosea as well, He showed him by number and without number, as initially they were by number, and they were then fruitful without number. That is why it is stated: “Which cannot be measured and cannot be counted…” Another matter, in this world they have a number, as it is stated: “You will remain few in number” (Deuteronomy 4:27). But in the future, the children of Israel will be like the “sand of the sea, which cannot be measured and cannot be counted.”

27. 2.15

    “It will be that instead of it being said of them: [You are not My people, it will be said of them: Children of the living God]” (Hosea 2:1). Where was it said of them?35Where was it said, “You are not My people.” When they performed that action,36The making of the Golden Calf. the Holy One blessed be He called them Moses’ people, as it is stated: “Go, descend, as your people have become corrupted” (Exodus 32:7). Immediately, Moses girded his loins in prayer, as it is stated: “Moses implored the Lord his God…” (Exodus 32:11). This is analogous to a king who saw his wife kissing a eunuch.37One of the king’s servants. He said to her attendant: ‘I am divorcing her, I am casting her out of my house. Let her go to her father’s house.’ He said to him: ‘Why?’ He said to him: ‘Because I found her kissing a eunuch.’ He said to him: ‘Now she will produce for you fine and mighty sons, and they will descend with you to war.’38The attendant suggests that sons begat by the eunuch will be soldiers for the king. [The king responded] ‘There is no expectation from him, he will not beget for me.’ [The attendant said:] ‘Are you angry over a matter that does not involve any benefit?’ So, “Lord, why will your wrath be enflamed against Your people…” (Exodus 32:11). Moses said to him: ‘The calf that Israel crafted, does it assist You? Does it cause rains to fall and You produce the dews?’ The Holy One blessed be He said to him: ‘Is there any expectation from it?’ Moses said to Him: ‘If it has no substance, why are You angry?’ “Lord, why will your wrath be enflamed against Your people…Why will [Egypt] say…Remember Abraham…” (Exodus 32:11–13). What is written thereafter? “The Lord reconsidered the evil [that He had spoken to do to His people]” (Exodus 32:14). That is, “it will be that instead of it being said of them: [You are not My people, it will be said of them: Children of the living God].” Another matter, “it will be that instead…” – Rabbi Yoḥanan said: What is written before the matter? “Go, take for yourself a wife of licentiousness…He went and took Gomer, …and she conceived and bore him a son” (Hosea 1:2–3), and the entire matter.39Consider the whole episode of Gomer, which is found in Hosea. “Call his name Not My People, as you are not My people” (Hosea 1:9), and then, “it will be that instead of it being said of them: [You are not My people, it will be said of them: Children of the living God]” (Hosea 2:1). If, when He was angry at them, He was so fond of them; when he loves them, all the more so. To what is the matter comparable? It is to a king who became angry at his wife. He said: ‘I am divorcing her and I will not have mercy on her children. She is not my wife and I am not her husband.’ He went down to the marketplace and went to the goldsmith. He said to him: ‘Craft gold jewelry for my wife.’ His friend went and found him at the goldsmith who had crafted jewelry for his wife. He went and told her neighbors: ‘Have you not heard that the king is quarreling with his wife and he is saying in her regard: I am divorcing her? Now, I saw him at the goldsmith saying to him: Craft jewelry for my wife.’ So, when the Holy One blessed be He became angry with Israel, He said to Hosea: “Take for yourself a wife of licentiousness…”; I will not seek her, “the land will stray…” (Hosea 1:2); I will have no mercy upon her, “call her name No Mercy” (Hosea 1:6); she is not Mine and I am not hers, “as you are not My people and I will not be yours” (Hosea 1:9). Hosea said to the nations of the world: ‘What do you think? Because He said to them these matters, “as you are not My people,” that He is angry at them? See what He says to them. What is written thereafter? “It will be that instead of it being said of them: [You are not My people, it will be said of them: Children of the living God].”’ Likewise, Isaiah says: “Hear, heavens and listen, earth, [as the Lord has spoken: I have reared children and raised them up and they have rebelled against Me]” (Isaiah 1:2), “Woe, sinful nation” (Isaiah 1:4). What is written thereafter? “Let us go now and reason together, [says the Lord; if your sins will be like scarlet, they will be whitened as snow; if they will be reddened like crimson, they will be like wool]”40Undyed wool, which is white. (Isaiah 1:18). “Wash, purify…[cease performing evil” (Isaiah 1:16). To what is this matter comparable? It is to the son of a king to whom his father said: ‘Go to school.’ He went to the marketplace and he began playing with the lads. His father knew that he had not gone to school. He cursed him and sounded words of reprimand. Then he said to him: ‘Wash your hands and come dine with me.’ So, Isaiah said: “I have reared children…[and they have rebelled against Me].” When he concludes the entire matter, what does he say: “Let us go now and reason together, [says the Lord; if your sins will be like scarlet, they will be whitened as snow; if they will be reddened like crimson, they will be like wool].” Likewise Jeremiah, the Holy One blessed be He said to him: “What do you see, Jeremiah? I said: [I see] a branch of an almond tree” (Jeremiah 1:11), “a steaming pot…from the north evil will be released” (Jeremiah 1:13–14). What is written thereafter? “Go, and proclaim in the ears of Jerusalem, saying: [So said the Lord: I have remembered for you the kindness of your youth, the love of your nuptials]… Israel is sacred [to the Lord…]” (Jeremiah 2:2–3). This is analogous to a king who took a wife. He would say there is none fairer than she, there is none more praiseworthy than she, there is none more level-headed than she. Her attendant entered the house and saw her repulsive, the house untidy, the beds unmade. Her attendant said: ‘If only you would have heard how your husband has praised you in the marketplace. That praise is not consistent with these actions.’ The attendant said: ‘If when she is repulsive he praises her so, were she proper, all the more so.’ So, Jeremiah’s generation were sinners, and he says to them: “I have remembered for you the kindness of your youth…” (Jeremiah 2:2). Jeremiah said: ‘If only you would hear what He is saying about you: “Go, and proclaim in the ears of Jerusalem, saying: So said the Lord: I have remembered for you the kindness of your youth…Israel is sacred [to the Lord].”’ He said: ‘If when they are sinning so, He is fond of them, when they are performing His will, all the more so.’ Here, too, “you are not My people…” What is written thereafter? “It will be that instead […it will be said of them: Children of the living God]” (Hosea 2:1).

28. 2.16

    Another matter, “it will be that instead…” – that is what is written: “Many waters cannot extinguish love” (Song of Songs 8:7), and it says: “If a man would give [all the wealth of his house for love, he will be scorned]” (Song of Songs 8:7). Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman said: This verse is speaking of two loves; its beginning is referring to the love of Israel. Were all the nations of the world to assemble, to uproot the love that is between Him and Israel, they would be unable, as it is stated: “Many waters cannot extinguish love.” “Many waters” is nothing other than the nations of the world, as it is stated: “Woe, the uproar of many peoples, [like the roar of the seas will they roar; the din of nations will roar like the din of great waters]” (Isaiah 17:12). “And rivers cannot wash it away” (Song of Songs 8:7), these are their kings and their princes, just as it is stated: “Therefore, behold, the Lord is raising the mighty and abundant waters of the River [upon them, the king of Assyria and all his glory]” (Isaiah 8:7). Its end is referring to the love of Torah. Were all the nations of the world to assemble and say: ‘We are selling all our assets and fulfilling Torah and mitzvot,’ the Holy One blessed be He would say to them: ‘Even if you sell all your assets to acquire the Torah, it will be a disgrace [bizayon] for you’ – “If a man would give all the wealth of his house for love, he will be scorned [boz yavuzu lo]” (Song of Songs 8:7). For which love? For the love of Torah, as it is stated: “How I love Your Torah” (Psalms 119:97). They said to Him: ‘Why do You not accept us?’ He says to them: ‘Because you are sinners.’ They said to Him: ‘Are Israel not sinners?’ Rabbi Berekhya said: What is written thereafter? “We have a little sister, [and she has no breasts. What shall we do for our sister on the day that she will be spoken for?]” (Song of Songs 8:8). The Holy One blessed be He said to them: ‘Just as this child when she is small’ and she offends her parents, her parents do not become annoyed at her, why, because she is small, so it is regarding Israel; when they sin, the Holy One blessed be He does not hold it against them.’ Know that it is so, as in the days of Hosea, they angered the Holy One blessed be He, and the Holy One blessed be He began intimidating them: “As they are the children of licentiousness…” (Hosea 2:6), “as she is not My wife” (Hosea 2:4), “call his name Not My People, as you are not My people” (Hosea 1:9). He uttered it with His mouth momentarily, although He did so only to cause them to repent, and [because] He could not bear it even briefly, Therefore while He was still in His place, He recanted: “It will be that instead […it will be said of them: Children of the living God]” (Hosea 2:1). Rabbi Yitzḥak said: The Holy One blessed be He said to Israel: ‘I am first for good and last for evil.’ First for good: “I will say to Not My People: You are My people” (Hosea 2:25), and then: “he will say: My God” (Hosea 2:25). But for bad, I am last: “For you are not My people” (Hosea 1:9), and then: “I will not be yours” (Hosea 1:9). 41God calls Israel his nation to restore them before they call Him "our God," but when they are cast off, only after they stop being His nation and reject Him, He says "I will not be yours." Rabbi Ḥanina said: The unknowledgeable think that when He says: “I will not be yours,” He is saying that He is not a God for you. No, but rather, what is “I will not be yours”? Even though you are not My people, as you seek to separate from Me, “I will not be yours” – My thoughts are not the same as yours. Rather, perforce, you will be My people. Likewise it says: “What enters your mind will not be, that which you say: We will be like the nations…” (Ezekiel 20:32). Rather, what will I do to you? “As I live, the utterance of the Lord God, with a mighty hand, with an outstretched arm, and with outpoured fury, I will reign over you” (Ezekiel 20:33). You learn the love of Israel before the Omnipresent.

29. 2.17

    Another matter, “The number of the children of Israel will be…” (Hosea 2:1), Rabbi Avin HaLevi bar Rabbi began: “Everything by number and by weight…” (Ezra 8:34). Rabbi Avin said: All matters have a measure. Water has a measure, as it is stated: “Who measured the water in the hollow of his hand?” (Isaiah 40:12). The heavens have a measure, as it is stated: “And gauged the heavens with a span” (Isaiah 40:12). The dust has a measure, as it is stated: “And meted the dust of the earth with a measure” (Isaiah 40:12). The mountains have a measure, as it is stated: “And weighed mountains with scales” (Isaiah 40:12). Hills have a measure, as it is stated: “And hills with a balance” (Isaiah 40:12). All matters have a measure, as it is stated: “Everything by number and by weight.” The one who has neither weight nor measure is Israel, who have neither weight nor measure, as it is stated: “The number of the children of Israel will be like the sand of the sea [which cannot be measured and cannot be counted].” Just as the sand of the sea has no measure, the same is true for Israel. To what is this matter comparable? It is to one who knew three crafts; he was a goldsmith, a potter, and a glazier.42Of these types of craft, a goldsmith is considered the most sophisticated, the potter the lowest, and the glazier the middle. Anyone who was fond of him called him son of a goldsmith. Anyone who hated him called him [son] of a potter. Anyone who neither loved him nor hated him would call him [son] of a glazier. So it was with Moses; because he loved Israel, he likened them to stars, as it is stated: “Behold you are today as the stars of the heavens in abundance” (Deuteronomy 1:10). But Bilam, who hated them, likened them to dust, as it is stated: “Who has counted the dust of Jacob?” (Numbers 23:10). Hosea, who was neutral, he neither loved nor hated, likened them to sand, as it is stated: “The number of the children of Israel will be like the sand of the sea.” Another matter, “like the sand of the sea,” Israel was likened to sand and the nations to lime, as it is stated: “Peoples will be burnings of lime” (Isaiah 33:12). If you do not place sand with the lime, it has no endurance. So, if there is no Israel, the nations of the world would be unable to endure. So you find that were it not for Joseph, Egypt would have been lost in the famine. Likewise, were it not for Daniel, the wise men of Babylon would have been lost. Rabbi Menaḥma in the name of Rabbi Beivai, Rabba in the name of Rabbi Eliezer ben Yaakov: Israel was likened to sand; just as this sand, you make a hole in it in the evening and in the morning, you find that it is filled, so all the thousands that were lost in the days of David were restored in the days of Solomon, as it is stated: “Judah and Israel were numerous, like the sand that is by the sea in abundance” (I Kings 4:20). Rabbi Elazar in the name of Rabbi Yosei ban Zimra: Any time that Israel was counted for a purpose, they did not suffer a loss; for no purpose, they suffered a loss. Which is the time that they were counted for a purpose? It was in the days of Moses, with the banners and in the distribution of the land. For no purpose, it was in the days of David.

30. 2.18

    “Which cannot be measured and cannot be counted,” Rabbi Simlai said: What is this matter? Does one who says that they have a number then say that there is no number – “cannot be measured and cannot be counted”? Rather, when they are not performing the will of the Omnipresent, they have a number, as they are no fewer than six hundred thousand; “the number will be” [then there will be a number]. When they are performing the will of the Omnipresent, they have no number, but rather, “which cannot be measured and cannot be counted.” Another matter, “which cannot be measured and cannot be counted,” Rabbi Simon said in the name of Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi: Does one who says that they have a number then say that there is no number; “cannot be measured and cannot be counted”? If they have no number, how do they have a number? When it says: “The son of the Israelite woman went out…” (Leviticus 24:10), “He brought his household near, by man; and Akhan, son of Karmi…was indicated” (Joshua 7:18), “The name of the man of Israel who was slain…Zimri son of Salu” (Numbers 25:14); these have a number.43The unrighteous have a number. The righteous cannot be counted. But the righteous, “which cannot be measured and cannot be counted.”

31. 2.19

    “These are those who were counted of the children of Israel…” (Numbers 2:32). Come and see how beloved Israel is before the Omnipresent, as the Holy One blessed be He wrote a tally of Israel four times in the context of the banners; twice individually44By tribe. and twice generally. In addition, he counted each and every banner generally and individually, in order to inform how beloved they are before Him. They are His hosts and He wishes to count them all the time, like a person who has a treasure of which he is exceedingly fond. He counts it and counts it again many times, in order to arrive at its total, and he will rejoice over each and every count. So, the Holy One blessed be He is joyful with the mention of Israel’s tally, saying: ‘I have such and such hosts in My world who perform my will,’ and He takes comfort in them. “And the Levites were not counted among the children of Israel, as the Lord commanded Moses” (Numbers 2:33). “And the Levites were not counted…[as the Lord commanded Moses].” Just as it says in Israel’s tally: “As the Lord commanded Moses” (Numbers 1:19), as there was joy before the Omnipresent because the Levites were not counted with them, so that they would not be eliminated with them in the decree.45They were not included in the punishment for the sin of the spies.

32. 2.20

    “The children of Israel did in accordance with everything that the Lord commanded Moses, so they encamped according to their banners, and so they traveled, each according to his families, by his patrilineal house” (Numbers 2:34). “The children of Israel did in accordance with everything that the Lord commanded Moses.” The banners are beloved before the Omnipresent, as He wrote in their regard: “As the Lord commanded Moses” (Numbers 2:33), just as it is written regarding the labor of the Tabernacle. “So they encamped according to their banners, and so they traveled, each according to his families, by his patrilineal house.” The verse tells that immediately, Israel was swift to fulfill the word of the Omnipresent regarding the banners, and did not hesitate to perform it. “The children of Israel did….” Where was Aaron? Rabbi Yehoshua bar Rabbi Neḥemya and Rabbi Levi bar Ḥayata in the name of Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba: When he came to establish their lineage, Israel said to him: ‘You are establishing our lineage? Before you come to establish our lineage, go and establish the lineage of Elazar your son. To whom is he married? Is it not to the daughter of Putiel?’ That is what is written: “Elazar, son of Aaron, took from the daughters of Putiel as a wife” (Exodus 6:25). When the Holy One blessed be He saw that they were disparaging him, He accorded precedence to the honor of Aaron relative to the honor of Moses. That is what is written: “These are the generations [toldot] of Aaron and Moses” (Numbers 3:1).

33. 2.21

    And these are the generations of Aaron and Moses on the day that God spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai (Numbers 3:1). Anyone with whom the Omnipresent engages to establish a nation or a family tree from him, the Omnipresent would also engage with him to write generations in his regard, as you find twelve instances of generations in the verses. The first: “These are the generations of the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 2:4); “this is the book of the generations of Adam” (Genesis 5:1); “these are the generations of Noah” (Genesis 6:9); “these are the generations of the sons of Noah” (Genesis 10:1): “these are the generations of Shem” (Genesis 11:10); “these are the generations of Teraḥ” (Genesis 11:27); “these are the generations of Ishmael” (Genesis 25:12); “Isaac” (Genesis 25:19); “Esau” (Genesis 36:1); “Jacob” (Genesis 37:2). These are ten generations with which the Holy One blessed be He engaged to create the world and to establish nations. And there are two people that the Omnipresent wrote their generationst, one for the royal dynasty and one for the priestly dynasty: “These are the generations of Peretz” (Ruth 4:18), to establish the royal dynasty from him, and “these are the generations of Aaron and Moses"(Numbers 3:1), for the priestly dynasty.

34. 2.22

    And these are the names of the children of Aaron, the firstborn Nadav, and Avihu and Elazar and Itamar (Numbers 3:2). “These are the generations of Aaron and Moses,” but the generations of Moses were not reckoned here. Why, then, is it stated: “The generations of Aaron and Moses”? It is due to the honor of Moses, to avoid diminishing his honor. “These are the names of the sons of Aaron: The firstborn, Nadav, [and Avihu, Elazar, and Itamar]…These are the names of the sons of Aaron, the anointed priests, whom he invested to serve as priests” (Numbers 3:2–3). That is what we said, that the verse engaged only with the priestly dynasty.

35. 2.23

    “Nadav and Avihu died before the Lord when they offered alien fire before the Lord in the wilderness of Sinai, and they had no children. Elazar and Itamar served as priests in the presence of Aaron, their father” (Numbers 3:4). “Nadav and Avihu died before the Lord.” In several places, the death of Nadav and Avihu is written: It teaches that there was sadness before the Omnipresent in their regard, as Aaron’s sons were beloved. Likewise it says: “I will be sanctified through those who are near to Me” (Leviticus 10:3). “When they offered alien fire,” Rabbi Akiva says: They died due to the offering, as it is stated: “When they offered alien fire.” Rabbi Yosei says: They died due to drawing near,46They entered the Holy of Holies. as it is stated: “When they drew near before the Lord” (Leviticus 16:1). Rabbi Elazar says: It was also due to drawing near. “An alien fire,” neither from the daily afternoon offering nor from the daily morning offering, but rather, lay fire,47As opposed to a holy fire. as it is stated: “An alien fire.” Bar Kappara says in the name of Rabbi Yirmeya bar Rabbi Elazar: Due to four factors Aaron’s sons died: Due to drawing near, due to the offering, due to alien fire…VaYikra Rabba, in Parashat Aḥarei Mot until “Many young donkeys have died and their hides have been spread over their mothers>.”48VaYikra Rabba 20:8–10.

36. 2.24

    Rabbi Yirmeya ben Elazar said: In four places,49Leviticus 10:1, 16:1; Numbers 3:4, 26:61. it mentions the death of Aaron’s sons, and in all of them it mentions their sin. Why to that extent? It is to inform you that they had committed only this sin alone. Rabbi Elazar HaModa’i said: Come and see how difficult the death of Aaron’s sons was before the Holy One blessed be He, as every place that it mentions their death, it mentions their sin. Why to that extent? To prevent the possibility of slander, so that people should not say: ‘They clandestinely committed corrupt actions and that was the reason they died.’ “Nadav and Avihu died before the Lord.” Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Did they die before the Lord? It teaches that it is difficult before the Holy One blessed be He when the children of the righteous die during their fathers’ lifetimes. “When they offered alien fire before the Lord,” Rabbi Yoḥanan of Yafo raised a question before Rabbi Pinḥas bar Ḥama in the name of Rabbi Simon: Here [in this verse] it says “before the Lord,” “before the Lord,” twice, but elsewhere50The same midrash appears in Midrash Rabba Acharei Mot 20:10 and was apparently copied over to here without correcting the references. In the context of Bamidbar it should say "Elsewhere [in this verse] it says “before the Lord,” “before the Lord,” twice, but here is says…" it says: “In the presence of Aaron their father,” once. This teaches that it was twice as difficult before the Holy One blessed be He as it was for their father.

37. 2.25

    “In the wilderness of Sinai.” Did they, in fact, die in the wilderness of Sinai? Rather, it teaches that they received their death sentence from Mount Sinai. That is what is written: “Against the noble of the children of Israel, He did not extend His hand” (Exodus 24:11). Rabbi Pinḥas said: From here [we learn] that they were deserving of the hand being extended [to punish them], as Rabbi Hoshaya said: Did cakes go up with them to Sinai that you say: “They beheld God and ate and drank”? (Exodus 24:11). Rather, it teaches that they feasted their eyes on the Divine Presence. “They beheld God” like a person who looks at another while eating and drinking. Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Actual nourishment, just as it says: “Life is in the light of the king’s countenance” (Proverbs 16:15). Rabbi Tanḥuma says: It teaches that they acted with arrogance, stood upright and feasted their eyes on the Divine Presence. Rabbi Yehoshua of Sikhnin said in the name of Rabbi Levi: Moses did not feast his eyes on the Divine Presence and benefited from the Divine Presence. He did not feast his eyes on the Divine Presence, as it is written: “Moses concealed his face, because he feared to look at God” (Exodus 3:6). And benefited from the Divine Presence, as it is written: “Moses did not know that his face was radiant upon His speaking with him” (Exodus 34:29). In reward for “because he feared” (Exodus 3:6), he was privileged to: “They feared to approach him” (Exodus 34:30). In reward for “to look [mehabit]” (Exodus 3:6), he was privileged to: “And beholds [yabit] the image of the Lord” (Numbers 12:8). Nadav and Avihu feasted their eyes on the Divine Presence and received no benefit from it. Why did they not die at that moment? This is analogous to a king who married [off] his daughter and found in one of the groomsmen a matter of infamy. The king said: ‘If I kill him now, I will compromise my daughter’s celebration. Tomorrow, my celebration will come. It is preferable during my celebration and not during my daughter’s celebration.’ So, the Holy One blessed be He said: ‘If I kill them now, I will compromise the celebration of the Torah, Tomorrow, My celebration will come. It is preferable during My celebration and not during the celebration of the Torah.’ That is what is written: “On the day of his wedding and on the day of the rejoicing of his heart” (Song of Songs 3:11). “On the day of his wedding,” this is Sinai, “and on the day of the rejoicing of his heart,” this is the Tent of Meeting.

38. 2.26

    “…and they had no children. Elazar and Itamar served as priests.” Rabbi Yaakov bar Aivu in the name of Rabbi Aḥa: If they had sons, they would have taken precedence over Elazar and Itamar, as whoever takes precedence for inheritance takes precedence regarding honor, provided that he conducts himself in accordance with the custom of his fathers. “Elazar and Itamar served as priests in the presence of [al penei] Aaron, their father.” Rabbi Yitzḥak said: During his lifetime; Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba said: After his death. According to the opinion of Rabbi Yitzḥak, who said during his lifetime, here, it is stated al penei and there it is stated al penei, as it is written: “Haran died al penei Teraḥ his father” (Genesis 11:28). Just as al penei stated there is during his lifetime, so, too, al penei that is stated here is during his lifetime. According to the opinion of Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba, who said after his death, here, it is stated al penei and there it is stated al penei, as it is written: “Abraham rose from al penei his dead” (Genesis 23:3). Just as al penei stated there is after death, so, too, al penei that is stated here is after his death. According to the opinion of Rabbi Yitzḥak, who said during his lifetime, if impurity befell Aaron, Elazar served; if impurity befell Elazar, Itamar served. There was an incident involving Shimon ben Kimḥit who went out to speak with the king of the Arabs, and a drop of saliva sprayed from his mouth onto his garments and impurified him. Yehuda, his brother, entered and served in his stead in the High Priesthood. That day, their mother saw her two sons as High Priests. The Sages taught: Kimĥit had seven sons, and all of them served in the High Priesthood. The Sages said to her: ‘What good deeds do you have to your credit?’ She said to them: ‘So help me, in all my days, the beams of my house never saw the hair of my head.’ They said: ‘All flour [kimḥa] is flour [kimḥin], but Kimḥit’s flour [kimḥa] is fine flour.’ They read this verse in her regard: “All the glory of the king’s daughter is within” (Psalms 45:14). According to the opinion of Rabbi Ḥiyya bar Abba who said: After his death, when Aaron died, Elazar his son served. When Elazar died, Itamar served. That is why it is stated: “Elazar and Itamar served as priests al penei Aaron, their father.”

39. 3.1

    “The Lord spoke to Moses, saying: Bring the tribe of Levi near and stand it before Aaron the priest, and they shall serve him” (Numbers 3:5–6). “Bring the tribe of Levi near” – that is what is written: “The righteous man will blossom like a palm tree; [like a cedar in Lebanon, he will grow tall]. Planted in the House of the Lord, [they will blossom in the courtyards of our God]” (Psalms 92:13–14). “The righteous man will blossom like a palm tree” – just as this palm tree, its shade is far removed,1From the trunk of the tree. so, the righteous, the granting of their reward is far removed from them, until the World to Come. Just as this palm tree produces juicy, nikolaos, and unripe dates, and produces thorns, so are Israel: there are Torah personalities among them, there are plain citizens among them, and there are ignoramuses among them. Just as on this palm tree there are unripe dates that do not enter the storehouse and it produces dates and they enter the storehouse, so, Israel, when they were in the wilderness, some of them entered the Land of Israel and some of them did not enter. Just as this palm tree produces dates and produces thorns, and anyone who seeks to steal dates, the thorns that are on it grip him, so are the righteous: anyone who does not protect himself from them, their bite is the bite of a snake, their sting is the sting of a scorpion, their hiss is the hiss of a serpent. And all their statements are like fiery coals. Another matter: Just as this palm tree has no waste, but rather, dates for eating, soft branches for extolment,2On Sukkot. hard branches for roofing,3The sukka. bast for ropes, leaves for a sieve, planks to roof the house, so are Israel: they have no waste, but rather, some of them are masters of Bible, some of them are masters of Mishna, some of them are masters of aggada, some are performers of mitzvot, some are givers of charity, and so on. Another matter: Just as this palm tree, its heart is directed upward,4The soft material at the heart of the trunk goes straight up and does not bend. so, Israel, their heart is directed to their Father in Heaven, as it is stated: “My eyes are always toward the Lord, for He takes my feet from the net” (Psalms 25:15). Another matter: Just as this palm tree has desire,5The fruit buds on the female trees are pollinated from the pollen in the flowers of the male trees. so, the righteous have desire. What is their desire? It is the Holy One blessed be He, as it is stated: “With my soul, I desired You at night; while my spirit is within me, I will seek You. For when Your judgments are on the earth, the inhabitants of the world learn righteousness” (Isaiah 26:9). Rabbi Tanḥuma said: There was an incident involving a certain palm tree that was standing in Ḥamtan but did not produce fruit. They pollinated it, but it did not produce fruit. The palm cultivator said to them: It sees a male palm from Jericho, and it desires it in its heart. They brought from it, and pollinated it, and it immediately began to produce fruit. So, the entire desire and the hope of the righteous is the Holy One blessed be He. Just as this palm tree does not produce fewer than three branches, so, Israel is never lacking three righteous ones in the world, like Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; Ḥananya, Mishael, and Azarya. Likewise it says: “I said: I will ascend the date palm, I will grasp its branches; and please may your breasts be like clusters of the vine, and the fragrance of your nose like apples” (Song of Songs 7:9).6In Shir HaShirim Rabba 7:9 this verse is explained as referring to Ḥananya, Mishael, and Azarya. Just as this palm tree has soft branches for extolment, hard branches for a sukka, even its bast is used for strengthening,7Making ropes and its wood for kindling, so [there are] in Israel the righteous, the upright, the pious, Torah personalities, and even their wayward are performers of acts of kindness. If so, just as this palm tree, one does not craft utensils from it, is the same true of the righteous?8They provide no benefit for people. The verse states: “[The righteous man will blossom like a palm tree;] like a cedar in Lebanon, he will grow tall” (Psalms 92:13).9Utensils are crafted from cedars. Rabbi Tanḥuma said: I asked it of Rav Huna and he said: We were in Babylon, and we would craft utensils, tables, and candelabra from it. If so, just as this cedar does not produce fruit, so the righteous do not produce fruit? The verse states: “The righteous man will blossom like a palm tree.” Just as the palm tree produces fruit, so the righteous produce fruit, as it is stated: “Say of the righteous that it is good, for they will eat the fruit of their deeds” (Isaiah 3:10). Just as the palm and the cedar, anyone who climbs to their treetop and does not protect himself, he falls and dies, so, anyone who comes and confronts Israel, ultimately, he will receive his just deserts at their hand. Know that it is so, as Sarah, because she was taken by Pharaoh one night, he and his household were struck with afflictions, as it is stated: “The Lord afflicted Pharaoh…” (Genesis 12:17). Just as the palm and the cedar are greater than all the trees, so, Israel is greater than all the nations, as it is stated: “For Mordekhai was great [in the king’s palace, and his renown spread in all the provinces] (Esther 9:4); “David became steadily greater” (II Samuel 5:10). Just as this palm, if it is uprooted, it has no replacement, so are the righteous: they have no replacements when they die, as it is stated: “But wisdom, where will it be found, and where is the place of understanding?” (Job 28:12). Another matter: “The righteous man [will blossom] like a palm tree” (Psalms 92:13) is speaking of the tribe of Levi, as they were righteous and they caused good deeds to blossom when Israel crafted the calf, as it is stated: “All the sons of Levi gathered to him” (Exodus 32:26). Therefore, the Holy One blessed be He exalted them in Israel, like this cedar, which is taller and greater in Lebanon than the rest of the trees. So, they are greater than all of Israel, as from all the tribes He selected only the tribe of Levi alone, to serve Him. That is what is written: “Planted in the House of the Lord” (Psalms 92:14). Rabbi Ḥanan ben Pazi said: While they are still saplings they are in the House of the Lord; these are the children while they are in school. Another matter: “Planted in the House of the Lord” (Psalms 92:14) – they would never move from the Temple. “They will blossom in the courtyards of our God” (Psalms 92:14) – these are the services.10The service done by the tribe of Levi in the Temple. Know that it is so, as it is stated: “Bring the tribe of Levi near.… They shall keep his commission” (Numbers 3:6–7).

40. 3.2

    Another matter: “Bring the tribe of Levi near…” (Numbers 3:6) – that is what is written: “Happy is one You choose and bring near” (Psalms 65:5). Happy is the man whom the Holy One blessed be He has chosen even if He did not bring him near, and happy is the man whom the Holy One blessed be He brought near, even if He did not choose him. Who is the one whom He chose? It is Abraham, as it is stated: “You are the Lord God, who chose Abram” (Nehemiah 9:7); but you did not bring him near, but rather, he brought himself near. Jacob, the Holy One blessed be He chose him, as it is stated: “For the Lord has chosen Jacob for Himself” (Psalms 135:4), and likewise it says: “Jacob whom I have chosen” (Isaiah 41:8); but you did not bring him near, but rather, he brought himself near, as it is stated: “Jacob was a wholesome man who resided in tents.” (Genesis 25:27).11Bereshit Rabba 63:10 states that the word “tents” is referring to the study halls of Shem and Ever, in which Jacob studied Torah. Moses, He chose him, as it is stated: “Were it not for Moses, His chosen” (Psalms 106:23), but He did not bring him near. Happy are those whom the Holy One blessed be He chose even though He did not bring them near. Come and see Yitro;12Shemot Rabba 27:2. the Holy One blessed be He brought him near but did not choose him. Raḥav13Ruth Rabba 2:1. the prostitute, He brought her near but did not choose her. Happy are those whom He brought near even though He did not choose them. A noblewoman asked Rabbi Yosei; she said to him: Does Your God bring near anyone He wants? He brought a basket of figs before her, and she was selecting carefully and selecting and eating. He said to her: Do you know how to select and the Holy One blessed be He does not know how to select? One whom He sees that his deeds are good, He chooses him and brings him near. Rabbi Neḥemya in the name of Rabbi Shmuel bar Rav Yitzḥak: Not everyone who is near remains near, and neither does everyone who is distant remain distant. There are those who are chosen, rejected, and brought near. There are those who are chosen, rejected, and not brought near. Aaron was chosen: “And chose it from all the tribes of Israel to be priests for Me” (I Samuel 2:28). He was rejected: “The Lord was incensed with Aaron” (Deuteronomy 9:20). And it is written: “And you, bring Aaron your brother near to you” (Exodus 28:1). Saul was chosen: “Have you seen that the Lord has chosen him” (I Samuel 10:24). He was rejected: “I have regretted that I crowned Saul…” (I Samuel 15:11). But he was not brought near: “I have spurned him from reigning over Israel” (I Samuel 16:1). David was chosen: “He chose David His servant” (Psalms 78:70). He was rejected: “The king set out with his entire household in his wake.… [The king set out,] and all the people in his wake, and they stopped at a remote house” (II Samuel 15:16–17). Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: They ostracized him; nevertheless, he accepted his ostracization; that is what is written: “David ascended the ascent of the Mount of Olives, weeping as he ascended, and his head was covered [and he walked barefoot]” (II Samuel 15:30). And he was brought near; Rabbi Yudan said: Ira the Ya’irite, David’s teacher, brought him near. That is what David says: “May those who fear You and who know [yodei] Your precepts turn to me.” (Psalms 119:79). It is written: Who know him [yodo];14Although the verse is read in the plural – those who know – the word know is written in the singular, thus implying that it is referring to a single individual who can be described as the one who knows Your precepts. Ira the Ya’irite was his teacher and brought him near. Rabbi Yehoshua of Sikhnin in the name of Rabbi Levi: They are six who were chosen: Priesthood, Levites, Israel, the royal house of David, Jerusalem, the Temple. Priesthood, from where is it derived? It is as it is written: “And chose it from all the tribes of Israel to be priests for Me” (I Samuel 2:28). Levites, from where is it derived? It is as it is stated: “For the Lord your God has chosen him from all your tribes” (Deuteronomy 18:5). Israel, from where is it derived? It is as it is stated: “The Lord your God has chosen you” (Deuteronomy 7:6). The royal house of David, from where is it derived? It is as it is stated: “He chose David His servant.” (Psalms 78:70). Jerusalem, from where is it derived? It is as it is stated: “[Jerusalem,] the city that I have chosen” (I Kings 11:32). The Temple, from where is it derived? It is as it is written: “I have chosen and sanctified this House” (II Chronicles 7:16). David said: Happy is one whom the Holy One blessed be He has chosen and happy is one whom He brought near. Who is doubly happy? It is one whom the Holy One blessed be He has chosen and brought near. Who is that? It is Aaron and Levi. Aaron, from where is it derived? It is as it is stated: “And chose it from all the tribes of Israel to be priests for Me” (I Samuel 2:28). From where is it derived that He brought him near? It is as it is stated: “And you, bring Aaron your brother near to you” (Exodus 28:1). Levi, the Holy One blessed be He chose him, as it is stated: “For the Lord your God has chosen him” (Deuteronomy 18:5). From where is it derived that He brought him near? It is as it is stated: “Bring the tribe of Levi near, and stand it.” In their regard, the verse says: “Happy is the one You choose to bring near to You to dwell in Your courtyards” (Psalms 65:5), just as it says: “They shall keep his commission, and the commission of the entire congregation…[to perform the service of the Tabernacle]” (Numbers 3:7). “May we be sated by the bounty of Your House, [the holiness of Your Temple]” (Psalms 65:5) – as they would eat all the tithes that were brought to the House, just as it says: “To the children of Levi, I have hereby given all tithe in Israel as an inheritance…” (Numbers 18:21).

41. 3.3

    “And stand it before Aaron, the priest, and they shall serve him” – they shall serve him in his service and he will appoint treasurers and overseers from among them. “They shall serve him” – in their regard the verse says: “My eyes are on the faithful of the land; they will dwell with Me. He who walks in the path of integrity, it is he who will serve Me…” (Psalms 101:6). “They shall keep his commission.… They shall safeguard all the vessels of the Tent of Meeting…” (Numbers 3:7–8) – they would encamp around the Tent of Meeting, and they would carry its vessels and load them. “You shall give the Levites to Aaron…” (Numbers 3:9) – is it perhaps that they shall serve him in his service, that they should perform his labor? The verse states: “I have hereby taken [the Levites]…and the Levites [shall be] Mine” (Numbers 3:12). “Given for the Lord” (Numbers 18:6) – they are given for the Lord to the priests, and not to perform his labor, as they were gatekeepers and singers, and safeguarded all the vessels of the Tent of Meeting, carrying them, and loading them. “You shall count Aaron and his sons, [and they shall observe their priesthood]” (Numbers 3:10) – just as the Levites were commanded, so, the priests were commanded regarding their service, and all of them by Moses. “The commoner who approaches shall be put to death” (Numbers 3:10) – this is the punishment.

42. 3.4

    “The Lord spoke to Moses, saying: I have hereby taken the Levites from among the children of Israel in place of every firstborn, first issue of the womb from the children of Israel, and the Levites shall be Mine. For every firstborn is Mine; on the day that I smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt I sanctified to Me every firstborn in Israel, from man to animal; they shall be Mine; I am the Lord” (Numbers 3:11–13). “The Lord spoke to Moses, saying: I have hereby taken…”: “I [vaani]” – joyfully, “hereby [hineh]” – willingly; the statement of Rabbi Yishmael. His students said to him: Our teacher, because it says: “I [vaani] am hereby [hineni] bringing the flood, water” (Genesis 6:17), do I hear that there is joy before the Omnipresent? He said to them: There is joy before the Omnipresent when those who anger Him are eradicated. Likewise it says: “With the good of the righteous the city exults…” (Proverbs 11:10); and it says: “You have broken the teeth of the wicked…” (Psalms 3:8); and it says: “Salvation belongs to the Lord…” (Psalms 3:9); and it says: “The Lord is King forever and ever; [nations have] perished [from His land]” (Psalms 10:16); and it says: “May sinners be eliminated [from the earth, and may the wicked be no more]” (Psalms 104:35); and it says: “And with the eradication of the wicked there is singing” (Proverbs 11:10). Rabbi Natan says: “I [vaani]” – I add to their love.15That is, God’s love for them. Hineh – joyfully; likewise it says: “Behold [hineh], he too is going out to meet you, and he will see you and rejoice in his heart” (Exodus 4:14). The Rabbis say: Everywhere that vaani is stated, it is, as it were, the Holy One blessed be He and His court. The paradigm of them all: “And the Lord [vadonai] spoke evil of you” (I Kings 22:23).16I Kings 22:19–22 contains a description of the heavenly court.

43. 3.5

    “In place of every firstborn, first issue of the womb from the children of Israel” – initially the service was performed by the firstborns. Because [the firstborns] sinned with the calf, the Levites merited to take their place because they did not err with the calf. “For every firstborn is Mine…” – just as it says: “Sanctify for Me every firstborn…” (Exodus 13:2), “They shall be Mine, I am the Lord.” Because it says: “I have hereby taken the Levites from among the children of Israel in place of every firstborn,” do I hear that from this day forward the firstborn are no longer sacred? The verse states: “They shall be”; it teaches that they require redemption.17Even though the firstborns were replaced by the Levites, they are still holy and they must be redeemed by giving five Shekalim to a priest.

44. 3.6

    “The Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai, saying” (Numbers 3:14). “In the wilderness of Sinai, saying” – that is what is written: “God settles individuals in a house” (Psalms 68:7). The Holy One blessed be He said: Even though people in this world were individuals, [I did not leave them as individuals]; rather, I made them fruitful and multiplied them and rendered them dynastic houses in which they would reside in this world. How so? David was an individual, and I rendered him a dynastic house, as it is stated: “House of David, so said the Lord” (Jeremiah 21:12). Aaron was an individual, and I rendered him a dynastic house, as it is stated: “House of Levi, bless the Lord” (Psalms 135:20); “house of Aaron, bless the Lord” (Psalms 135:19). Israel, too, were individuals, as it is stated: “Who is like your people Israel, one nation in the land…” (II Samuel 7:23), and God multiplied them, as it is stated: “The Lord your God has multiplied you” (Deuteronomy 1:10). That is, “God settles individuals in a house.” Another matter: “God settles [individuals in a house]” (Psalms 68:7) – a certain noblewoman asked Rabbi Yosei ben Ḥalafta; she said to him: Everyone agrees that God created the world in six days. From six until now, what does He do? He said to her: He elevates ladders and lowers ladders. So-and-so, who was wealthy, will become poor, and so-and-so, who was poor, will become wealthy, as it is stated: “The Lord impoverishes and makes wealthy…” (I Samuel 2:7). Rabbi Berekhya said: That is not what he answered; but rather, this is what he said to her: He makes matches in His world and says: So-and-so man will marry so-and-so woman, and so-and-so woman will marry so-and-so man, and He settles them in houses. She said to him: I can make one thousand matches in one day. Rabbi Yosei was silent and went on his way. What did she do? She brought one thousand slaves and one thousand maidservants and matched them with each other. She said to them: So-and-so man will marry so-and-so woman, and so-and-so woman will marry so-and-so man. When they entered with them at night, an altercation broke out between them, and they stood and struck each other. In the morning they went to her; this one’s head was wounded, and that one, his hand was injured. She sent for Rabbi Yosei and related the incident to him. He said to her: If this matter is insignificant in your eyes, it is as difficult before the Omnipresent like the parting of the Red Sea. That is what is written: “God settles individuals in a house.” What is “God settles individuals”? The Holy One blessed be He sits and judges them; He brings this one from this place and that one from that place and settles them in one house. “He joyously [bakosharot] leads out prisoners” (Psalms 68:7) – he takes them from their houses, bound against their will, and makes matches between them. “Bakosharot” – if they do not merit, they weep [bokhin], but if they merit, they sing [meshorerin].18This is a portmanteau of the words bekhi and shirot – weeping and singing. Another matter: “God settles individuals in a house” (Psalms 68:7) – that He makes a match for each and every one of them with a kindred soul. Another matter: “God settles [individuals in a house]” (Psalms 68:7) – one who marries a wife suitable for him, the Holy One blessed be He renders them houses. Individual [yaḥid] is nothing other than an expression of greatness, just as it says: “One of [aḥad] the people19This is an allusion to Avimelekh, the king. almost lay with [your wife]” (Genesis 26:10), and it says: “Who is like your people Israel, one [eḥad] nation in the land” (II Samuel 7:23). From them He produces sons, masters of Torah, who issue rulings to prohibit [osrim] and permit [umakhshirim]. That is, “He joyously [bakosharot] leads out prisoners [asirim]” (Psalms 68:7). “But the rebellious” (Psalms 68:7) – but one who does not marry a wife suitable for him, ignorant sons emerge from him. That is what is written: “Dwell in a parched land [tzeḥiḥa]” (Psalms 68:7). Tzeḥiḥa is nothing other than an expression of thirst, just as it says: “Parched [tziḥe] with thirst” (Isaiah 5:13). What the verse said, “parched,” is that they were thirsty, [meaning] without Torah, just as what is written: “Not famine for bread and not thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the Lord.” (Amos 8:11). Another matter: “God settles individuals [in a house]” (Psalms 68:7) – who was it? These are Amram and Yokheved, by virtue of whose merit “He joyously leads out prisoners” (Psalms 68:7) – these are Israel, who were enslaved in Egypt. What did the Holy One blessed be He do? He matched Yokheved with Amram, so that a redeemer would emerge from them and redeem Israel. Another matter: “God settles individuals [in a house]” (Psalms 68:7) – these are Israel, who descended as individuals with seventy people, and the Holy One blessed be He rendered them houses, as it is stated: “The children of Israel were fruitful and prolific…” (Exodus 1:7). “He joyously leads out prisoners” (Psalms 68:7) – because they distanced themselves from licentiousness, He took them out of Egypt. Likewise, Solomon says: “A locked garden is my sister, my bride; [a locked fountain, a sealed spring]” (Song of Songs 4:12). “A locked garden” – these are the virgins. “A locked fountain” – these are the married women. “A sealed spring” – these are the single women. The Holy One blessed be He said to them: Due to their merit, I am redeeming My children. That is what is written: “Your branches [shelaḥayikh] are a pomegranate orchard” (Song of Songs 4:13) – by merit of this, I have sent you out [shelaḥayikh]. “It was when Pharaoh sent out [beshalakh]” (Exodus 13:17) – that is, due to the upright [kesherot] women, Israel departed from Egypt. That is why it is stated: “He joyously [bakosharot] leads out prisoners.” Another matter: “He joyously [bakosharot] leads out prisoners” (Psalms 68:7) – what is bakosharot? When Israel departed from Egypt, they departed only at a propitious time [bakosharot]. Rabbi Akiva said: He took them out only in a month during which it was propitious to depart; not in Tamuz, due to the heat, and not in Tevet, due to the cold, but in Nisan, which is propitious for setting out on a journey, neither extreme heat nor extreme cold. If you say Tishrei, there are rainy seasons.20Tishrei is followed by the rainy season, when it is difficult to travel, whereas Nisan is followed by mild weather. That is bakosharot. Another matter: Bakosharot – Rabbi Elazar said: Bakosharot: Those who were weeping [bokhin], these are Israel and Moses: “Behold, a boy weeping” (Exodus 2:6), and likewise, “The children of Israel sighed…” (Exodus 2:23). They are singing [meshorerin] now, as it is stated: “Then Moses and the children of Israel sang” (Exodus 15:1); that is bakosharot. Another matter: Bakosharot – Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya said: There are weeping [bekhiya] and singing [veshira] here. The Egyptians were weeping because they were despoiled, as Israel despoiled them and emptied their houses, as it is stated: “They stripped Egypt” (Exodus 12:36). Israel was singing, as they were loaded with the spoils of their enemies. That is, bakosharot. Another matter: The master of a slave weeps because his slave fled before him. A slave sings because he was extricated from slavery. So, the Egyptians wept because Israel fled, as it is stated: “It was told to the king of Egypt that the people had fled” (Exodus 14:5). Israel was reciting song because they were extricated from slavery. That is bakosharot. Another matter: By virtue of what merit did Israel depart from Egypt? Rabbi Ḥilefai said: It is by virtue of the merit of Jacob, as it is stated: Bakosharot, as likewise, it says: “He strove [vayasar] with an angel and prevailed; he wept [bakha] and pleaded with him” (Hosea 12:5). Another matter: Bakosharot – our Rabbis say: It is by virtue of the women, the upright [hakesherot] matriarchs, as it is stated: Bakosharot. It is not written here bekhishron, but bakosharot,21In the feminine. the fair and upright. Another matter: Bakosharot – due to the upright [haksherim] who were in their midst, they departed. Who were the upright among them? This is the tribe of Levi, as although Israel were idol worshippers in Egypt, the tribe of Levi would worship the Holy One blessed be He and circumcise themselves. That is why Moses lauds them before his death, as it is stated: “Because they observed Your saying, and they upheld Your covenant” (Deuteronomy 33:9). That is, due to the upright who were in their midst, Israel departed from Egypt. Another matter: Bakosharot – by virtue of what merit did Israel depart from Egypt? Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: It is because the Holy One blessed be He foresaw that they are destined to craft a Tabernacle for Him, as it is stated: “They will know that I am the Lord their God, who took them out of the land of Egypt” (Exodus 29:46) in order “that I may dwell among them” (Exodus 29:46). That is, it was only by virtue of the merit of the Tabernacle that Israel departed from Egypt. By virtue of what merit did the tribe of Levi depart? Was it, perhaps, by virtue of the Tent of Meeting that they, too, departed? Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: No, it was by virtue of their own merit that they departed. Therefore, when he came to count Israel at the beginning of the book, He mentions the Tent of Meeting and the exodus from Egypt, as it is stated: “The Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai, in the Tent of Meeting” (Numbers 1:1), and it mentions immediately, “[in the second year] of their exodus from the land of Egypt” (Numbers 1:1), to inform you that Israel departed from Egypt only by virtue of the merit of the Tent of Meeting. But the children of Levi, who departed by virtue of their own merit, when it came to count them, it does not mention in their passage the Tent of Meeting, nor the exodus from Egypt. That is what is written: “The Lord spoke to Moses in the wilderness of Sinai…saying” (Numbers 1:1).

45. 3.7

    “Count the children of Levi by their patrilineal house, by their families; every male from one month old and above, you shall count them” (Numbers 3:15). “Count the children of Levi” – elsewhere it says: “However, the tribe of Levi [you shall not count]” (Numbers 1:49), and here it says: “Count the children of Levi.” Rabbi Yehuda bar Shalom said: For the benefit of the children of Levi they were not counted with Israel. As you find that the Israelites who departed from Egypt did not enter the Land, as it is stated: “Your carcasses will fall in this wilderness…” (Numbers 14:29). Had the tribe of Levi been counted with them, they would have been included in the decree, as this is what the Holy One blessed be He said: “All those of you who were counted in any of your censuses, from twenty years old…” (Numbers 14:29). But they were not counted with them, and they entered the Land. Why did they all merit entering the Land? It is because, just as they were righteous in Egypt, so they were righteous in the wilderness, and they gave their lives for the sake of the Holy One blessed be He. When did they do so? It was when Israel performed that act.22The sin of the Golden Calf. What is written: “Moses stood at the gate of the camp and said: [Whoever is for the Lord, come to me; and all the sons of Levi gathered to him]” (Exodus 32:26). Just as they stood in the days of Moses, so it was in the Land of Israel in the days of Joshua. They would teach Israel to worship the Holy One blessed be He, as it is stated: “Israel served the Lord all the days of Joshua [and all the days of the elders who outlived Joshua]” (Joshua 24:31). Who were these elders? Rabbi Yehuda HaLevi said in the name of our Rabbis: These were the children of Levi. Rabbi Berekhya ben Rabbi Ḥelbo in the name of Abba Semukeyad: They were Eldad and Medad. You conclude and say: They outlived Joshua. From where is it derived that the tribe of Levi entered the Land of Israel? It is as it is stated: “For the Lord said to them they will die in the wilderness” (Numbers 26:65) – these were Israel. “And no man remained of them except Caleb son of Yefuneh and Joshua son of Nun” (Numbers 26:65) – from the inference of the verse one learns that no man of Israel remained except for Caleb son of Yefuneh and Joshua. That is not so. Rather, you read and find that Elazar ben Aaron the priest entered, and through him the land was distributed to each and every tribe of the children of those who departed from Egypt, as it is stated: “These are the inheritances that Elazar the priest and Joshua son of Nun…apportioned” (Joshua 19:51). How is it so that it said: “And no man remained of them except Caleb…,” and you find that Elazar remained? Rather, [the example of] Elazar came and taught regarding his tribe; just as he entered, so did they enter. Like that which we learned: Any matter that was included in a generalization, but emerged to teach a halakha, it emerged to teach not in its regard but to teach regarding the entire generalization.23Baraita of Rabbi Yishmael, principle 8. Elazar was included in the generalization of Israel regarding the decree, as it is stated: “They will die in the wilderness.” He emerged from the generalization of Israel to teach. It was not to teach in his regard, but to teach regarding the entire tribe. If you say that the entire tribe did not enter, Elazar did not enter. If you say he entered, the entire tribe entered as well. Rabbi Tanḥuma bar Rabbi Abba said: I asked and studied it before Rabbi Abba Huna HaKohen bar Rabbi Avin, and I said to him: Know that the entire tribe of Levi entered the Land of Israel, and I said to him from the Bible: “These are the inheritances that Elazar the priest [and Joshua son of Nun…apportioned]” (Joshua 19:51). He said to me: Was the decree not issued only upon twenty-year-olds? You find that one who was less than twenty years old entered. Say that Elazar was less than twenty years old. I said to him: We find that he was married to a wife while still in Egypt, as it is stated: “Elazar son of Aaron took of the daughters of Putiel as his wife” (Exodus 6:25). Rabbi Huna said to me: I say he was ten years old. Was not the decree only upon one twenty years old? I said to him: But did he not serve in the Tent of Meeting before the decree was issued, as it is stated: “The charge of Elazar son of Aaron the priest…[all the Tabernacle and all that is in it]” (Numbers 4:16), and we find that no one of the priests had license to enter and serve in the Tent of Meeting unless he was thirty years old, as it is stated: “From thirty years old and above, until fifty years old…” (Numbers 4:39). We find, then, that before the decree was issued, Elazar was at least thirty years old. Immediately, Rav Huna conceded to Rabbi Tanḥuma that the entire tribe of Levi entered the Land. That is why the Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: Since Israel is not entering and the tribe of Levi is entering, when you come to count them, make a distinction between them. That is what is written: “However, the tribe of Levi you shall not count…” (Numbers 1:49) – you do not count them with Israel, but you count them separately. That is what is written: “Count the children of Levi.”

46. 3.8

    “Every male” – why “every male,” and it does not mention every female? It is because the glory of the Holy One blessed be He is exalted by the males. David said: “Behold, sons are a portion of the Lord; a reward, the fruit of one’s womb.” (Psalms 127:3). “Behold, sons are a portion of the Lord” – these are the males, but if the females came, they too are a reward. “From one month old and above you shall count them” – why “from one month old and above”? Are they able to guard the Tent of Meeting from one month old? He Himself requests those who should guard it; why does He count “from one month old”? Rabbi Huna HaKohen said in the name of Rabbi Shmuel bar Ze’eira: It is in order to double their reward. Why? You find that they approach to serve only from thirty years old. Why then does He count them from one month old? It is so they will receive reward while they are still one month old. Rabbi Huna HaKohen said in the name of Rabbi Shmuel bar Ze’eira: You find written in Samuel’s regard: “Samuel judged Israel all the days of his life” (I Samuel 7:15). Did Samuel judge Israel “all the days of his life”? But all the days of his life were only fifty-two years, and you find two during which he was nursing, forty years during which Eli was alive and judging, in which Samuel was unable to judge before his teacher, and two years that Saul ruled; that is forty-two. Ten years remained there; that is, he bore the burden of Israel for only ten years, but it is written: “Samuel judged Israel all the days of his life.” Rather, the Holy One blessed be He said: I am writing in his regard “all the days of his life” so that he will receive reward for all the days that he existed in the world. Regarding the tribe of Levi, too, the Holy One blessed be He said to Moses that he should count them from one month old and above, so that their reward would be calculated for them from one month old. That is, “from one month old and above you shall count them.” Another matter: “From one month old” – Rabbi Yehuda HaLevi bar Rabbi Shalom said: The Holy One blessed be He is accustomed to be counting this tribe everywhere from when they are still young. From where is it derived? When the Holy One blessed be He said to Jacob to descend to Egypt, at that moment he counted his offspring; they all totaled sixty-six, as it is stated: “All the people were sixty-six” (Genesis 46:26). The two sons of Joseph and Joseph, that is sixty-nine. But it says: “All the people of the house of Jacob who came to Egypt were seventy” (Genesis 46:27). Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman said: The Holy One blessed be He is accustomed to count this tribe while they are still in their mother’s womb. Rabbi Berekhya HaKohen bar Rabbi said: This resin does not begin to emerge before one absorbs it;24As soon as it appears it is taken. Similarly as soon as the Levite appears, he is counted. so, Yokheved, her mother was pregnant with her at that moment, and she was in her mother’s womb and she was counted. Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish: Before her mother entered into the threshold of Egypt, she gave birth to her. That is why it is stated in her regard: “With seventy people your ancestors descended to Egypt.” (Deuteronomy 10:22). Regarding the children of her children as well: “Every male from one month old and above, you shall count them.” Why is it so? It is because this tribe is always beloved before the Holy One blessed be He. Of all the tribes, it is only this tribe alone that was chosen, as it is stated: “And chose it from all the tribes of Israel to be priests for Me” (I Samuel 2:28). Rabbi Levi said: You find that there are many items that the Holy One blessed be He created in the world and he selected one of them for Himself. He created seven days, and the Holy One blessed be He chose Shabbat, as it is stated: “God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it” (Genesis 2:3). He created years, and selected one for Himself, as it is stated: “The land shall observe a Shabbat for the Lord; [.…the seventh year shall be a Shabbat of solemn rest for the land]” (Leviticus 25:2–4). He created seven-year cycles and selected one for Himself, as it is stated: “You shall sanctify the fiftieth year” (Leviticus 25:10). He created lands, and selected one of them for Himself, the Land of Israel, as it is stated: “The eyes of the Lord your God are always upon it” (Deuteronomy 11:12). Likewise, the Holy One blessed be He characterizes it as His land: “They divided My land” (Joel 4:2). He created heavens, and selected one of them for Himself; this is the highest heaven, as it is stated: “Praise Him who rides in the highest heavens” (Psalms 68:5). He created nations, and selected one of them for Himself; this is Israel, as it is stated: “And the Lord has chosen you to be a treasured people for Him” (Deuteronomy 14:2). He created tribes, and selected one of them for Himself; this is the tribe of Levi, as it is stated: “And chose it from all the tribes of Israel” (I Samuel 2:28). That is why the Holy One blessed be He said to Moses to count them from one month old, because He is exceedingly fond of them. They raised an objection: According to these reasons, He should have counted them from one day old. Our Rabbis of blessed memory said: Why was it necessary to count them from one month old? It is because a one-day-old is not viable, but it is known that a one-month-old is viable; therefore, “from one month old and above you shall count them.” Alternatively, why were they counted from one month old? It is because the Levites were counted in this census only in order to redeem the firstborn of Israel. Just as the firstborn are redeemed from one month old, so the Levites were counted from one month old.

47. 3.9

    “Moses counted them according to the directive of the Lord” (Numbers 3:16) – Moses said before the Holy One blessed be He: ‘You say to me to count them from one month old; can I move and circulate in their courtyards and inside their houses and count each and every one, that You are saying to me: “Every male from one month old and above, you shall count them”?’ The Holy One blessed be He said to him: ‘You do yours and I will do Mine.’ Rabbi Yehuda HaLevi bar Rabbi Shalom said: Moses would go and stand at the entrance of their tents, and the Divine Presence would draw near and say to him: There are five children in this house, there are five children in that tent, there are ten children in that tent. That is what is written: “Moses counted them according to the directive of the Lord,” just as the Divine Presence says to him.

48. 3.10

    “These [eleh] were the sons of Levi by their names…” (Numbers 3:17) – Rabbi Abbahu said: Every place that eleh is stated, it rejects what preceded it; ve’eleh adds to what preceded it. Here, where it is stated: “These [eleh] were the sons of Levi by their names,” what does it reject? It rejects the firstborn of Israel, who worshipped the calf. “And these are the names of the sons of Gershon [by their families]” (Numbers 3:18) – see how beloved the Levites are, as the Holy One blessed be He engaged Himself in all their families to count their names, what He did not do regarding Israel. That is what is written: “And these are the names of the sons of Gershon by their families: Livni and Shimi”; and likewise, “the sons of Kehat: Amram and Yitzhar, Ḥevron and Uziel” (Numbers 3:19); and likewise, “the sons of Merari by their families: Maḥli and Mushi” (Numbers 3:20). Our Rabbis said: These are the eight priestly watches25Each week a different shift worked in the Temple. that Moses instituted at the directive of the Holy One blessed be He, until David stood and rendered them twenty-four for the priesthood and the Levites.26Tosefta, Taanit 3:2.

49. 3.11

    “For Gershon, the family of the Livnites [and the Shimites]” (Numbers 3:21) – why was it necessary to repeat their families; were they not stated above? Why did the verse need this? Because it says: “These are the sons of Aaron: the firstborn [Nadav, and Avihu, Elazar, and Itamar].… Nadav [and Avihu] died…” (Numbers 3:2–4) – although Aaron had four sons, only the two, Elazar and Itamar, established families; perhaps the same is true regarding the Levites. Although Gershon has two sons, Kehat four sons, and Merari two sons, perhaps not all of them established families. That is why the verse repeated when it came to enumerate the sons of Gershon, Kehat, and Merari. It specified that all their sons established families, as they were all righteous. The children of Levi are beloved, as the Omnipresent Himself dealt with each and every one of their families regarding their number, their location, their princes, and their service in the Tabernacle. The sons of Gershon, what does it say? “The number of all males counted…[were seven thousand five hundred]” (Numbers 3:22); thus the verse dealt in the number of the sons of Gershon. “The families of the Gershonites shall encamp behind the Tabernacle to the west” (Numbers 3:23) – that is their location. “The prince of the patrilineal house [of the Gershonites] was Elyasaf [son of Lael]” (Numbers 3:24) – that is their prince. “The commission of the sons of Gershon.… and the hangings of the courtyard…” (Numbers 3:25–26) – that is their service in the Tabernacle. Likewise, the verse counts the sons of Kehat. That is what is written: “For Kehat, the family of the Amramites, [and the family of the Yitzharites, and the family of the Hevronites, and the family of the Uzielites]” (Numbers 3:27) – the verse apprised regarding the sons of Kehat that all of them established families, and not one of them perished. “In number, all males, [from one month old and above, eight thousand and six hundred, keepers of the commission of the sacred]” (Numbers 3:28) – that is their number. Why did the verse specify regarding the number of sons of Kehat “keepers of the commission of the sacred,” which is not stated regarding the number of the sons of Gershon nor regarding the number of sons of Merari; were the sons of Kehat “keepers of the commission of the sacred” from one month old and above? After all, one was not eligible for service until he was thirty years old. Why did it do so? It is because the Ark would purge from the sons of Kehat and would diminish their number, as it would shorten their lives.27An improper action by somebody carrying the Ark could lead to his death. Nevertheless, due to their affection for the sacred, the sons of Kehat would run after it. That is why He accorded them a reward as though they entered to serve from one month old, as it is written regarding Samuel the Ramatite: “Samuel judged Israel all the days of his life” (I Samuel 7:15). He, too, was of the descendants of Kehat. “The families of the sons of Kehat shall encamp on the side of the Tabernacle to the south” (Numbers 3:29) – that is their place. “And the prince of the patrilineal house [of the families of the Kehatites was Elitzafan son of Uziel]” (Numbers 3:30) – that is their prince. “Their commission: the Ark, [the Table, the Candelabrum, the altars, the sacred vessels with which they would serve, the screen, and all its work]” (Numbers 3:31) – that is their service in the Tabernacle. “The prince of the princes of the Levites [was Elazar son of Aaron the priest, the charge over the keepers of the commission of the sacred]” (Numbers 3:32) – why did it specify two princes for the sons of Kehat? It is because priests and Levites emerged from Kehat. Moses and Aaron emerged from Amram; Moses’s sons were Levites, and Aaron’s sons were priests. That is why it specified Elazar, who was from the priests, and he was overseer of the Levites of the sons of Kehat, and he would carry some of the sacred service [items] with the sons of Kehat. That is what is written: “The charge of Elazar, son of Aaron [the priest, is the illuminating oil, the fragrant incense, the meal offering of the daily offering, and the anointing oil; the charge of the entire Tabernacle, and of all that is in it, in the sacred, and in its vessels]” (Numbers 4:16). Why did it not specify Itamar? After all, the commissions of the sons of Gershon and the sons of Merari were entrusted to him. Why did it not enumerate him with them as a prince like it enumerated Elazar as a prince with the sons of Kehat? It is because Itamar did not participate in the service of the sons of Gershon and the sons of Merari; that is why it did not enumerate him as a prince with them. However, Elazar participated in the burden of the sons of Kehat; that is why the verse enumerated him as a prince with them. “For Merari, the family of the Maḥlites [and the family of the Mushites]” (Numbers 3:33) – the verse counted the sons of Merari, as not one of them died and they established families. “The number of all males counted…[were six thousand two hundred]” (Numbers 3:34) – it apprised of their number. “The prince of the patrilineal house [of the families of Merari was Tzuriel son of Aviḥayil]…” (Numbers 3:35) – that is their prince. “They shall encamp on the side of the Tabernacle to the north” (Numbers 3:35) – that is their place. “The appointed commission of the sons of Merari…” (Numbers 3:36) – that is their service in the Tabernacle.

50. 3.12

    “These encamped in front of the Tabernacle, to the east, in front of the Tent of Meeting eastward: Moses, and Aaron, and his sons, keeping the commission of the Sanctuary, for the commission of the children of Israel; and the commoner who approaches shall be put to death” (Numbers 3:38). “These encamped in front of the Tabernacle, to the east” – Kehat merited that his descendants surrounded the Tabernacle in two directions. The tribe of Levi became four divisions to surround the four directions of the Tabernacle, corresponding to the four banners. In accordance with their actions, the Levites encamped in the four directions just as the banners were arranged. How so? West, from there were the storehouses of snow, the storehouses of hail, cold, and heat.28The west is associated with these weather phenomena. Corresponding to them encamped the banner of Ephraim, Benjamin, and Manasseh, who were mighty, in order to withstand them all. Likewise, the Holy One blessed be He settled Gershon to the west, as his sacred service was “the Tent, its covering, and the screen” (Numbers 3:25). What can withstand snow, hail, cold, and heat? It is a tent, a covering, and a screen. That is why he was called Gershon. Who will reside in the face of snow, hail, cold, and heat? It is one who is as strong as ivory.29Gershon is a portmanteau of gar – reside, and shen – ivory. Ivory is nothing other than an expression of strength, as it is written: “His belly is like a tablet of ivory” (Song of Songs 5:14). The south, from which dews of blessing and rains of blessing emerge into the world, there, the banner of Reuben, who is a penitent, encamps. It is by virtue of penitence that rain falls. Likewise, the Holy One blessed be He settled in that same southern direction the sons of Kehat, who would bear the Ark in which the Torah was, as the rains are dependent only upon the Torah, as it is stated: “If you follow My statutes.… I will provide your rains…” (Leviticus 26:3–4), and “But if you reject My statutes” (Leviticus 26:15), “I will render your heavens like iron” (Leviticus 26:19). That is why he was called Kehat, just as it says: “If the iron is blunt [keha]” (Ecclesiastes 10:10) – if you see that the heavens have been blunted from causing rain to fall and have become iron, just as it says: “I will render your heavens like iron,” know that it is due to a punishment for Torah that they did not fulfill, as it is written: “And one did not whet [kilkal] the edge [panim]” (Ecclesiastes 10:10). It is because they did not fulfill the Torah that was given to them face-to-face, just as it says: “Face-to-face [panim befanim] the Lord spoke with you…” (Deuteronomy 5:4), and they corrupted [kilkelu] their actions. That is kilkal. The north, from which darkness emerges into the world, there encamps the tribe of Dan, who embodied the darkness of the idol crafted by Yerovam and situated in Dan. That is why the children of Merari encamped there, as their labor was with wood: “The boards of the Tabernacle, and its bars, and its pillars” (Numbers 3:36), just as it says: “[Their] doctrine is but delusion; it is a piece of wood” (Jeremiah 10:8). That is why his name was called Merari, because of bitterness [merur].30Bitterness is caused by idol worship. The east, from which light emerges into the world, there, the encampment of Judah, who were masters of royalty, masters of Torah, and masters of mitzvot, encamps. That is why Moses, Aaron and his sons encamped there, as they were masters of Torah and masters of mitzvot, and they atoned for Israel with their prayers and their offerings. In their regard it is stated: Happy is the righteous and happy is his neighbor;31Mishna Sukka 56:2. these are the tribes that were adjacent to Moses and Aaron: Judah, Issachar, and Zebulun. They were all great in Torah: “The scepter shall not depart [from Judah, nor a scholar from among his descendants]” (Genesis 49:10); “from the children of Issachar, possessors of understanding” (I Chronicles 12:33); “from Zebulun, those who ply the scribe’s quill” (Judges 5:14). Because they were neighbors of the Torah, they all became Torah scholars. Three in the south, who were adjacent to masters of divisiveness, were eradicated with them. In their regard it was stated: Woe to the wicked, woe to his neighbor. Who were the masters of divisiveness? It was “Koraḥ son of Yitzhar son of Kehat” (Numbers 16:1).32Referring to Koraḥ and his assembly. Because Reuben, Simeon, and Gad were adjacent to them, they were all masters of divisiveness, as it says: “Koraḥ son of Yitzhar [son of Kehat] took […sons of Reuben]” (Numbers 16:1). Likewise, the sons of Gad and the sons of Simeon were also masters of divisiveness.33The tribes of Reuben and Gad remained east of the Jordan, and Zimri (see Numbers 25:6–14) was the prince of the tribe of Simeon. “Keeping the commission of the Sanctuary, for the commission of the children of Israel” – they would guard so that Israel would not enter there. Why to that extent? Since were they to enter there, they would be punishable by death. That is what is written: “And the commoner who approaches shall be put to death.”

51. 3.13

    “All those counted of the Levites, whom Moses and Aaron counted by the directive of the Lord, by their families, all males from one month old and above, were twenty-two thousand” (Numbers 3:39). “All those counted of the Levites, whom Moses and Aaron [ve’aharon] counted” – the vav in ve’aharon is dotted because Aaron was not part of the census.34He was not counted, nor did he participate with Moses in the census. Similarly, “may the Lord judge between me and you [uveinekha]” (Genesis 16:5) – as she said it only regarding Hagar alone.35There is a dot over the yod in uveinekha, indicating that Sarah did not demand that God punish Abraham. Some say, it was regarding those who introduce discord between him and her.36While this interpretation also maintains that Sarah was referring to Hagar, it is not based on the dot over the yod, but rather on understanding “between me and you” as referring to one who introduces discord between them. Similarly, “They said to him [elav]: Where is Sarah?” (Genesis 18:9) – the alef in elav is dotted, as they knew where she was but made inquiries about her. Similarly, “He did not know when she lay down and when she arose [uvkuma]” (Genesis 19:33) – the vav in the middle of uvkuma regarding the elder daughter is dotted; he did not know when she lay down, but he knew when she arose. Similarly, “he kissed him [vayishakehu] (Genesis 33:4)37Esau kissed Jacob. – it is dotted, because he did not kiss him with all his heart. Similarly, “his brothers went to herd et” (Genesis 37:12) – why is it dotted over et? It teaches that they did not go to herd, but rather to eat, drink, and be seduced. Similarly, “or on a distant [reḥoka] journey” (Numbers 9:10) – the ḥet of reḥoka is dotted.38While the midrash here states that there is a dot on the ḥet, the Mishna (Pesaḥim 93b) and other sources state that the dot is on the heh. In our Torah scrolls the dot is on the heh. It teaches that even if it was not a distant journey, but just outside the threshold of the courtyard of the Temple. Some say, even if it was a near journey, but it39The path which he has to take to reach the Temple (Etz Yosef). is impure, he would not perform the rite of the paschal offering with them. Similarly, “we laid waste until Nofaḥ that [asher]” (Numbers 21:30) – the reish in asher is dotted, as it was so even beyond there. Some say: It teaches that they did not destroy the entire country, but rather the large cities. Similarly, “You shall offer one-tenth [isaron isaron] for each” (Numbers 29:15) – the first isaron of the first day of the festival is dotted. It teaches that there was only one one-tenth alone.40Namely, there was only a one-tenth measure, and for sacrifices which require two-tenths or three-tenths, each tenth would be measured separately. Similarly, “The concealed are for the Lord our God, but the revealed are for us and for our children [lanu ulvaneinu] forever [ad olam]” (Deuteronomy 29:28) – why is it dotted over lanu ulvaneinu and the ayin of ad? He said to them: ‘If you perform the revealed, I will inform you of the concealed.’ Some say: Why is it dotted? Rather, this is what Ezra said: If Elijah will come and say: Why did you write them?41I.e., you should not have written them. I will say to him: I dotted above them. If he will say: You wrote them well, I will erase the dots from above them.

52. 3.14

    “By the directive of the Lord, by their families, all males from one month old and above, were twenty-two thousand” – you find that the tribe of Levi in the detailed account was twenty-two thousand three hundred, because they were four families: Gershon, Kehat, Merari, and Moses.42Moses and Aaron had their own camp. Furthermore, Aaron and his sons were Kohanim. Therefore, the Levites are described as containing four families. However, the people in the fourth family who were counted are included in the count of Kehat. You read each and every family individually and calculate it: “For Gershon.… seven thousand five hundred” (Numbers 3:21–22); “for Kehat.…eight thousand six hundred” (Numbers 3:27–28); “for Merari.… six thousand two hundred” (Numbers 3:33–34). They total twenty-two thousand three hundred. When the verse includes all the Levites, it renders them twenty-two thousand. Where are the three hundred? Rather, those mentioned in the detailed count informed how many were in each and every family. Those who were included in the twenty-two thousand and had three hundred missing from them, why was this done? It was, because they were counted in order to be in parallel to, and to redeem, the firstborn of Israel. Three hundred from them that were firstborn among the Levites were subtracted, as a firstborn does not redeem a firstborn. Therefore, in the families there were twenty-two thousand three hundred, and in the total [there were] twenty-two thousand, to redeem the firstborn of Israel with them.

53. 4.1

    “The Lord said to Moses: Count every firstborn male of the children of Israel from one month old and above, and take the number of their names” (Numbers 3:40). “The Lord said to Moses: Count every firstborn male of the children of Israel…” – that is what is written: “Since you were precious in My eyes, you were honored…” (Isaiah 43:4). The Holy One blessed be He said to Jacob: Jacob, you are exceedingly precious in My eyes, as, as it were, I have affixed your visage to my Throne, and the angels laud Me in your Name and say: “Blessed is the Lord, God of Israel, from eternity to eternity” (Psalms 41:14). That is, “since you were precious in My eyes, you were honored…” Another matter: “Since you were precious in My eyes, you were honored” – the Holy One blessed be He said to Jacob: You are exceedingly precious in My eyes, as, as it were, I and My ministering angels emerged to greet you upon your departure to go to Padan Aram and upon your return. When you departed, what is written: “Jacob departed.… he encountered the place.… he dreamed, and behold, a ladder…[and behold, the angels of God].… And behold, the Lord stood over him… (Genesis 28:10–13). Rabbi Hoshaya said: Happy is one born of a woman who saw this, the King and His entourage standing over him and protecting him. From where is it derived upon his return? It is as it is stated: “Jacob went on his way, [and the angels of God encountered him]” (Genesis 32:2). Those are the angels; the Divine Presence, from where is it derived? “God appeared to Jacob again, upon his return [from Padan Aram]” (Genesis 35:9). That is, “since you were precious in My eyes, you were honored.” Another matter: “Since you were precious in My eyes…” – the Holy One blessed be He said to Jacob: You are precious in My eyes, as for all the nations of the world, I did not provide a census, but for you, I provided a census. This is analogous to a king who had many granaries and they were all foul and filled with black kernels. He was not particular about their number. He had one granary that he saw that it was fine. He said to a member of his household: ‘Those granaries are foul and filled with black kernels; therefore, do not be particular about their number. But ascertain how many kor are in this one, how many sacks, how many measures are in it.’ So, the king, this is the King of kings, the Holy One blessed be He. The granary, this is Israel: “It is like My threshing floor, the product of my granary” (Isaiah 21:10). Likewise, it says: “Israel is sacred to the Lord, the first of His crop” (Jeremiah 2:3). The member of his household, this is Moses, as it is stated: “Not so My servant Moses; in all My house he is faithful” (Numbers 12:7). The Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: ‘The idol worshippers are foul,’ as it is stated: “Peoples will be as burnings of lime, cut thorns…” (Isaiah 33:12); ‘therefore, do not be particular about their number. But Israel, they are righteous; their groups are all wheat,’ as it is stated: “Your people, they are all righteous” (Isaiah 60:21). Likewise it says: “All of you is fair, my love, and there is no blemish in you” (Song of Songs 4:7). ‘That is why you shall be particular about their number.’ So, Moses did; he counted them, how many kor are in it, as it is stated: “Take a census of the entire congregation of the children of Israel” (Numbers 1:2); how many sacks: “its host and those counted” (Numbers 2:4); how many measures, as it is stated: “Count every…male.”

54. 4.2

    Another matter: “Count every firstborn male…” – that is what is written: “They are sixty queens…[and young women without number].… One is my perfect dove…” (Song of Songs (6:8–9). This is analogous to a person who had merchandise of glass jewels, and he would take them out to market, and he would not notice their number as he would not count when taking them out. He would enter to place them, and he would not count when placing them, as he would not scrutinize them because they were made of glass. But he had one batch of merchandise of fine gems, and he would take it and count it when taking it out and count it when placing. So, as it were, the Holy One blessed be He said: For the nations of the world, I did not provide a census. Why? It is because they are of no significance to Me, as it is stated: “All the nations are as nothing before Him” (Isaiah 40:17). But you are My children, as it is stated: “Who have been carried from birth…” (Isaiah 46:3). That is why He counts them every moment. That is why it is stated: “Count every firstborn male…” That is, “they are sixty queens…[and young women without number].… One is my perfect dove…” – these are Israel.

55. 4.3

    “From one month old and above” – we learned there: A baby who was born in the eighth month, one may not desecrate Shabbat for his sake, one may not cut his umbilical cord, one may not carry him from place to place, but rather, his mother leans over him and nurses him. One who carries him is like carrying a stone on Shabbat. If he was born in the seventh month and it is uncertain whether he was born in the eighth month, one may not desecrate Shabbat for his sake, one may not cut his umbilical cord, one does not bury his placenta, and one does not carry him from place to place. But if it is certain that he was born in the seventh month, he is alive; one may desecrate Shabbat for his sake. One cuts his umbilical cord and buries his placenta so that the infant will not be cold, and one carries him from place to place.1From Tosefta, Shabbat 16:4. It contains only a short reference to the laws mentioned here. Why may one desecrate the Sabbath for one born in the seventh month? It is because he is viable. But one born in the eight month, his months of gestation were not completed and it is not viable.2There was a belief in the ancient world that a baby born after seven months was more viable than a baby born after eight months. Therefore, one may not desecrate Shabbat for its sake. They3The scholars of the nations of the world. asked Rabbi Abbahu: From where is it derived that one born in the seventh month is viable? I will bring an allusion for you from your own language: Live [zeta] – seven, go [eta] – eight.4The letter zeta represents seven in Greek, and it connotes life in several expressions. The letter eta represents eight and means go, which is interpreted as a reference to death. Which is one born in the eighth? It is one whose nails and hair are not complete. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says: Anyone who does not live thirty days, his months of gestation were not completed, but it is stillborn. Why? The opinion of Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel was based on the words of the Torah, as the Omnipresent commanded to count the firstborn in order to redeem them, only after thirty days. That is what is written: “Count every [firstborn] male [of the children of Israel from one month old and above].” “And take the number of their names” – He lifted up their heads, because the firstborn incurred liability to be executed due to the act of the calf.5The verse refers to the count of the firstborn as "lifting up their heads" to indicate that on the one hand they were being honored by being counted separately, but on the other hand they had been liable for having their heads removed, i.e., execution, for participating in the sin of the Golden Calf.

56. 4.4

    Another matter: “Count every firstborn male” – there is a beneficial remembrance [pekida] with regard to the firstborn, as it is stated: “Count [pekod] every firstborn male.” There is a beneficial remembrance with regard to children, as it is stated: “For the Lord remembered [fakad] Hannah, and she conceived and bore three sons and two daughters” (I Samuel 2:21). There is a beneficial remembrance with regard to preservation: “And Your beneficial remembrance [ufekudatekha] preserved my spirit” (Job 10:12). There is a beneficial remembrance with regard to peace, as it is stated: “I will beneficially remember you [fekudatekh] for peace” (Isaiah 60:17).

57. 4.5

    “You shall take the Levites for Me, I am the Lord, in place of every firstborn among the children of Israel, and the animals of the Levites in place of all the firstborn among the animals of the children of Israel (Numbers 3:41). “You shall take the Levites for Me” – they should be taken in My name. “I am the Lord” – I am trustworthy to pay a good reward to those who are taken in My Name. “In place of every firstborn among the children of Israel” – because the firstborn are Mine, as it is stated: “For all the firstborn [among the children of Israel] are Mine…on the day that I smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt…” (Numbers 8:17). The Holy One blessed be He said: Due to fondness of Israel, I altered the world order. How did I write in the Torah? It was that a donkey is redeemed with a lamb, as it is stated: “The first issue of a donkey you shall redeem with a lamb” (Exodus 34:20). I did not do so, but rather, I redeemed a lamb with a donkey: the Egyptians, who were called a donkey, as it is stated: “That their flesh is the flesh of donkeys” (Ezekiel 23:20), and Israel is called a lamb, as it is stated: “Israel is scattered sheep” (Jeremiah 50:17). I killed their firstborn, and I sanctified the firstborn of Israel, as it is stated: “For all the firstborn among the children of Israel are Mine…on the day that I smote all the firstborn [in the land of Egypt]” (Numbers 8:17). “And the animals of the Levites in place of all the firstborn among the animals of the children of Israel” – as you find that the Omnipresent killed the firstborn of Egypt’s animals and spared Israel’s animals. That is why He sanctified the firstborn of Israel’s animals. Likewise it says: “For all the firstborn [among the children of Israel] are Mine…on the day that I smote all the firstborn [in the land of Egypt].”

58. 4.6

    “Moses counted, as the Lord commanded him, all firstborn among the children of Israel” (Numbers 3:42). “Moses counted, as the Lord commanded him, all firstborn among the children of Israel” – you find that it is stated regarding the census of the Levites: “At the directive of the Lord,” as it is stated: “Moses counted them at the directive of the Lord” (Numbers 3:16).6Literally: in accordance with the words of the Lord. It teaches that the Divine Presence would say to him: ‘There are this many Levite babies in this house.’ Why? It is because He brings them near to His service. However, in the census of the firstborn, when He removes them from His service, the Holy One blessed be He does not associate Himself with their census. That is why it does not say in their regard: “At the directive of the Lord.” Another matter: The Levites, who were righteous, did not participate in the deed of the Golden Calf, and devoted themselves to the sanctification of His Name, as it is stated: “He said: Whoever is for the Lord, come to me, and all the sons of Levi gathered to him” (Exodus 32:26). The Holy One blessed be He said: They associated themselves with Me; I, too, will associate Myself to count them Myself and in My own glory. But the firstborn distanced themselves from the Holy One blessed be He, and they sacrificed before the calf; therefore, the Holy One blessed be He distanced Himself from their census.

59. 4.7

    “All the firstborn males according to the number of names, from one month old and above, by their count, were twenty-two thousand and two hundred and seventy-three” (Numbers 3:43) “All the firstborn males according to the number of names, from one month old and above…were…” – the firstborn outnumbered the Levites by two hundred and seventy-three. When Moses saw this, he did not know what to do. Moses said: The Omnipresent said to me that I should count the Levites and I should count the firstborn of Israel; and that I should take the Levites in His Name in place of the firstborn of Israel. But the firstborn of Israel outnumber the Levites by two hundred and seventy-three. Now, what shall I do to those surplus firstborn of Israel over and above the number of Levites? Immediately, the Divine Speech came suddenly upon Moses and instructed him what to do. That is what is written: “The Lord spoke [to Moses, saying]” (Numbers 3:44).

60. 4.8

    “Take the Levites in place of all the firstborn among the children of Israel, and the animals of the Levites in place of their animals; the Levites shall be Mine, I am the Lord” (Numbers 3:45). “Take the Levites…” – our Rabbis said: Why did the Holy One blessed be He command to redeem the firstborn of Israel with the Levites? It is because initially the firstborn were performing the sacrificial service, until the tribe of Levi arose, as our Rabbis taught: Until the Tabernacle was established, private altars were permitted and the sacrificial service was performed by the firstborn. From the establishment of the Tabernacle, private altars were prohibited and the sacrificial service was performed by the priests.7 Zevaḥim 112b. Know that the firstborn were sacrificing until the tribe of Levi arose; take proof from the beginning of the creation of the world. Adam the first man was the firstborn of the world. When he sacrificed his offering, as it is stated: “May it please the Lord more than a bull with horns and hooves” (Psalms 69:32), he donned the vestments of the High Priest, as it is stated: “The Lord God made for Adam and for his wife hide tunics, and clothed them” (Genesis 3:21). They were praiseworthy garments, and the firstborn would perform the service in them. When Adam died, he bequeathed them to Seth. Seth gave them to Methuselah. When Methuselah died, he bequeathed them to Noah. Noah arose and sacrificed an offering, as it is stated: “He took from every pure animal…[and offered up burnt offerings]” (Genesis 8:20). Noah died, and he bequeathed them to Shem. Was Shem the firstborn? Was it not Yefet who was the firstborn, as it is stated: “Brother of Yefet the eldest” (Genesis 10:21)? Why, then, did he bequeath them to Shem? It is because Noah foresaw that the line of the patriarchs would be established from him. Know that Shem would sacrifice, as it is stated: “And Malkitzedek8Commenting on this verse, Rashi quotes a midrash (perhaps from Bereshit Rabba 56) that identifies Malkitzedek with Shem the son of Noah. king of Shalem…[he was a priest of God the Most High]” (Genesis 14:18). Was priesthood granted to him? Priesthood was not given until Aaron stood. What is it that it says here: “He was a priest”? It is because he would sacrifice like priests. Shem died, and he bequeathed it to Abraham. Was Abraham the firstborn? Rather, because he was righteous, the birthright9I.e., the status of firstborn. was passed to him and he sacrificed, as it is stated: “He offered it up as a burnt offering in place of his son” (Genesis 22:13). Abraham died, and bequeathed it to Isaac. Isaac arose and gave it to Jacob. Was Jacob firstborn? It is, rather, that you find that Jacob took it from Esau cunningly. He said to him: “Sell me your birthright today” (Genesis 25:31). Do you think, perhaps, that it was for nothing that Jacob said to Esau that he should sell him the birthright? No. It is, rather, that Jacob sought to sacrifice, but he could not because he was not a firstborn. Esau said: What do I want with this birthright, as it is stated: “Esau said: Behold, I am going to die, [and why do I need a birthright]” (Genesis 25:32). At that moment, Ezekiel’s prophecy applied in his regard and said to him: “Surely, you hated blood, and blood will pursue you” (Ezekiel 35:6). Did Esau hate blood? Did he not kill several righteous men, did he not kill several pious men, and it says: “Surely, you hated blood, and blood will pursue you”? Rather, he said to him: ‘Surely, you hated the blood of an offering,’ as he was firstborn, and the firstborn sacrifice. Therefore, “blood will pursue you.” At that moment, when Jacob acquired the birthright, he began sacrificing, as it is stated: “God said to Jacob: Arise, ascend to Beit El…and make there an altar…” (Genesis 35:1). Likewise, when Moses sacrificed at Sinai, it was the firstborns who sacrificed, as it is stated: “He sent the lads of the children of Israel, [and they offered up burnt offerings]” (Exodus 24:5). Who are the “lads”? They were the elite of the firstborn. “They offered up burnt offerings” – you learn that no person would sacrifice other than the firstborn. When Israel performed that deed,10They sinned with the Golden Calf. they said: Let the firstborn come and sacrifice offerings before it, as it is stated: “They arose early the next day, and they offered up burnt offerings and they presented peace offerings” (Exodus 32:6). God said to them: ‘I promoted the firstborn, and I rendered them prominent in the world, but they rejected Me and arose and sacrificed before the calf. I will remove the firstborn and bring in the children of Levi.’ Therefore, God said to Moses that he should count them, as it is stated: “Count the children of Levi” (Numbers 3:15). Rabbi Yehuda HaLevi said: Who whispered to you that God removed the firstborn from sacrificial rites and appointed the children of Levi, as it is stated: “Take the Levites”? In place of whom? “In place of all the firstborn among the children of Israel, and the animals of the Levites in place of their animals; the Levites shall be Mine, I am the Lord.” The Rabbis said: To what is this matter comparable? To a provincial money changer regarding whom a matter of corruption was attributed. The king knew, and said to his governor, ‘remove him and appoint another in his place.’ Nevertheless, that money changer is found to be obligated to repay a debt. The king said: Let the one who inherited his place repay his debt. So, the firstborn were prominent in the world, but arose and sacrificed before the calf. God said: Let the firstborn depart, and let the children of Levi enter. Nevertheless, the firstborn incurred liability to be eliminated. God said: Let the Levites come and redeem them. Therefore, you find the Levites redeeming the firstborn. That is what is written: “Take the Levites…” “And the animals of the Levites in place of their animals” – because priests and Levites are exempt from redeeming their firstborn, the firstborn of man and the firstborn of a donkey, [the latter of] which is likened by the verse to the firstborn of man, as it is written: “However, you shall redeem [the firstborn of man], and the firstborn of an impure animal you shall redeem” (Numbers 18:15). But they are not exempt from [redeeming] the firstborn of a pure animal, as it is sacred. What is, “the Levites shall be Mine, I am the Lord”? I am trustworthy to pay them a good reward because they sanctified My Name at the time of the calf.

61. 4.9

    “And for the redemptions of the two hundred and seventy-three of the firstborn of the children of Israel, that are over and above the number of Levites” (Numbers 3:46). “And for the redemptions of the [two hundred and seventy-] three” – our Rabbis said: Were the firstborn more numerous than the Levites, that it says: “That are over and above the number of Levites”? But based on the tally, the Levites were more numerous than the firstborn, as you find that the tribe of Levi, in the detailed account, was twenty-two thousand three hundred, because they were four families: Gershon, Kehat, Merari, and Moses. You read each and every family individually and calculate it, and indeed, the four of them total twenty-two thousand three hundred. The firstborn, you find twenty-two thousand two hundred and seventy-three. Consequently, the Levites were more numerous than the firstborn by twenty-seven. But it says regarding the firstborn: “That are over and above the number of Levites.” Rather, because there were twenty-two thousand firstborn and two hundred and seventy-three, all of them firstborn. But among the Levites there were three hundred firstborn. That is why in their detailed account they totaled twenty-two thousand three hundred, while in the general account, twenty-two thousand and no more. You find that in the tally, the firstborn were not more numerous than the Levites, but with regard to the firstborn,11In the context of the commandment to redeem the firstborns with the Levites there were more firstborns. they were more numerous than the Levites were. Remove the firstborn from them, as a firstborn does not redeem a firstborn, and they were three hundred firstborns. The result was that the firstborn of Israel were more numerous than the Levites by two hundred and seventy-three. This is the question that Agentus, the Roman general, asked Rabban Yoḥanan ben Zakai. He said to him: ‘Moses your master was either a thief or he did not know how to calculate.’ He said to him: ‘Why?’ Agentus said to him: ‘Because there were twenty-two thousand firstborn and another two hundred and seventy-three, and the Omnipresent commanded that the Levites redeem the firstborn. Place twenty-two thousand Levites opposite twenty-two thousand firstborn. Moreover, among the Levites, three hundred over and above twenty-two thousand, as it is calculated in the first tally in the detailed account. Why did those three hundred excess Levites not redeem those two hundred and seventy-three firstborn that were in excess of twenty-two thousand firstborn? We find that for those two hundred and seventy-three they gave five shekels each. Moreover, why, when it ultimately provided a general account of the Levites, why did it subtract three hundred from the initial tally? Did he not steal them from the tally only so those two hundred and seventy-three firstborn would give five shekels each to Aaron his brother? Or perhaps, he does not know how to calculate.’ Rabban Yoḥanan said: ‘He was not a thief, and he knew how to calculate, but there is one matter that he whispered to me to say to you.’ He said to him: ‘Say it.’ Rabban Yoḥanan ben Zakai said to him: ‘You know how to read, but you do not know how to expound.’ [And] he said: ‘Those twenty-two thousand Levites redeem the twenty-two thousand firstborn. Another three hundred remained among the Levites; among the firstborn, another two hundred and seventy-three. Those three hundred among the Levites were firstborn, and a firstborn does not redeem a firstborn. That is why, after he counted them, he “stole” them, because they were firstborn.’ Immediately, he left him.

62. 4.10

    “You shall take five shekels each by head count; in the sacred shekel you shall take, twenty gera is the shekel” (Numbers 3:47). “You shall take five shekels each…” – the Holy One blessed be He said: You sold Rachel’s firstborn, that is, Joseph, for twenty silver pieces, which are five shekels; therefore, each and every one of you will redeem his firstborn son for five sela according to the Tyrian maneh.12In that system of currency, each shekel, or sela, is worth four dinars. “You shall give the silver to Aaron and to his sons, the redemptions of those among them who remain” (Numbers 3:48) “You shall give the silver to Aaron and to his sons, the redemptions of those among them who remain” – just as the Levites were given to Aaron and his sons, as it is written: “You shall give the Levites to Aaron and to his sons; they are given to him from the children of Israel” (Numbers 3:9), so, the money of redemption that was in place of the Levites was given to him. “Moses took the silver of the redemption from those who were over and above the number of redemptions of the Levites” (Numbers 3:49). “Moses took the silver of the redemption…” – what did he do to them?13To the people. Rabbi Yehuda and Rabbi Neḥemya: Rabbi Yehuda says: This is what he did: He wrote Levi on each of twenty-two thousand notes and placed them in a receptacle. In addition, on each of two hundred and seventy-three notes, he wrote: Five sela, and placed them in the receptacle and mixed them. The father of a firstborn would extend his hand into the receptacle. If a note on which: Son of Levi, was written entered his hand, he would say to him: A son of Levi has already redeemed you. One into whose hand a note entered on which five sela was written, he would say to him: Give the five sela that you owe. All of them did so. Rabbi Neḥemya says: If so, he can deliberate with him and say to him: It is not for you to say to give five sela. Each of the notes upon which Levi was written was taken. If I place my hand, what will enter my hand if not notes of five sela? Who will say to me that had there been a note of Levi there that I would not have obtained it. Rather, this is what he did: He wrote Levi on each of twenty-two thousand two hundred and seventy-three notes, and on two hundred and seventy-three: Five sela. They came and placed their hand. One into whose hand a note of five sela entered, if he came to say anything to him, Moses would respond to him: Had you merited it, would there not have been a note of Levi? Rather, you are obligated by Heaven. At that moment he would give it.

63. 4.11

    “From the firstborn of the children of Israel he took the silver: One thousand and three hundred and sixty-five shekels, in the sacred shekels” (Numbers 3:50) “From the firstborn of the children of Israel he took the silver: One thousand and three hundred and sixty-five shekels, in the sacred shekels” – it teaches that the sacred shekels are not like the ordinary shekels. Ordinary shekels, if one weighs each one individually, then weighs them all as one, he will either have a surplus or a shortage.14They are not exact. The difference from the standard weight may be too small to be noticed when weighing the coins individually, but it becomes evident when weighing them together. However, sacred shekels are precise; if one weighs each one individually and then weighs them all as one, he will have neither a surplus nor a shortage. “Moses gave the silver of the redemption to Aaron and to his sons, according to the directive of the Lord, as the Lord commanded Moses” (Numbers 3:51). “Moses gave the silver of the redemption…[according to the directive of the Lord]” – it teaches that he did not give it to them until it was stated to him from the mouth of the Holy One blessed be He: Give it to them. “As the Lord commanded Moses” – he gave half to Aaron and half to his sons, just as the Holy One blessed be He said to him: “You shall give the silver to Aaron and his sons” (Numbers 3:48); Aaron is equivalent to his sons.

64. 4.12

    “The Lord spoke to Moses and to Aaron, saying” (Numbers 4:1). “The Lord spoke to Moses and to Aaron, saying” (Numbers 4:1) – because all the action in this portion involved Aaron, He included Aaron in the Divine Speech, as that is the principle: Anytime the Divine Speech is to the priests, the action involves the priests. “Take the census of the sons of Kehat from among the sons of Levi, by their families, by their patrilineal house” (Numbers 4:2). “Take the census of” – it does not say count [pekod], but rather, “Take the census of [naso et rosh],” an expression of elevation [nesiut]. When they were counted to be appointed over the Tabernacle service, they received an elevation. “From among the sons of Levi” – as from all of the sons of Levi, none were as important as the sons of Kehat. From them were priests and Levites. Because they were important, and moreover, their service was with items of the most sacred order, that is why they were counted first. As you find that when He counted them from one month old in order to redeem the firstborn, they were counted in accordance with their birth order: Gershon first, then Kehat, and then Merari. But here, when He counted them to appoint them over the sacred vessels, He counted them in accordance with the significance of their service. Kehat, because it was appointed over the Ark and items of the most sacred order, was privileged to be counted first. After him was Gershon, who was the firstborn and was appointed over the sheets and the Tent of Meeting, and after him was Merari, who was appointed over the beams, the bars, the pillars, the bases, and the pegs. “From thirty years old and above and until fifty years old, all those enlisted for duty, to perform labor in the Tent of Meeting” (Numbers 4:3). “From thirty years old and above…” and one verse says: “From twenty-five years old and above” (Numbers 8:24). How can these two verses coexist? It is from twenty-five years for study, from thirty for service. “This is the service of the sons of Kehat in the Tent of Meeting: Items of the most sacred order” (Numbers 4:4). “This is the service of the sons of Kehat…” – because Kehat merited that Aaron, who was of the most sacred order, emerged from him, that is why his descendants merited that their service was with items of the most sacred order.

65. 4.13

    “Aaron and his sons shall come with the travel of the camp, and they shall remove the curtain that screens, and cover the Ark of the Testimony with it” (Numbers 4:5). “Aaron and his sons shall come with the travel of the camp…” – the Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: When they will be dismantling the Tabernacle, the sons of Kehat shall not dismantle the curtain from before the Ark, but rather, the sons of Aaron shall enter, and they shall dismantle it because they are priests. Our Rabbis taught: The priests guard from within and the Levites from without. The partition of the priests is larger than the partition of the Levites.15The priests have greater sanctity and importance, and they are permitted to enter areas that the Levites are not. What would the sons of Aaron do when they removed the curtain? Rabbi Ḥama bar Rabbi Ḥanina said: They had for this large wooden poles with gold tines at their top, and some say iron [tines]. They would lift the curtain with the poles and remove it from the hooks. Nevertheless, they did not lower it all at once, so they would not glimpse the Ark. Rather, they lowered it a little at a time until they removed it and covered the Ark. From where is it derived? It is as God says to Moses, as it is stated: “Aaron and his sons shall come…” They said: The curtain was like a drape, and its thickness was one handbreadth. It was woven with seventy-two strands, and for each and every strand there were twenty-four threads. Three hundred priests would immerse it, and two High Priests16Elazar and Itamar. would carry it on the poles from before the Ark and would then place upon it a covering of the hide of a taḥash, so no part of the Ark would be seen. That is what is written: “They shall place upon it a covering of the hide of a taḥash…” (Numbers 4:6). Rabbi Natan says: The crafting of the Ark is as beloved as the supernal Throne of Glory, as it is stated: “The place [makhon] You fashioned for Your dwelling” (Exodus 15:17), as the Temple17The earthly Temple. is aligned with the Temple,18The supernal Temple. and the Ark with the Throne of Glory. He placed an Ark cover upon it, like the seraphs that stood above Him. He crafted two beloved cherubs in it, corresponding to the heavens and the earth, where the seat of the Holy One blessed be He is, as it is stated: “One cherub from this end [and one cherub from that end]” (Exodus 25:19). Just as the heavens open their storehouse for the earth, as it is stated: “The Lord will open for you His good storehouse, the heavens” (Deuteronomy 28:12), so, the Divine Presence is situated above the two cherubs, which are situated on this side and on that side and are aligned with one another, as it is stated: “Their faces toward one another” (Exodus 25:20). They are patterned after the Throne of Glory, which is aligned with the Holy One blessed be He, as it is stated: “From Zion, the epitome of beauty, God appears” (Psalms 50:2). Even when they were traveling, they would not spread over it a cloth of purple wool nor of scarlet wool, but rather a cloth of entirely sky-blue wool. Why? It is because the sky-blue wool evokes the sea, the sea evokes the sky, and the sky evokes the Throne of Glory, as it is stated: “Above the firmament that was over their heads was the appearance of sapphire stone [in the likeness of a throne]” (Ezekiel 1:26). It is to teach you that the Ark was like the Throne of Glory. That is why it is stated in its regard: “Entirely of sky-blue wool” (Exodus 28:31), as it is all similar to it. Because the Ark is similar to it; therefore, the cloth of sky-blue wool was over it facing the sky to which it was similar, which you do not find regarding the rest of the vessels, that there would be a cloth of sky-blue over them, but rather a cloth of sky-blue wool underneath and a covering of the hide of a taḥash over it. But the Ark had a covering of the hide of a taḥash underneath and cloth of sky-blue wool over it. Moreover, regarding the Ark, it is stated: “Entirely of sky-blue wool,” which was not stated regarding all of them: “Entirely of sky-blue wool” – why? It is because it is the most important of the Tabernacle vessels. Rabbi Shimon says: There are three crowns: The crown of Torah, the crown of priesthood, and the crown of kingship; and the crown of a good name surpasses them.19Mishna Avot 4:13. The crafting of the Ark corresponds to the masters of Torah, who are distinguished. That is why He wrote: “From above” (Numbers 4:6), as anyone who merits the crown of Torah, it is as though he merited priesthood and kingship. Likewise it says: “Through me20"Me" refers to the Torah. kings reign…” (Proverbs 8:15).

66. 4.14

    “On the table of showbread they shall spread a cloth of sky-blue wool, and place upon it the bowls, and the saucers, and the supports, and the covering tubes; and the perpetual bread shall be upon it” (Numbers 4:7). The crafting of the table corresponds to the kingship of the house of David, as one covers the table with sky-blue wool, corresponding to David, who was righteous, and the Holy One blessed be He entered into a covenant with him, a covenant of kingship for him and his sons. This is why He separated its utensils from it and covered them with scarlet wool, as it was due to the sin of his descendants that the kingdom was divided. This is why it and its utensils were covered with a single covering,21The covering of a taḥash hide. as ultimately, the kingship will return to them as it was initially. “On the table of showbread they shall spread a sky-blue woolen cloth” – over all the vessels that stood in the Sanctuary they would spread a sky-blue cloth, because the Divine Presence rested there, similar to the supernal place of the Divine Presence that is similar to sky-blue wool. How would they do this? They would place on the body of the table a cloth of sky-blue wool to separate between it and its utensils. Then they would put its utensils upon it, as it is stated: “And place upon it the bowls…” “The bowls” – these are its molds, as they would prepare the showbread in a mold and would bake it in the oven in a mold. When they would remove it from the oven they would return it to a mold so the bread would not break. There were three molds there: one for the oven, one for the dough, and one for the bread that he would remove from the oven. They would place it in a mold so they would not ruin the bread. “The saucers” – these are the bowls of frankincense that they would place upon the arrangements, just as it says: “You shall place pure frankincense upon the arrangement” (Leviticus 24:7). How would they arrange the showbread? One would place six loaves for this arrangement and six loaves for that arrangement. If one placed eight loaves for this arrangement and four loaves for that arrangement, or if he prepared three arrangements with four in each, he has done nothing. If one prepared two arrangements of twelve each, Rabbi [Yehuda HaNasi] says: One considers the upper ones as though they were not there, and the lower ones are valid. How would they arrange the bowls? One would place one bowl upon this arrangement and one bowl upon that arrangement. If one placed bowls without frankincense or frankincense without bowls, or if there was an item that interposed between the [bowls of] frankincense and the bread or between the bread and the table, they are not valid. Abba Shaul said: One would place them in the two handbreadths between one arrangement and its counterpart. How then do I realize, “You shall place pure frankincense upon the arrangement” (Leviticus 24:7)? It is that it should be, in it entirety, adjacent to the arrangement. “And the supports” – these are the rods. Twenty-eight hollow golden rods that are susceptible to impurity were there, fourteen for this arrangement and fourteen for that arrangement. One would enter on the day before Shabbat, remove them, and place them along the length of the table. All the vessels that were in the Temple, their length was along the length of the house,22The Temple. except for the Ark, whose length was along the width of the house. That is the way its staves were placed, and that is the way that it was taken. How would they arrange them? After Shabbat,23The rods were removed before Shabbat, since neither the removal of the rods nor the insertion of the rods was done on Shabbat. one would enter, lift one end of a loaf, and place one rod under it and one in the middle, three beneath each and every loaf, and two under the top one, which had no burden upon it. The bottom one was placed on the table itself. Why would they place rods between them? It is so air would have free reign in their midst and the bread would not rot. Why were the rods crafted like half a hollow rod? It was so they would not be heavy upon the bread. That is why it is written in the command: “And its supports with which it shall be covered [yusakh]” (Exodus 25:29); that they would position the bread like a type of roofing [sukka], as each and every loaf would serve as roofing for the one that is beneath it. “The covering tubes” – these are the pillars. One crafts for it four pillars of gold, and its protrusions were there, upon which they would place the bottom loaf, two for this arrangement and two for that arrangement. This is because the loaves were similar to a ship, so that it would not wobble. The pillars were alongside with the bread so that the pillars would lift the bread from upon the table. What is it that the verse said: “The covering [hanasekh] tubes”? It is that they would raise the ends of the bottom loaves so they would not touch the table and they would serve as roofing [mesakot] over the table. But the middle of the bottom loaf would touch the table, because the loaves were shaped like a wobbling ship, sharp at the bottom and gradually widening above. “And the perpetual bread shall be upon it” – from here you learn that even during their travels the bread was upon it. “They shall spread upon them a cloth of scarlet wool” (Numbers 4:8) – upon the utensils and upon the bread. Then they would cover the table and all the utensils that were upon it with a covering of taḥash hide. They would insert its staves in order to carry it with them, as it is stated: “They shall cover it with a covering of taḥash hide, and shall insert its staves” (Numbers 4:8).

67. 4.15

    “They shall take a cloth of sky-blue wool, and cover the candelabrum of the illumination, and its lamps and its tongs” (Numbers 4:9). “They shall take a cloth of sky-blue wool, and cover the candelabrum of the illumination” (Numbers 4:9) – the candelabrum, too, because it stands in the Sanctuary, it and all its utensils that enter there were covered with a cloth of sky-blue wool. That is what is written: “They shall take a cloth of sky-blue wool and cover…” Regarding the candelabrum, one would not separate between it and its utensils. Then they would cover it and all its utensils with a covering of taḥash hide and place it on a pole, because it did not have staves with which they would carry it. That is what is written: “They shall place it and all its utensils [into a covering of the hide of a taḥash, and shall place it on a pole]” (Numbers 4:10).

68. 4.16

    “Upon the golden altar they shall spread a cloth of sky-blue wool, and cover it with a covering of the hide of a taḥash, and they shall place its staves” (Numbers 4:11). “Upon the golden altar they shall spread a cloth of sky-blue wool” – the golden altar, because it stood in the Sanctuary, they would cover it first with a cloth of sky-blue wool. Then they covered it with a covering of taḥash hide and placed its staves with which to carry it, as it is stated: “And cover it with a covering…” But they would not place its utensils with it, but rather, they would place them separately upon a cloth of sky-blue wool, cover them with a covering of taḥash hide, and place them on a pole in order to carry them upon it, as it is stated: “[They shall take] all the service utensils with which they serve [in the Sanctuary, and they shall place them in a cloth of sky-blue wool, and cover them with a covering of the hide of a taḥash, and they shall place them on the pole]” (Numbers 4:12). What were its utensils? They were a spoon and a coal pan, a spoon for the incense of the spices and the coal pan in which to place coals. He would place the coal pan with the coals upon the altar and pour the incense that was on the spoon into it upon the coals. That was the golden altar.

69. 4.17

    “They shall remove the ashes from the altar and spread a cloth of purple wool over it. They shall place upon it all its utensils with which they serve upon it the fire-pans, the forks, the shovels, and the basins, all the utensils of the altar; and they shall spread upon it a covering of the hide of a taḥash, and place its staves” (Numbers 4:13–14). The bronze altar that stood in the Courtyard, they would remove the ashes from upon it and would spread a cloth of purple wool to separate between it and the utensils that are placed upon it. That is what is written: “They shall remove the ashes from the altar and spread a cloth of purple wool over it.” The altar of the burnt offering, because it was not inside, they would not cover it with sky-blue wool, but rather with purple wool, because it would weave Israel from sin,24Buttress Israel against sin. as upon it they would sacrifice daily offerings each day and sin offerings, guilt offerings, burnt offerings, and peace offerings. After they would cover it they would place its utensils on it, as it is written: “They shall place upon it all its utensils with which they serve [upon it].” It was taught: “A perpetual fire” (Leviticus 6:6) – even on Shabbat, even in impurity; “it shall not be extinguished” (Leviticus 6:6) – even during journeys. What would they do to it? They would overturn a pot over it, this is the statement of Rabbi Yehuda. Rabbi Shimon says: Even during the journeys they would remove the ashes from the altar, as it is stated: “They shall remove the ashes from the altar.”25Sifra, Tzav 2:10. According to the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda, it works out well that this pot was not mentioned with the altar utensils on the journey, as it is stated: “The fire pans, the forks, the shovels, and the basins,” but it does not mention pots. Why? It is because they would overturn them over the fire. According to the opinion of Rabbi Shimon, “all the utensils of the altar,” is to include the pots. According to the opinion of Rabbi Shimon, “they shall remove the ashes from the altar” works out well. According to the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda, they would remove the ashes from it, they would place fire there, and then overturn the pot over it so that it would not be extinguished. Although there was a distinction between the vessels that were situated inside and the vessels standing outside regarding the cloth of sky-blue wool; however, regarding the taḥash, these and those are equal, as it is stated: “They shall spread upon it a covering of the hide of a taḥash, and place its staves.”

70. 4.18

    What did the Omnipresent see to command them so, the Ark first, then the table, after it the candelabrum, after it the golden altar, and after it the altar of the burnt offering? Our Rabbis said: Their dismantling at the time of the journeys was like their establishment at the time of encampment. Just as at the time of the erection of the Tabernacle26Likewise every time the Tabernacle was erected at the end of a journey. the Ark was first, as it is written: “He brought the Ark…” (Exodus 40:21); then, “he placed the table” (Exodus 40:22); then, “he placed the candelabrum” (Exodus 40:24); then, “he placed the golden altar” (Exodus 40:26); and then, “and the altar of the burnt offering, [he placed]” (Exodus 40:29), so in their dismantling: the Ark first, after it the table, after it the candelabrum, after it the golden altar, and after it the altar of the burnt offering. “Aaron and his sons shall conclude to cover the sacred, and all the sacred vessels, when the camp travels. Thereafter, the sons of Kehat shall come to bear, and they shall not touch the sacred and die. These are the burden of the sons of Kehat in the Tent of Meeting” (Numbers 4:15). “Aaron and his sons shall conclude to cover the sacred” – this is the Ark; “and all the sacred vessels” – these are the table, candelabrum, and the two altars and all their utensils. “When the camp travels” – they would do so only at the time of the journeys.

71. 4.19

    “Thereafter, the sons of Kehat shall come to bear…” – Moses said before God: Is the blood of the sons of Kehat safeguarded and the blood of the sons of Aaron unprotected? The Holy One blessed be He said to him: No; rather, Aaron is of the most sacred order, as it is stated: “Aaron was set apart to sanctify him as of the most sacred order” (I Chronicles 23:13), and the Ark is of the most sacred order. The most sacred order does not harm the most sacred order. However, the sons of Kehat are not of the most sacred order, but the Ark and all the vessels situated within are of the most sacred order, and they harm them. Therefore, the sons of Aaron must direct their attention so that the sons of Kehat will not die. “These are the burden of the sons of Kehat in the Tent of Meeting” – these are borne, but the rest of the vessels are not borne, but rather are in wagons. Likewise it says: “But to the sons of Kehat he did not give, [because the sacred service is upon them; they shall bear on the shoulder]” (Numbers 7:9).

72. 4.20

    “The charge of Elazar, son of Aaron the priest, is the illuminating oil, and the incense of the spices, and the meal offering of the daily offering, and the anointing oil: the charge of the entire Tabernacle, and of everything that is in it, in the sacred, and in its vessels” (Numbers 4:16). “The charge of Elazar, son of Aaron the priest…” – that is what is written: “Do not glorify yourself before a king, and do not stand in the place of the prominent” (Proverbs 25:6). If before a king of flesh and blood a person must conduct himself with humility, all the more so before the Omnipresent. We learned: Be bold like a leopard, nimble like an eagle, run like a deer, and be strong like a lion to perform the will of your Father in heaven,27Mishna Avot 5:20. to teach you that there is no haughtiness before the Omnipresent. Eliyahu said: Anyone who increases the glory of Heaven and minimizes his own glory, the glory of Heaven increases and his own glory increases. But anyone who minimizes the glory of Heaven and increases his own glory, the glory of Heaven remains as it was, and his glory is diminished. There was an incident involving a certain man who was standing in a synagogue and his son was standing opposite him. All the people were responding to the one who passes before the ark:28The prayer leader. Halleluya, and his son responded with words of frivolity. They said to him: ‘Look at your son, that he is responding with words of frivolity.’ He said to them: ‘What shall I do? He is a child, let him play.’ Again, the next day he acted in the same manner: All the people were responding to the prayer leader: Halleluya, and his son responded with words of frivolity. They said to him: ‘Look at your son, that he is responding with words of frivolity.’ He said to them: ‘What shall I do? He is a child, let him play.’ All those eight days of the festival, his son would respond with matters of frivolity, and he did not say anything to him. Not one year passed, not two, and not three until that man died, his wife died, his son and grandson died. Fifteen people from his house died, and only one pair of people remained: one crippled and blind, and a wicked imbecile. Again there was an incident, involving a certain person who regretted that he had not studied Bible or Mishna. One time, he was standing in a synagogue. When the one passing before the ark reached the sanctification of the Name, he raised his voice and said: “Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord of hosts” (Isaiah 6:3). They said to him: ‘What did you see that led you to raise your voice.’ He said to them: ‘I have been privileged to study neither Bible nor Mishna; now that I have been given permission, will I not raise my voice and my soul will be calmed?’ Not one year passed, not two, and not three until that man ascended from Babylonia to the Land of Israel. They appointed him commander of the emperor’s army and appointed him as the head of all the fortresses in the Land of Israel. They gave him a site, and he constructed a city and settled there. They called him Kilonai,29A term meaning that he did not have to pay taxes. him, his children, and his children’s children throughout all the generations. From here you learn that a person should not comport himself with haughtiness before the Omnipresent, as anyone who is haughty before Him will be debased. Likewise it says: “For those who honor Me I will honor, but those who scorn Me will be debased” (I Samuel 2:30). Likewise, you find regarding David king of Israel who did not conduct himself haughtily before the Omnipresent, but rather, he debased himself before Him like a commoner, in order to increase the glory of the Omnipresent. When? It was when he took up the Ark from the house of Avinadav in Giva to bring it to Jerusalem. That is what is written: “David again gathered all the chosen of Israel, thirty thousand.” (II Samuel 6:1). David said: I am not taking up the Ark secretly. He immediately consulted with the captains of thousands and of hundreds to send throughout the Land of Israel that they should gather to them and go to take up the Ark, as it is stated: “David consulted with the captains of thousands and of hundreds, with every high official” (I Chronicles 13:1). “David said to the entire congregation of Israel: If it pleases you, and if it is from the Lord our God…so that they gather themselves to us; and let us transfer the Ark of our God to us” (I Chronicles 13:2–3). They all said to him: ‘Do as you wish,’ as it is stated: “The entire congregation said to do so, for the matter was upright in the eyes of the entire people” (I Chronicles 13:4). Immediately, he sent and gathered all of Israel that was in the entire Land of Israel, as it is stated: “David assembled all Israel, from Shiḥor of Egypt until Levo Ḥamat, to bring the Ark of God from Kiryat Ye’arim” (I Chronicles 13:5). How many elders did David appoint there? Rabbi Yirmeya ben Elazar and Rabbi Berekhya said in the name of Rabbi Abba bar Kahana: David appointed ninety thousand elders on that day, but he did not appoint Aḥitofel with them. He sanctified them so they would serve as an honor guard before it. That is what is written: “David again [vayosef od] gathered all the chosen of Israel, thirty thousand.” “Vayosef” – thirty thousand; “od” – thirty thousand; and the plain meaning of the verse, thirty thousand; that is ninety thousand. Immediately, they went to Giva to take up the Ark from there, as it is stated: “David and all the people who were with him from Baalei Yehuda rose and went [to take up from there the Ark of God]” (II Samuel 6:2). One verse says: “David and all Israel went up to Baala, to Kiryat Ye’arim which is of Judah, to take up from there the Ark of God, the Lord who is seated amidst the cherubs, upon which the Name is called” (I Chronicles 13:6). And one verse says: “David and all the people who were with him from Baalei Yehuda…” How can these two verses coexist? All Israel went to Baala, which is Kiryat Ye’arim, and waited there for the Ark, until they would bring it from Giva. But David and the elders set out from Baalei Yehuda, which is Baala, which is Kiryat Ye’arim, and went after the Ark to Giva to bring it from Giva to Kiryat Ye’arim, which is Baala. From Baala, all of Israel took it with them to Jerusalem. Some say: Initially they decided they would go only to Baala and send from there to the house of Avinadav, which was in Giva, to take up the Ark of God from there to Kiryat Ye’arim. From there they would all ascend with it to Jerusalem. When he was there, he said to them: ‘It is not in keeping with the honor due the Ark that it should come with individuals. Rather, let us all go there.’ That is why it is written: “David and all the people…rose and went” (II Samuel 6:2). Why did he initially go only to Baala, which is Kiryat Ye’arim? It is because Giva and Kiryat Ye’arim were located in one area, which is where the Givonites were settled, as it is stated: “The children of Israel traveled, and they came to their cities on the third day. Their cities were Givon, Kefira, Be’erot, and Kiryat Ye’arim” (Joshua 9:17). Kiryat Ye’arim fell into the portion of Judah, as it is enumerated in the portion of its inheritance: “Kiryat Baal, which is Kiryat Ye’arim” (Joshua 15:60), and it was the border between Judah and Benjamin, as it says regarding the border of Benjamin: “Its terminus was at Kiryat Baal, which is Kiryat Ye'arim, a city of the children of Judah…” (Joshua 18:14). But Giva, where the Ark was, was on the border of Benjamin, as it is written regarding the cities of Benjamin: “Givon, Rama, and Be’erot; and Mitzpe, Kefira, and Motza” (Joshua 18:25–26). That is why they initially came to Kiryat Ye’arim, which is on the border between Judah and Benjamin, and then they went to Givon. “Which is called the Name, the name of the Lord of hosts” (II Samuel 6:2) – Rabbi Yoḥanan said in the name of Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai: It teaches that the Name and all His appellations are placed in the Ark. Rav Huna said: It teaches that the tablets and the shards of the tablets are placed in the Ark. “They mounted the Ark of God [onto a new wagon]” (II Samuel 6:3) – they did not carry it as it is in the Torah, as it is written: “But to the sons of Kehat he did not give [because the sacred service is upon them, they shall bear on the shoulder]” (Numbers 7:9). Why was he punished to have been rendered oblivious to the verse? It is because he called matters of Torah “songs,” as it is stated: “Your statutes were songs to me…” (Psalms 119:54). The Holy One blessed be He said to him: Matters of Torah in whose regard it is written: “If you cast [hata’if] your eyes on it, it is gone” (Proverbs 23:5),30This verse is expounded to mean: If you close your eyes from matters of Torah they will be forgotten. The root ayin-yod-peh in Aramaic means double, so the verse can be understood as: If you double your eyes, meaning cover them with your eyelids. you call them songs? I will cause you to fail regarding a matter that even schoolchildren know: “But to the sons of Kehat he did not give…,” and he brings it in a wagon. The Ark lifted the priests31The reference is to the priests who were carrying the Ark to the wagon. high and slammed them to the ground, lifted the priests high and slammed them to the ground. David sent and summoned Aḥitofel; he said to him: ‘Will you not say to me what we shall do with this Ark, as it is lifting the priests high and slamming them to the ground, lifting the priests high and slamming them to the ground?’ He said to him: ‘Send and ask those wise men whom you appointed.’ David said: ‘One who knows how to stop it and does not stop it, will ultimately be strangled.’ He said to him: ‘Slaughter offerings before it, and it will stop.’ The Holy One blessed be He said to Aḥitofel: ‘A matter that the children say in the synagogue each day: “But to the sons of Kehat he did not give…” you did not say to him, but this great matter you said to him: Slaughter offerings before it, and it will stop?’ That is why he was slaughtering when he took it up the second time, so he would not experience this, as it is stated: “It was, when [the bearers of the Ark of the Lord] walked [six paces, that he would slaughter a bull and a fatling]” (II Samuel 6:13). Uza and Aḥyo were driving the wagon, as it is stated: “They conveyed it from the house of Avinadav…[Uza and Aḥyo, sons of Avinadav, were driving the new wagon]” (II Samuel 6:3), Uza after it and Aḥyo before it. “They conveyed it from the house of Avinadav that was in Giva, [with the Ark of God, and Aḥyo was walking before the Ark]” (II Samuel 6:4). To what is the verse “They conveyed it from the house of Avinadav” referring? What did they carry with it? It was a chest that the Philistines sent, a gift to the God of Israel,32I Samuel 6:7–12. upon which a Torah scroll was placed, like that which we learned: The Ark that Moses crafted: “Its length two and a half cubits, and its width one and a half cubits, and its height one and a half cubits” (Exodus 25:10) – with a cubit containing six handbreadths. The length of the tablets was six handbreadths, their width six, and their thickness three. They were placed along the length of the Ark. How much did the tablets fill? It was twelve handbreadths. Three handbreadths remained. Deduct from them one handbreadth, half for this wall and half for that wall. Two handbreadths remained in which the Torah scroll was placed, as it is stated: “There was in the Ark nothing [ein] but [rak] the two tablets [of stone]” (I Kings 8:9). Ein rak, an exclusion after an exclusion33One of the rules used to interpret verses in the Torah is that when an exclusion is followed by another exclusion it comes to teach that there is something which has to be included. (Yoma 43a). is only to include the Torah scroll that was placed in the Ark. You have accounted for the Ark by its length; come account for the Ark by its width. How much did the tablets fill in the Ark? It was six handbreadths. Deduct from them one handbreadth, half for this wall and half for that wall. Two handbreadths remained so that the Torah scroll would enter and exit without difficulty. This is the statement of Rabbi Meir. Rabbi Yehuda says: It is with a cubit containing five handbreadths. The length of the tablets was six handbreadths, their width six, and their thickness three. They were placed along the length of the Ark. How much did the tablets fill in the Ark? It was twelve handbreadths. One half handbreadth remained; one fingerbreadth and one half for this wall and one fingerbreadth and one half for that wall.34A handbreadth is four fingerbreadths if one measures with the thumb, five with the index finger, and six with the pinkie. The midrash here is using the measure of six fingerbreadths to a handbreadth. You have accounted for the Ark by its length, come account for the Ark by its width. How much did the tablets fill in the Ark? It was six handbreadths. One handbreadth and one half remained. Deduct from them half one handbreadth, one fingerbreadth and one half for this wall and one fingerbreadth and one half for that wall. One handbreadth remained, in which the pillars stood, as it is stated: “King [Solomon] made himself a palanquin.… He crafted its pillars of silver…” (Song of Songs 3:9–10).35“King Solomon [hamelekh Shelomo] made himself [lo] a palanquin” is expounded as a reference to the Ark of the King, to whom peace belongs [hamelekh shehashalom shelo]. The chest that the Philistines sent as a gift to the God of Israel was placed at its side, as it is stated: “Place the gold objects that you are returning to Him as a guilt offering in a chest at its side, and send it and it will go” (I Samuel 6:8). Upon it, the Torah scroll was placed, as it is stated: “Take this scroll of the Torah, [and place it at the side of the Ark]” (Deuteronomy 31:26). It was placed at its side and not inside it.36Bava Batra 14a. How, then, do I realize: “There was in the Ark nothing [ein] but [rak] the two tablets” (I Kings 8:9)? It is to include the shards of the tablets, which were placed in the Ark, because the whole tablets and the shattered tablets were placed on their sides in the Ark, as they were only three handbreadths thick. Before the chest there was a shelf that protruded from the Ark, on which the Torah scroll was placed. That is what is written: “They conveyed it from the house of Avinadav […with the Ark of God]” (II Samuel 6:4) – this is the chest upon which the Torah scroll was placed and was standing at the side of the Ark of the Covenant of the Lord. “Aḥyo was walking before the Ark” (II Samuel 6:4) – from here they said: Aḥyo was walking before it. When they were taking it up, ninety thousand elders were walking before it, the priests were bearing it,37The priests placed it in the wagon, and the wagon was led by priests. Uza and Aḥyo were apparently priests (Maharzu). the Levites were playing instruments, and all Israel were reveling; one who had a palm branch in his hand, one who had a drum or a musical instrument. That is what is written: “David and the entire house of Israel were reveling before the Lord [with all kinds of juniper wood, with harps, with lyres, with drums, with timbrels [uvimenaanim], and with cymbals]” (II Samuel 6:5). This is a reference to a palm branch with which a person waves [menaane’a]. “They came to the threshing floor of Nakhon” (II Samuel 6:6) – “Kidon” (I Chronicles 13:9) is written and “Nakhon” is written. Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Initially Kidon38Kidon means spear, an instrument of death, as it caused Uza’s death. but ultimately Nakhon.39Nakhon means firmly established, after bringing blessing to the house of Oved Edom. “Uza reached out to the Ark of God [and took hold of it]” (II Samuel 6:6) – the Holy One blessed be He said to him: The Ark bears its bearers; itself all the more so, as it is written: “It was when the entire people had finished crossing, the Ark of the Lord and the priests passed before the people” (Joshua 4:11) – the Ark bore its bearers and crossed. “Because the cattle had stumbled” (II Samuel 6:6( – why did they stumble? It was because they were taking it in contravention of the Torah. They should have taken it on the shoulder, but they loaded it onto a wagon and it proceeded on its own. “The wrath of the Lord was enflamed against Uza, and God smote him there al hashal” (II Samuel 6:7) – what is “al hashal”? Rabbi Yoḥanan and Rabbi Elazar: One said: Over matters of unwitting actions, and one said: Because he tended to his needs before it.40Some say that on a previous occasion he relieved himself before the Ark. Others say that his focus was on personal matters rather than on the matter of the Ark. “And he died there with the Ark of God” (II Samuel 6:7) – Rabbi Yoḥanan said: Uza will enter the World to Come, as it is stated: “With the Ark of God”; just as the Ark is in existence in the World to Come, so too, Uza will enter the World to Come. “David was distressed [vayiḥar] because the Lord had lashed out [in a breach against Uza]” (II Samuel 6:8) – what is vayiḥar? Rabbi Elazar said: It is that David’s face changed and resembled a loaf baked on coals [ḥarara].41Wrinkled, dry, and black. What is the reason? It is because af is not written with it.42Typically the word vayiḥar is followed by the word af (see the previous verse), and together they mean: His wrath was enflamed. Here, vayiḥar is not followed by af. Therefore, the Sages attribute an additional meaning to it. Immediately, David feared to bring it to his home, as it is stated: “David feared the Lord on that day, and he said: How can the Ark of the Lord come to me?” (II Samuel 6:9). What did David do? He diverted it to the home of Oved Edom to remain there, as it is stated: “David was unwilling to transfer the Ark of the Lord to him…and David diverted it to the home of Oved Edom the Gitite” (II Samuel 6:10). Oved Edom was a Levite, as it attributes his lineage with the Levites. Oved Edom and his brethren were sixty-two.43See I Chronicles 26:8. Why was his name called Oved? It is because he served [avad] before the Lord properly. Edom, because he reddened [shehedim] David’s face. He was fearful of the Ark lest it kill him, and he serves before it, and the Holy One blessed be He blessed him. “The Gitite” – it is because he was from Gat. When David returned to Jerusalem, Aḥitofel came and said to him: David, should you not have learned from a small verse that the children read: “But to the sons of Kehat he did not give, [because the service of the sacred objects was upon them; they bore them upon their shoulders]” (Numbers 7:9)? The Levites bear the Ark; the priests do not bear the Ark. On a shoulder they bear the Ark, not on a wagon. From where is it derived that this is so? For you find when he took it up the second time, there was neither priest nor wagon there, as it is stated: “Then David said not to bear the Ark of God, other than the Levites” (I Chronicles 15:2). And it is written: “The children of the Levites bore the Ark of God [as Moses had commanded in accordance with the word of the Lord, on their shoulders with the poles on them]” (I Chronicles 15:15). “The Ark of the Lord stayed in the house of Oved Edom the Gitite” (II Samuel 6:11) – our Rabbis said: There were two items that were sacred and great, but people believed that they were harsh. So as not to disseminate slander in their regard, it wrote a conspicuous instance of praise and blessing in their regard. These are: Incense and the Ark. Incense, so that a person would not say that the incense is harsh. It was by its means that Nadav and Avihu died; by its means the assembly of Koraḥ were burned; by its means Uziyahu was afflicted with leprosy. That is why the Holy One blessed be He wrote a significant virtue regarding the incense, that Israel was saved by its means, as it is stated: “Aaron took as Moses had spoken, and ran into the midst of the assembly, [and behold, the plague had begun among the people; he placed the incense, and atoned for the people. He stood between the dead and the living, and the plague was checked]” (Numbers 17:12–13). The Ark, so that a person will not say that the Ark is harsh. It smote the Philistines, it killed the residents of Beit Shemesh, it killed Uza. That is why it wrote a blessing in its regard, as it is stated: “The Ark of the Lord stayed [in the house of Oved Edom the Gitite for three months, and the Lord blessed Oved Edom and his entire household]” (II Samuel 6:11). It is to teach you that incense and the Ark do not kill, but rather sins kill. With what did the Holy One blessed be He bless the home of Oved Edom? Rabbi Yosei says: With children; that is what is written: “Oved Edom had sons: Shemaya the firstborn…Yoaḥ the third, and Sakhar the fourth, and Netanel.… Peuletai the eighth, [for God had blessed him]” (I Chronicles 26:4–5). They asked before Rabbi Yoḥanan: What is Peuletai? He said to them: It is because he performed a great action [peula] on behalf of the Torah. What great action did he perform? He would kindle a lamp before the Ark, one lamp in the morning and one lamp in the evening. Rabbi Yosei rendered it words of parting: If for the Ark that did not eat and drink and requires attention only due to the two tablets that were in it, the home of Oved Edom the Gitite was privileged to be blessed on account of it, one who receives Sages and students with food, drink, and made beds, all the more so that the Holy One blessed be He will pay him his reward. They said regarding Oved Edom: He had eight sons and eight daughters-in-law, and each and every one of them would give birth to two in one month. How so? She would be impure for seven,44Seven days. pure for seven, and give birth; impure for seven, pure for seven, and give birth. Sixteen for each month; for three months that is forty-eight. The sons of Shemaya were six, as it is written: “To Shemaya his son were born sons.… The sons of Shemaya: Otni…” (I Chronicles 26:6–7);45According to the midrash, these six sons of Shemaya were born before the Ark arrived. that is fifty-four. His eight, as it is written: “Oved Edom had sons…” (I Chronicles 26:4–5), that is sixty-two. That is what is written: “All these were of the sons of Oved Edom, they and their sons and their brethren, capable men with strength for the service: sixty-two for Oved Edom.” (I Chronicles 26:8). That is, “for God had blessed him” (I Chronicles 26:5). That is why it is stated: “[The Ark of God remained with the household of Oved Edom, in his house three months,] and the Lord blessed the house of Oved Edom…” (I Chronicles 13:14). David heard after three months that the Holy One blessed be He had blessed Oved Edom and his household. He gathered the elders of Israel, the leaders, and the leaders of the priests and Levites to take up the Ark with great rejoicing, as it is written: “It was told to King David, saying: The Lord has blessed the house of Oved Edom…[David went and took up the Ark of God from the house of Oved Edom to the City of David with rejoicing]” (II Samuel 6:12). And one verse says: “David, and the elders of Israel, [and the captains of thousands, who were walking to take up the Ark of the Covenant of the Lord from the house of Oved Edom, were joyful]” (I Chronicles 15:25). Who took it up? The Levites took it up. When David saw that the Levites took it up and were not harmed, as Aḥitofel had said to him, he added and slaughtered more offerings before it as Aḥitofel had said initially. That is what is written: “It was as God helped the Levites, [carriers of the Ark of the Covenant of the Lord, and they sacrificed seven bulls and seven rams]” (I Chronicles 15:26). One verse says: “They sacrificed seven bulls and seven rams” (I Chronicles 15:26). And one verse says: “It was when [the bearers of the Ark of the Lord] would walk six paces, he would slaughter a bull and a fatling” (II Samuel 6:13). Rabbi Ḥanina and Rabbi Mana: One said: For each pace a bull and a fatling, and after seven, seven bulls and seven rams. And one said: For each pace seven bulls and seven rams, and at the end a bull and a fatling. The Rabbis say: One verse explains the other: For each seven46It should read six paces (Matnot Kehuna). paces, seven bulls and seven rams.47Jerusalem Talmud, Sanhedrin 10:2. Rav Pappa bar Shmuel said: For each and every pace, a bull and a fatling; for every six steps seven bulls and seven rams. Rav Ḥisda said to him: If so, you have filled the entire Land of Israel with altars. Rather, Rav Ḥisda said: For every six paces, a bull and a fatling, and for every six sets of six paces, seven bulls and seven rams.48Sota 35b. “David was dancing before the Lord with all his might” (II Samuel 6:14) – come and see to what extent David debased himself for the glory of the Holy One blessed be He. David should have been walking before it like a king clad in his royal garments. [He was] not, but rather David donned fine garments in honor of the Ark and reveled before it in any describable manner saying whatever he could say, as it is stated: “David was wrapped in a fine linen robe along with all the Levites who were bearing the Ark…[upon David there was an ephod of linen]” (I Chronicles 15:27). And it is written: “David was mekharker before the Lord bekhol oz” (II Samuel 6:14) – what is “bekhol oz”? It is with all his might. What is “mekharker”? It is that he was clapping his hands one upon the other and saying: Exalted Lord [kiri ram]. Israel were shouting and sounding the shofars, trumpets, and all musical instruments, as it is stated: “All the house of Israel were taking up the Ark of the Lord with shouting and with the sounding of the shofar” (II Samuel 6:15). And one verse says: “All Israel were taking up the Ark of the Covenant of the Lord [with shouts, and with sound of a shofar, and with trumpets, and with cymbals, sounding with lyres and harps]” (I Chronicles 15:28). When they arrived in Jerusalem, all the women were peering at David from the rooftops and from the windows and saw him dancing and reveling, but he did not care. That is what is written: “It was, as the Ark of the Lord was entering the City of David [that Mikhal daughter of Saul peered through the window]” (II Samuel 6:16). You see that his wife was peering at him. From where is it derived that the same is true of all the women of Jerusalem? It is as she says: “How honorable today is the king of Israel, who was exposed today before the eyes of the maidservants of his servants” (II Samuel 6:20). “She saw King David mefazez umkharker…” (II Samuel 6:16) – when she saw him conducting himself like a commoner, he was contemptible in her eyes. What is mefazez umkharker? What would he do? Our Rabbis said: He was wearing refined gold garments similar to pure gold [paz]. He would strike his hands one on another and clap, and he would cry kiri ram. He would mefazez. What is mefazez? The refined gold that was on him would produce a clinking sound. Could it be that David did not do any more than that? No. Rather, he would reverse his cloak and leap before it, as it is written elsewhere: “And saw King David dancing and reveling…” (I Chronicles 15:29). All the women were peering at him from the rooftops and the windows, and he did not care. From where do you learn that David would reverse his cloak and leap?49The midrash returns to this question later. It is as you find that once they took it into the City of David, they displayed it in the place that David had prepared for it, and he and Israel offered up burnt offerings before it, as it is written: “They brought the Ark of the Lord, and they displayed it [in its place, within the tent that David had pitched for it]” (II Samuel 6:17). Elsewhere it is written: “They presented burnt offerings and peace offerings before God” (I Chronicles 16:1) – after he concluded the offering, he blessed the entire people because they honored the Ark. He gave gifts to them all as an expression of joy for the Ark, and to the women, as it is stated: “David concluded offering up the burnt offerings and the peace offerings, [and he blessed the people in the name of the Lord of hosts]. He distributed to all the people, to the entire multitude of Israel, [both men and women, to each, one loaf of bread, one portion of beef [eshpar], and one raisin cake [ashisha]]” (II Samuel 6:18–19). What is eshpar? It is one-sixth [eḥad mishisha] of a bull [bapar]; ashisha, one-sixth of an ephah. Some say: Ashisha – a cask of wine, just as it says: “And lovers of goblets [ashishei] of grapes” (Hosea 3:1). After all Israel took their leave from him, he turned to bless his household and to bring them joy, due to the overwhelming celebration of the Ark. Mikhal emerged to meet him and disgraced him for debasing himself before the eyes of the women in honor of the Ark. That is what is written: “David returned to bless his household. [Mikhal daughter of Saul came out to meet David, and she said: How honorable today was the king of Israel, who was exposed today before the eyes of the maidservants of his servants, in the manner that one of the idlers is exposed]” (II Samuel 6:20). She did not enable him to enter into the house, but she went out and verbally lambasted him. “She said: How honorable today was the king of Israel, who was exposed today before the eyes of the maidservants of his servants.” From here you learn that he reversed his cloak and leapt, as she said to him: “Who was exposed today.” She began instigating a quarrel with him, seeking to utterly shame him. She said to him: ‘Have you seen your glory?’ “How honorable today was the king of Israel”? ‘Now you have let it be known that you are king?’ “Who was exposed today” – if only it had been privately, but rather it was “before the eyes of the maidservants of his servants.” These are the women of Israel, whom she characterizes as maidservants. “In the manner that one of the idlers is exposed” – Rabbi Abba bar Kahana said: The idlest of the idlers is the dancing jester, as there is no one idler than he is from any mitzva. That is how David was dancing before the Ark. She said to him: ‘Today the glory of father’s household has been revealed. Come and see what the difference is between you and father’s household. All members of my father’s household were modest and holy.’ They said about the household of Saul that neither heel nor big toe of theirs was ever seen. That is what is written: “He came to the sheep enclosures upon the way, and there was a cave there. Saul came [to relieve himself]” (I Samuel 24:3). What is, “he came to the sheep enclosures [gidrot]”? Rabbi Avin in the name of Rabbi Elazar: He entered a sheep pen, a gate within a gate. “Saul came to relieve himself [lehasekh et raglav]” – he made himself like a booth [sukka], wrapped in flowing robes and sat in the lavatory. He would lower his garment a bit and raise it a bit, lower it a bit and raise it a bit. David said: It is not proper to harm so modest a body. That is what is written that he said to him: “Behold, this day your eyes have seen that the Lord delivered you today into my hand in the cave, and one said to kill you, and I vataḥas on you” (I Samuel 24:10). It is not written here, “I had compassion [vaaḥus] on you,” but rather, “it has compassion [vataḥas] on you” – your modesty caused there to be compassion on you. That is what Mikhal said to him: ‘The members of father’s household were so modest, and you stand and expose your garment like one of the idlers.’ When she finished her words, he said to her: ‘Was I reveling before a king of flesh and blood? Was it not before the King of kings that I was reveling, who chose me over your father and his entire household? Were your father more righteous than I, would God have chosen me and rejected your father’s household?’ That is what is written: “David said to Mikhal: Before the Lord, [who chose me over your father and over his entire household, to appoint me ruler over the people of the Lord, over Israel, I will revel before the Lord]” (II Samuel 6:21). He said to her: ‘Your father was king over Israel alone; I am ruler over Israel and Judah.’ That is what is written: “Over the people of the Lord” – this is the tribe of Judah. “Over Israel” – these are the rest of the tribes. Another matter: He said to her: ‘The members of your father’s household sought their own glory and forsook the glory of Heaven. I do not do so, but rather, I forsake my own glory and seek the glory of Heaven.’ That is what is written: “I would be demeaned even more than this, [and I would be lowly in my eyes; but with the maidservants of whom you spoke, with them, I would be honored]” (II Samuel 6:22). ‘Do not say that I was lowly in the eyes of others and not contemptible in my perception’; the verse states: “And I would be lowly in my eyes.” “But with the maidservants of whom you spoke, with them, I would be honored” – he said to her: ‘Those women whom you characterized as maidservants are not maidservants [amahot], but mothers [imahot]. If only I will have a portion with them in the future.’ That is what is written: “But with the maidservants of whom you spoke” – if only, “with them, I would be honored.” Because Mikhal said this, she was punished, as it is written thereafter: “Mikhal daughter of Saul did not have a child until the day of her death” (II Samuel 6:23). But is it not written: “Yitre’am, to Egla his wife” (I Chronicles 3:3)? She lowed like a calf [egla] and died.50The reference is to Mikhal and that she died in childbirth. That is what is written: “[Mikhal…did not have a child] until the day of her death” – but on the day of her death she had. There is no person in Israel who debased himself for the mitzvot more than David. That is what is written that he said: “Lord, my heart was not haughty” (Psalms 131:1) – when Samuel anointed me as king; “nor my eyes lofty” (Psalms 131:1) – when I killed Goliath; “and I did not aspire to greatness” (Psalms 131:1) – when they restored me to my kingdom; “or to what is beyond me” (Psalms 131:1) – when I took up the Ark. “Instead I have composed and quieted my soul, like a weaned child on his mother” (Psalms 131:2) – just as this child is not ashamed to be exposed before his mother, so, I have composed myself before You that I was not ashamed to debase myself before You in Your honor. “My soul is like a weaned child” (Psalms 131:2) – like this infant who emerges from his mother’s womb, and he has no haughtiness of spirit to refrain from nursing from his mother’s breasts, so my soul is upon me, as I am not ashamed to study Torah from the insignificant of Israel. Rabbi Ada bar Rabbi Ḥanina said: The Holy One blessed be He said to him: ‘You have rendered yourself like a weaned child; as you live, just as this child has no iniquities, so, you have no iniquities, as it is stated: “The Lord has expunged your sin; you will not die” (II Samuel 12:13). From here you learn that a person may not comport himself with haughtiness before the Omnipresent, but rather, he should debase himself for His glory. Rabbi Yehuda HaLevi bar Rabbi Shalom said: The actions of the Holy One blessed be He are unlike the actions of flesh and blood. Why? The cook of flesh and blood has fine garments. When he goes out to the marketplace he wears them, but when he stands and cooks, he removes the nice ones and wears tatters and an apron. Moreover, when he sweeps the stove and the oven, he wears lower-quality garments than those. But before the Holy One blessed be He, when the priest sweeps the altar and removes the ashes, he dons excellent garments, as it is stated: “The priest shall don his linen vestments…” (Leviticus 6:3), so that “he shall remove the ashes” (Leviticus 6:3). Why is it so? It is only to inform you that there is no haughtiness before the Omnipresent. Likewise, you find that Elazar the priest would comport himself with humility before the Omnipresent. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said: Elazar was the head of heads, the prince of princes, as it is stated: “The prince of the princes of the Levites was Elazar son of Aaron the priest…” (Numbers 3:32). See the authority that he possessed, and you assume that because he was a prominent man he would delegate others to bear the vessels that he was supposed to bear. No; rather, he himself would bear them, as it is stated: “The charge of Elazar son of Aaron the priest [is the illuminating oil, and the incense of the spices, and the meal offering of the daily offering, and the anointing oil]” (Numbers 4:16). How did he bear all these? Our Rabbis said: This is how he bore them: The anointing oil in his right, the incense of the spices in his left, and the meal offering of the daily offering of the morning was suspended from his forearm. Where was the one brought in the afternoon placed? Rabbi Aḥa said that Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai said: He would suspend a type of small bowl from his belt, because his loins were girded with a belt like a servant before his master. This is to inform you that there is no haughtiness before God. “The charge of the entire Tabernacle, and of all that is in it, in the sacred, and in its vessels” (Numbers 4:16) – as it was he who would give them the Ark, the table, the candelabrum, and the altars and all their utensils, just as it says: “Their commission: The Ark, [the table, the candelabrum, the altars, and the sacred vessels with which they would serve, and the screen, and all its work]. The prince of the princes of the Levites was Elazar…” (Numbers 3:31–32).

73. 5.1

    “Do not cut off the tribe of the Kehatite families from among the Levites” (Numbers 4:18). “Do not cut off the tribe of the Kehatite families from among the Levites” (Numbers 4:18). That is what is written: “Behold, the eye of the Lord is on those who fear Him, on those who await His kindness, to deliver them from death, and to sustain them in famine” (Psalms 33:18–19). “Behold, the eye of the Lord is on those who fear Him,” this is the tribe of Levi, who sit and hope for the kindness of the Holy One blessed be He. Do all people not long for the kindness of the Holy One blessed be He? It is, rather, more so regarding the tribe of Levi, as they did not receive a portion in the Land. Rather, they sit and pray that the Land of Israel will produce its produce so they can take tithes, as they have nothing in the world other than the kindness of the Holy One blessed be He. That is, “on those who await His kindness.” “To deliver them from death,” from death itself, “and to sustain them in famine,” these are twenty-four gifts of the priesthood, which were given to the tribe of Levi: ten in the Temple, ten in the provinces, and four in Jerusalem. That is, “and to sustain them in famine.” Rabbi Elazar ben Pedat said: From what death were they delivered? If it was from death of this world, there is no creature that does not die. What is “to deliver them from death”? It is from death by the Ark. How so? Rabbi Elazar ben Pedat said in the name of Rabbi Yosei ben Zimra: When Israel was traveling, two sparks of fire would emerge from the midst of the two staves of the Ark in order to smite their enemies. From where is it derived? It is as Moses said to Israel: ‘Why do you fear the giants; are they tougher than those who would come against us and the Ark would burn them?’1See Deuteronomy 9:1–3 where Moses tell Israel not to fear the giants because of the devouring fire which passes before them. Likewise, it says: “You shall know today that the Lord your God is He who passes before you, [a devouring fire]” (Deuteronomy 9:3). From here, you expound that two sparks would precede them. He said to them: “He will destroy them, and He will subdue them before you” (Deuteronomy 9:3). Since the sparks would emerge, the fire would graze the bearers of the Ark and they would be burned and decrease in number. From where is it derived that the tribe of Kehat diminished in number? You find that three families would bear all the Tabernacle vessels. [The family of] Gershon bore all the woven materials: sheets, curtain, the screen, and the hangings. The family of Kehat would bear the Ark, the table, the candelabrum, the altars, and the sacred vessels. [The family of] Merari would bear the beams, the bars, the pillars, and the bases. You find that these four2The fourth family was Moses, Aaron and his children, who camped by themselves to the east of the Tabernacle. They were included in the count of Kehat. families were counted from one month old and from thirty years old. When he counts the Gershonites, he counts them from one month old, and finds them “seven thousand five hundred” (Numbers 3:22). He then counted them from thirty years old and finds them “two thousand six hundred and thirty” (Numbers 4:40). They were one hundred and thirty more than one-third. Likewise, Merari, he counts them from one month old, and their total comes to “six thousand two hundred” (Numbers 3:34). When he attributes them from thirty years old, he finds them “three thousand two hundred” (Numbers 4:44). They were one hundred more than half of them. But the family of Kehat, you find them most numerous of all the families, as from one month old he counts them and finds them “eight thousand six hundred” (Numbers 3:28). When he came from thirty years old, he finds them “two thousand seven hundred and fifty” (Numbers 4:36). They were less than one-third, by one hundred and seventeen. Why was it so? It is, rather, as Rabbi Elazar ben Pedat said in the name of Rabbi Yosei ben Zimra: When Israel was traveling; two sparks of fire would emerge from the midst of the two staves and graze the bearers of the Ark and they would decrease in number. Each and every one of them was running; this one would take the table, this one would take the candelabrum, this one would take the altars, but they would flee from the Ark because it would harm them. It was as though the Ark was treated with contempt and the Holy One blessed be He would become angry with them, and again they would be eradicated. The Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: ‘How am I killing the sons of Kehat?I If they bear it, they decrease in number, if they do not bear it, there is anger directed at them.’ The Holy One blessed be He said to Moses and to Aaron: ‘Institute a remedy for the sons of Kehat so they will not be cut off from the world, so they will not abandon and flee. “Do not cut off the tribe …” Rather, let Aaron and his sons come: “Assign them, each man to his service and to his burden” (Numbers 4:19), so that they will be unable to switch from service to service and from burden to burden.’ That is what is written: “But do this for them, and they will live, [and will not die upon their approaching the Holy of Holies. Aaron and his sons shall come, and assign them, each man to his service and to his burden]” (Numbers 4:19). Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman said: God forbid, the sons of Kehat would not abandon the Ark and run to the table and the candelabrum; rather, even though they would decrease in number, they would give their lives for the sake of the Ark. If so, why was He cautioning them: “Do not cut off the tribe…”? Rather, it was because they knew that anyone who bears the Ark, his reward is great; they would abandon the table, the candelabrum, and the altars, and they would all run to the Ark to receive a reward. As a result, this one would quarrel and say: ‘I will bear here,’ and that one would quarrel and say: ‘I will bear here,’ and as a result, they would act with levity and the Divine Presence would harm them. God said to Moses: ‘Institute a remedy for the sons of Kehat so they will not be eradicated from the world. “Do not cut off…” Rather, have them assigned to their service and to their burden so they will not quarrel with one another.’ Moses instituted a remedy, but they were quarreling with one another: This one would say: ‘I will bear the Ark,’ and that one would say: ‘I will bear it,’ and one would not know what was fixed for him, what was his burden. The Holy One blessed be He said, and consequently Aaron and his sons would enter and give each and every one his burden, as it is stated: “Aaron and his sons shall come, and assign them...”

74. 5.2

    Another matter, “do not cut off,” that is what is written: “Do not rob the impoverished as he is impoverished…” (Proverbs 22:22). Our Rabbis say: Regarding what is the verse speaking? If he is impoverished, what does he steal from him? Rather, it spoke only of gifts to the poor that he is obligated to give them by Torah law; gleanings, forgotten sheaves, produce in the corner of the field, and the tithe of the poor. The Holy One blessed be He cautioned that no person should rob them of the gifts that are fit to give them. “As he is impoverished,” his poverty is sufficient for him. Is it not enough for the wealthy person that he exists in comfort and the poor person in suffering, but he even robs from him what the Holy One blessed be He gave him? “And do not oppress the poor at the gate” (Proverbs 22:22). Just as it says: “You shall not distort the judgment [of your poor in his dispute]” (Exodus 23:6), and it says: “[You shall not afflict] any widow [or orphan]” (Exodus 22:21), “for the Lord will fight their battle and will deprive of life those who deprive them” (Proverbs 22:23), likewise, it says: “If you afflict him, [then when he cries out to Me, I will hear his cry]. My wrath will be enflamed, and I will kill [you with the sword]” (Exodus 22:22–23). Another matter, “do not rob,” it is speaking of the tribe of Levi. Why does it call them impoverished? It is because they were more impoverished in number than all the tribes. You have none of the tribes that was as few in number as Manasseh, as their number totaled only “thirty-two thousand two hundred” (Numbers 1:35), and those counted were from twenty years old until sixty years old, excluding those who were from one month old until twenty, and excluding those from sixty years and above. However, the entire tribe of Levi was from one month and above only twenty-two thousand three hundred, plus Aaron and his sons. Why? It is because they were adjacent to the sacred; anyone who was not appropriately careful, the attribute of justice would harm them. The Holy One blessed be He said to Israel: ‘They keep the commission of the sacred so that you will not be harmed, and their numbers dwindle for you. Do not rob from them the gifts that I gave them, because he is impoverished.’ Moreover, they are impoverished from an inheritance, as they did not take a portion in the Land with you, as it is stated: “But to the tribe of Levi, Moses did not give an inheritance” (Joshua 13:33). “To the children of Levi, behold, I have given all tithes in Israel as an inheritance…[The children of Israel] shall no longer approach the Tent of Meeting]… The Levite himself shall perform the service of the Tent of Meeting” (Numbers 18:21–23). “And do not oppress the poor at the gate,” just as it says: “When you shall conclude to tithe all the tithes of your produce…[and you shall give to the Levite…]” (Deuteronomy 26:12). If you do so3Oppress the poor and not give them their tithes,, “for the Lord will fight their battle” (Proverbs 22:23). “Do not rob the impoverished.” It is speaking of the sons of Kehat. Why does it call them impoverished? It is because they were from the tribe of Levi, which did not take a portion in the Land.

75. 5.3

    Another matter, “do not cut off,” that is what is written: “But the Lord had not spoken to erase the name of Israel from beneath the heavens” (II Kings 14:27). The Holy One blessed be He does not seek that any one of them should die. See what is written: “The foreigner who accompanies the Lord shall not say: [The Lord will separate me from His people]” (Isaiah 56:3). If regarding a foreigner, I said not to disqualify him, all the more so Israel, who are My children. That is, “but the Lord had not spoken to erase…” Likewise, the Givonites, who were unsought proselytes, and were not sincere proselytes, but rather they converted due to fear, and I accepted them. And because Saul sought to confront them and killed the priests who would provide their sustenance, I killed him. Moreover, I brought three years of famine on their account, as it is stated: “There was a famine in the days of David [for three years…the Lord said: For Saul, and for the bloody house, in that he put the Givonites to death]” (II Samuel 21:1). If the Givonites, who came to you, I did not disqualify, will I disqualify My children? That is, “But the Lord had not spoken to erase…” This is true all the more so regarding the Levites, who are servants before Me. That is, “Do not cut off.” “Do not cut off,” that is what is written: “The Lord is good; He is a stronghold on the day of trouble” (Nahum 1:7). The attributes of the Holy One blessed be He are not like the attributes of flesh and blood. A flesh and blood king against whom the province rebelled, he initiates chaos and kills the good with the bad. The Holy One blessed be He is not so. When the generation angers Him, he spares the righteous and eradicates the wicked. The generation of Enosh sinned; He eradicated them, but spared Ḥanokh: “Ḥanokh walked [with God and he is not, as God took him]” (Genesis 5:24). Why? “[He is a stronghold] on the day of trouble and knows those who take refuge in Him” (Nahum 1:7). The generation of the Flood angered Him and He eradicated them, but He spared Noah: “Noah found favor in the eyes of the Lord” (Genesis 6:8). That is, “[He is a stronghold] on the day of trouble and knows those who take refuge in Him.” The people of Sodom angered Him and He eradicated them, but He spared Lot, as it is stated: “It was when God destroyed the cities of the plain…[He sent Lot from the midst of the upheaval]” (Genesis 19:29). That is, “[He is a stronghold] on the day of trouble and knows those who take refuge in Him.” He brought darkness upon the Egyptians, “But all the children of Israel had light in their dwellings” (Exodus 10:23). That is, “[He is a stronghold] on the day of trouble and knows those who take refuge in Him.” Israel departed from Egypt, came to the wilderness, and performed that act,4The making of the Golden Calf. except for the tribe of Levi, as it is stated: “Whoever is for the Lord, to me, and all the sons of Levi gathered to him” (Exodus 32:26). Immediately, Moses stood and killed the sinners by means of the tribe of Levi, as it is stated: “The sons of Levi acted in accordance with the word of Moses, [and some three thousand men fell from the people on that day]” (Exodus 32:28). And the Lord afflicted those who performed the act of the calf, but He did not afflict the tribe of Levi, as it is stated: “The Lord afflicted [the people, because they made the calf that Aaron had made]” (Exodus 32:35). That is, “[He is a stronghold] on the day of trouble and knows those who take refuge in Him.” The Holy One blessed be He said: ‘The tribe of Levi took shelter in Me and sanctified Me with the calf, by right, I should acknowledge them for good and rescue them from trouble.’ That is why He cautioned Moses and Aaron regarding the sons of Kehat, who were Levites, so they would not be eradicated on account of the Ark. That is what is written: “Do not cut off…”

76. 5.4

    Another matter, “do not cut off,” what is written before it? “The Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron” (Numbers 4:17). Rabbi Levi said: What matter does Aaron have, that he is mentioned here? It is, rather, that He is providing an allusion to the sons of Kehat and saying to them: ‘Focus your attention to ensure that you will not conduct yourselves with levity and enter before the Ark. If you conducted yourselves with levity in its regard, learn from the sons of Aaron.’ He said: The sons of Aaron, because they entered without permission, what is written in their regard? “Fire emerged from before the Lord, and consumed them” (Leviticus 10:2). You, too, focus your attention, so what befell the sons of Aaron will not befall you. That is why He wrote: “The Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron.” Our Rabbis say: Why is Aaron written here? It is because when the sons of Kehat were commanded regarding the bearing of the Ark, they became afraid. They began shouting at Moses and saying: ‘We are going to die just as the sons of Aaron died.’ The Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: ‘Just as you instituted a remedy for Aaron [when he enters the Holy of Holies], as it is stated: “With this Aaron shall come into the Holy of Holies” (Leviticus 16:3), so, institute a remedy for the Kehatite families so they will not die.’ That is what is written: “Do not cut off…” “But do this for them, [and they will live, and will not die]” (Numbers 4:19). Do not wonder about this that the Holy One blessed be He instituted a remedy for them so they would not die, as even for the wicked we have found that He instituted a remedy for them so they would not die. When the Holy One blessed be He detailed for Moses the thirty-six instances of karet in the Torah, Moses said before the Holy One blessed be He: ‘Master of the universe, if a person sins in these, will he be eliminated in that way?’ The Holy One blessed be He said to him: ‘Let them be flogged forty lashes and thereby satisfy the obligation of their karet.’ That is what we learned: All those liable to receive karet who were flogged are exempted from their karet, as it is stated: “And your brother shall be debased before your eyes” (Deuteronomy 25:3). Once he is flogged he is as your brother. This is the statement of Rabbi Ḥananya ben Gamliel.5Makkot 23a. If one violates one transgression, his soul is taken for it, one who performs one mitzva, all the more so that his soul will be given to him. Why did the Torah require to flog him with forty lashes? It is because he violated the Torah that was given in forty days, and he caused death to himself, who was formed in forty days.6The fetus, for certains purposes, is not viewed as a child before forty days of development. (Yevamot 69:2) Let him be flogged forty lashes and thereby satisfy the obligation of his karet. Just as it was done to Adam the first man, who sinned and incurred liability to die, and was stricken with forty blows, as the world was cursed forty curses due to his sin: Ten for Adam, ten for Eve, ten for the serpent, and ten for the earth. The Holy One blessed be He extended the day for him, as it is stated: “As on the day that you eat of it you will die” (Genesis 2:17), but he lived nine hundred and thirty years. He did not complete the day of the Holy One blessed be He.7Based on the verse: “As one thousand years in Your eyes are like yesterday gone by” (Psalms 90:4). If for the wicked He instituted a remedy, all the more so for the righteous. That is, “do not cut off…”

77. 5.5

    Rabbi Abba bar Aivu said: It would have been sufficient had it mentioned here only the family alone. Why does it mention the entire tribe, as it says: “The tribe of the Kehatite families [from among the Levites]”? (Numbers 4:18). It is, rather, that the Holy One blessed be He “foretells the outcome from the outset” (Isaiah 46:10), and precedes events that had not yet been done.8Takes into account, in advance, actions that will only take place in the future. The Holy One blessed be He foresaw that Koraḥ would stand from the families of Kehat and dispute with Moses, as it is stated: “Koraḥ, son of Yitzhar, son of Kehat, [son of Levi]…took” (Numbers 16:1), and that Moses was destined to request before the Lord that the earth swallow them. The Holy One blessed be He said to him: ‘Direct your attention, "a remembrance to the children of Israel, so that a non-priestly man will not draw near…[to burn incense before the Lord and he will not be like Koraḥ and like his congregation as the Lord spoke to him at the hand of Moses]”’ (Numbers 17:5).Was the verse lacking anything? What is “to him”?9It would have been sufficient had the verse said: “As the Lord spoke at the hand of Moses.” “To him” seems superfluous. The Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: ‘Regarding him, I will listen to you, but regarding the entire tribe, I will not listen to you.’ That is why it is stated: “Do not cut off…”

78. 5.6

    “The Kehatite,” that is what is written: “For My name's sake, I will defer My wrath and for My praise, I will exercise forbearance with you, so as not to eradicate you” (Isaiah 48:9). It is speaking of Israel. “For My name's sake, I will defer My wrath,” this is Israel, upon whom the Holy One blessed be He designated His name: “I am the Lord your God” (Exodus 20:2). And He joined His name10El. with their name, Israel. That is why He deferred His wrath against Israel, that He did not eliminate them, but rather, He collected from them11He punished them. little by little in exile in order to absolve them. He did not seek to eradicate them, so his name would not be desecrated because of them. As we find when Israel was in Egypt, they rebelled against the Holy One blessed be He and the Holy One blessed be He wished to eliminate them, but He deferred His wrath with them for His name’s sake and did not do so, just as it says: “I said to pour My fury upon them, to spend My wrath upon them within the land of Egypt. But I acted for My name’s sake, so that it would not be profaned before the eyes of the nations” (Ezekiel 20:8–9). Likewise, when Israel departed, in the wilderness they rebelled against Him, and the Holy One blessed be He sought to eradicate them but He deferred His wrath with them for His name’s sake, as it is stated: “I said to pour My fury upon them [in the wilderness to eradicate them. But I acted for My name’s sake, so that it would not be profaned before the eyes of the nations…]” (Ezekiel 20:13–14). Likewise, the generation of the wilderness rebelled against the Holy One blessed be He and He sought to eradicate them, but He deferred His wrath with them for His name’s sake, and He took an oath that He would exact retribution against them with the servitude of the kingdoms, but he did not effect eradication, as it is stated: “I said I would pour My fury [upon them…in the wilderness]. But I restrained My hand, [and I acted for the sake of My name, that it not be profaned]” (Ezekiel 20:21–22). “I also raised My hand [to them in the wilderness, to disperse them among the nations and to scatter them through the lands]” (Ezekiel 20:23). “For My praise, I will exercise forbearance with you” (Isaiah 48:9), so that the name of the Holy One blessed be He will not be profaned through them; He will bring them the sealed redemption, as it is stated: “I will sanctify My great name that was profaned among the nations… I will take you from the nations…[and I will bring you to your land]” (Ezekiel 36:23–24). Another matter, “I will exercise forbearance [oḥotam] with you” (Isaiah 48:9), because Israel was created to recite the praise of the Holy One blessed be He, just as it says: “This people, I formed for Myself; [they will recite My praise]” (Isaiah 43:21). For that purpose, so that His name would be praised in their midst, the Holy One blessed be He seals it [ḥotma] for good. Just as it says: “Place me as a seal [hotam] upon your heart, as a seal upon your arm” (Song of Songs 8:6). That caused them not to be eliminated in exile. That is, “so as not to eradicate you.” Another matter, “for My name's sake, I will defer My wrath” (Isaiah 48:9), it is speaking of the Kehatites [hakehati]. To what is the matter comparable? It is to a king who had a son who joined robbers. They were apprehended and his son was apprehended with them. The king said: ‘What shall I do? Shall I execute the robbers? That is impossible, as my son is with them. For the sake of my son, I will free them now.’ So, the Levites were the bearers of the Tabernacle. The Holy One blessed be He was looking at Koraḥ and his congregation, who were destined to dispute with Moses and Aaron. The Holy One blessed be He said: ‘What shall I do to these? To kill them now is impossible, as they are intermingled with the other righteous ones.’ So as not to harm all of them with the attribute of justice, the Holy One blessed be He took half His name, and added ya [yod heh] to it [the word kehat], the Holy One blessed be He rendered it hakehati, heh at the beginning and yod at the end, that is ya, in order to provide them with protection until their day would come. That is, “for My name's sake, I will defer My wrath…” That is why hakehati is written here.

79. 5.7

    “But do this for them, and they will live, and will not die upon their approaching the Holy of Holies. Aaron and his sons shall come and assign them, each man to his service and to his burden” (Numbers 4:19). “But do this [vezot] for them, and they will live, and will not die….” “But do this for them,” just as it wrote “this [zot]” regarding Aaron, “with this [bezot] Aaron shall come…” (Leviticus 16:3), here, too, zot is written. Just as He instituted a remedy for Aaron, so He did for them: “And they will live and will not die.” The Holy One blessed be He said to them: ‘Institute a remedy for the sons of Kehat so that they will live and will not die upon their approaching the Ark, as were it not for them, Israel would not survive.’ Why? It is because these four families, Gershon, Kehat, Merari, and Aaron and his sons, surround the Tent of Meeting. If Israel were sullied with a matter, and punishment came to emerge from the Tent of Metting due to the Divine Presence, immediately, the sons of Kehat, who were encamped near the Tent of Meeting, would stand and curb it, so it would not emerge against them. From where is it derived? From the verse: “The Levites shall encamp around the [Tabernacle of the testimony, and there shall not be rage against the congregation of the children of Israel]” (Numbers 1:53). Rabbi Pinḥas HaKohen bar Ḥama said: If you do not derive it from here, you have from elsewhere to derive it. When Koraḥ came to dispute Moses, the angel of death came to emerge against Israel and to damage them. Had it emerged, it would have killed all of Israel. Moses was encamped near the Tent of Meeting, as he was a member of the sons of Kehat. He sensed that it sought to emerge against Israel. Immediately, he said to Aaron: ‘“Take the fire pan, and place fire upon it from on the altar…and atone for them” (Numbers 17:11). Quickly, with alacrity, hurry, why are you standing and dallying? “Go quickly to the congregation”’ (Numbers 17:11). Aaron said to him: ‘What have you seen?’ He said to him: ‘I saw the angel of death who emerged to afflict the enemies of Israel:12A euphemism for Israel. “For the rage has emerged from before the Lord”’ (Numbers 17:11). You learn that the Levites would curb the punishments, among them the sons of Kehat, who were the bearers of the Ark. The Holy One blessed be He said to them: ‘They suffer with Israel all this suffering, and you do not institute a remedy for them?’

80. 5.8

    “But do this for them, and they will live, and will not die,” what did the Holy One blessed be He see that led Him to caution with respect to the Kehatite families more than the rest of the families? Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon said, in the name of Rabbi Shmuel ben Rabbi Yitzḥak: There is an outstanding element in the tribe of Levi and the Kehatite families that is not in all of Israel. How so? All the tribes do not care about the Tabernacle vessels, but the tribe of Levi bears the Tabernacle vessels; some bear the boards, some bear the bars, some bear the bases. That is what the sons of Merari bear. The families of the sons of Gershon bear all the woven items, and the families of the sons of Kehat, the Ark. Another matter, to what extent was the tribe of Levi more outstanding than Israel? It was that Israel would walk wearing sandals, but the tribe of Levi, who bore the Tabernacle vessels, would walk barefoot. We have learned that the tribe of Levi was more outstanding than all of the tribes. The most outstanding in the tribe of Levi was the Kehatite family, as a son of Levi would place his burden; the boards, the bars, the bases, and any item, onto the wagons. But the Kehatite families would bear [their burden] on their shoulders, as they did not have permission to place the Ark on a wagon, as it is stated: “But to the sons of Kehat he did not give, [because the sacred service is upon them; they shall bear on the shoulder]” (Numbers 7:9). Regarding one additional matter, they were more outstanding than all the Levites; as all the Levites would bear the Tabernacle vessels and they would walk in their typical manner, facing the road, but the sons of Kehat would walk backward, facing the Ark, so as not to turn their backs to the Ark. You draw the conclusion that even though they were greater than the rest of the families, and it goes without saying than Israel, they were not haughty of spirit, but rather, they were deferential to the Ark. Why so? It is because there is no greatness before God. You draw the conclusion that even though the Kehatite family was aristocratic, when they were coming to bear the Ark, they would bear it like slaves. The Holy One blessed be He said: ‘The Torah is life,’ as it is stated: “It is a tree of life for those who hold it…” (Proverbs 3:18); “For they are life for those who find them and healing for all one's flesh.” (Proverbs 4:22). The sons of Kehat hold the Torah, which is life; this is the Ark which they carry, wherein is the Torah. By right they should live and not die. That is, “and they will live, and will not die…”

81. 5.9

    “Aaron and his sons shall come, and assign them,” from here Rabbi Shmuel bar Rabbi Naḥman would say: Because the sons of Kehat knew that anyone who bears the Ark, his reward is great, they would abandon the table, the candelabrum, and the altars, etc., as it is written above, until “Aaron and his sons shall come…”13This is a reference to paragraph 1. “They shall not come to see as the sacred is being covered, lest they die” (Numbers 4:20). “They shall not come to see as [the sacred] is being covered,” Rabbi Yehuda HaLevi ben Rabbi Shalom said: Do you want to learn under what circumstances the sons of Kehat die? Go out and learn from this verse: “They shall not come to see as [the sacred] is being covered…” It teaches that when they would come to bear the Ark, they would remove the curtain from before it and they would feast their eyes on the Ark. That is why they would be eradicated, as it is stated: “As no man can see Me and live” (Exodus 33:20). How did Moses institute a remedy for them? God said to him: ‘When they dismantle the Tabernacle, do not have the sons of Kehat remove the curtain from before the Ark, but rather, have the sons of Aaron enter and remove it, because they are priests. They will cover the Ark, and likewise, the table, and likewise, all the vessels mentioned to him. Thereby, they will have a remedy, as they will not die if they do not look at the Ark.’ That is what is written: “They shall not come to see as [the sacred] is being covered.” This is the Ark, if they do so. What is “as [the sacred] is being covered”? Rabbi Levi said: If they see the Ark like an eyelid when it closes upon the eye,14Meaning, even for a slight moment. immediately they die. Know this from the people of Beit Shemesh, as it is stated: “He smote among the people of Beit Shemesh because they gazed at the ark of the Lord. He smote among the people…” (I Samuel 6:19). What is “because they gazed at the ark of the Lord”? Rabbi Abahu and Rabbi Elazar, one said: They were reaping and prostrating themselves, and one said: They were speaking extraneous matters. What did they say? Who angered you that you were angered, and who appeased you that you were appeased? Rabbi Levi said: The curtain over the Ark was folded and they saw it. Come and see what a great calamity befell them for this, as it is written: “He smote among the people seventy men, fifty thousand men” (I Samuel 6:19). Rabbi Abahu and Rabbi Elazar, one said: They were seventy men, and each and every one of them was the equivalent of fifty thousand, and one said: They were fifty thousand, and each and every one of them was the equivalent of the seventy [who sat in the] Sanhedrin. Rabbi Ḥanina and Rabbi Mona, one said: “Seventy men,” this is the Sanhedrin, and “fifty thousand men,” as they were the equivalent of fifty thousand men; and one said: “Seventy men,” these are the Sanhedrin, and “fifty thousand men” of the people of the land. Elijah says: They gathered and went out to war. Fifty thousand men of them fell, and a group of the Great Sanhedrin fell with them. Who killed them? That is, it was none other than the people of Beit Shemesh who caused them to be killed because they gazed at the Ark. That is why He cautioned the sons of Kehat: “They shall not come to see as [the sacred] is being covered…” The Holy One blessed be He said: ‘Just as I did to the sons of Kehat because they feared Me, I honored them, accorded them honor, and cautioned them to deliver their lives from death. Similarly, anyone who fears Me, I honor him and I do not cut off his name from the world. From whom do you derive this? It is from the sons of Yonadav ben Rekhav. Because they performed My will, what is written in their regard: “No man shall be cut off, for Yonadav son of Rekhav standing before me all the days” (Jeremiah 35:19). If for those who are proselytes, I did so to them, to Israel, who are the sons of My beloved, the sons of My friend,15Abraham. all the more so; when they perform My will, they will stand before Me all the days,’ as it is stated: “Had you heeded My commandments, your peace would be like a river…[the offspring of your innards…their name would not be excised and not be destroyed from before Me]” (Isaiah 48:18–19). And it says: “But you, who cleave to the Lord your God, all of you live today” (Deuteronomy 4:4).

82. 6.1

    “Take a census of the sons of Gershon as well, by their patrilineal house, by their families” (Numbers 4:22). “Take a census of the sons of Gershon,” that is what is written: “It is more precious than pearls, and all the objects of your desire do not equal it” (Proverbs 3:15). We learned there, a Sage takes precedence over a king of Israel: If a Sage dies, we have no one like him; if a king of Israel dies, all of Israel is fit for kingship. A king takes precedence over a High Priest, as it is stated: “The king said to them: Take with you the servants of your lord, [mount Solomon my son upon my mule, and take him down to Giḥon. Tzadok the priest and Natan the prophet shall anoint him there as king over Israel]” (I Kings 1:33–34).1The verse refers to the king as the lord of Tzadok, the High Priest. A High Priest takes precedence over a prophet, as it is stated: “Tzadok the priest and Natan the prophet shall anoint him there as king over Israel” (I Kings 1:34); Tzadok is before Natan.2Tosefta Horayot 2:8. Rabbi Huna said in the name of Rabbi Ḥanina: A prophet folds his arms and legs and sits before the priest, what is the source? It is written: “Hear now, Yehoshua the High Priest, [you and your colleagues who sit before you]” (Zechariah 3:8). Could it be that they were lay people? The verse states: “As they are men of distinction [mofet]” (Zechariah 3:8), and mofet is nothing other than prophecy, as it is stated: “And he will provide you with a sign or a wonder [mofet]” (Deuteronomy 13:2). A High Priest who was anointed with anointing oil takes precedence over one who was appointed with multiple vestments.3A High Priest could be appointed in two ways. He could be anointed with anointing oil, or he could enter his position by wearing the vestments of the High Priest. Since the High Priest has eight vestments and a regular priest has four vestments, the High Priest appointed by means of wearing the eight vestments is called "the High Priest of multiple vestments." A prophet takes precedence over the priest anointed for war. The priest anointed for war takes precedence over the deputy of the High Priest. The deputy takes precedence over the head of the priestly watch. The head of the priestly watch takes precedence over the head of the patrilineal house. The head of the patrilineal house takes precedence over the overseer. The overseer takes precedence over the treasurer. The treasurer takes precedence over the common priest. The common priest takes precedence over the Levite. The Levite takes precedence over the Israelite. The Israelite takes precedence over the mamzer, the mamzer over the Givonite, the Givonite over the proselyte, the proselyte over the liberated slave. When? It is when they are all equal. However, if the mamzer is a Torah scholar, he takes precedence over a High Priest who is an ignoramus, as it is stated: “It is more precious than pearls.”4Tosefta, Horayot 2:8. They thought to say: To redeem, to sustain, and to clothe [he takes precedence], but for seating, no. Rabbi Avin said: Even for seating. What is the source? “It is more precious than pearls [mipeninim]” – even than the one who enters the innermost sanctum [lifnai velifnim]. Another matter, “it is more precious than pearls,” it is speaking of Kehat and Gershon. Even though Gershon is the firstborn, and we have found everywhere that the verse has accorded honor to the firstborn, because Kehat bore the Ark inside, which was the Torah, the verse gave him precedence over Gershon, as first it said: “Take a census of the sons of Kehat” (Numbers 4:2) and then it says: “Take a census of the sons of Gershon…” (Numbers 4:22). That is, “it is more precious than pearls [mipeninim],” than the firstborn who emerged first. Peninim is nothing other than first, just as it says: “This was formerly [lefanim] in Israel” (Ruth 4:7).

83. 6.2

    “Take a census of…,” that is what is written: “He will not withdraw His eyes from the righteous…” (Job 36:7). The Holy One blessed be He does not withhold from them the realization of their ideal, as we found that Jacob coveted the birthright for the sake of Heaven, so he would be able to sacrifice. He purchased it from Esau with money and the Holy One blessed be He agreed with him, and He called him: “My son, My firstborn” (Exodus 4:22). He granted greatness to the firstborn so they would sacrifice before Him. That is, “He will not withdraw His eyes [einav] from the righteous” (Job 36:7). [Another explanation:] “Einav” is nothing other than in his place [taḥtav], just as it says: “And, behold, the mark maintained its appearance [be’einav]” (Leviticus 13:5). What is taḥtav? These are his children, just as it says: “In the wake of [taḥat] your fathers, your sons will be” (Psalms 45:17). “And kings upon the throne” (Job 36:7), as the Holy One blessed be He accorded honor to the firstborn, and it was fitting for them to take the kingdom, as it is stated: “But the kingdom he gave to Yehoram, because he was the firstborn” (II Chronicles 21:3). Likewise, regarding David it says: “As for Me, I will make him My firstborn, supreme over kings of the earth” (Psalms 89:28). That is, “and kings upon the throne.” “He has seated them forever” (Job 36:7), as they [the Israelite firstborns] would have been fit to take the priesthood and what the Levites perform, had they not sinned in the act of the calf. Initially, the firstborn would sacrifice, as it is stated: “He sent the young men of the children of Israel and they offered up burnt offerings [and they slaughtered feast-offerings of bulls to the Lord]” (Exodus 24:5). Likewise, Jacob said to Reuben: “Reuben, you are my firstborn…[greater in honor [se’et] and greater in power [az]]” (Genesis 49:3). Se’et, this is priesthood, just as it says: “Aaron raised his hands [vayisa] toward the people, and blessed them” (Leviticus 9:22). Az, this is kingdom, as it is stated: “He will give strength [oz] to His king” (I Samuel 2:10). Had Reuben not sinned in the act of Bilha, he would have been worthy to take priesthood and kingdom, because he was the firstborn.. From where is it derived that they were worthy for the service of the Levites? It is as you find that the common Levites entered in place of the firstborn of Israel, as it is stated: “You shall take the Levites for Me, I am the Lord, in place of all the firstborn among the children of Israel” (Numbers 3:41). That is, “he has seated them forever [lanetzach].” This is the status of the Levites that the firstborn were worthy to take, just as it says: “The Levites were counted from thirty years old and above…of these…” (I Chronicles 23:3–4). “To supervise [lenatzeach] the labor of the House of the Lord” (Ezra 3:8). Regarding the tribe of Levi, the verse said: “My eyes are on the faithful of the land; they will dwell [lashevet] with me” (Psalms 101:6). That is “He has seated them [vayoshivem] forever.” “They were exalted” (Job 36:7). Who caused the firstborn to lose this honor? It is because they exalted themselves and worshipped before the calf. Therefore, “if there are those bound in shackles [bezikim]” (Job 36:8), they were prohibited from sacrificing an item that is done in fire.5"An item that is done in fire" refers to a sacrifice. Zikim is nothing other than fire, as it is stated: “Behold, all of you are igniters of fire, [lighters of sparks] [zikot]” (Isaiah 50:11). [“Or trapped in the pangs of poverty” (Job 36:8)], that each and every one of them is obligated to redeem himself with five silver shekels and give them to the Levites. We find regarding the firstborn of Israel that they descended from their prominence because of the act of the calf. But the firstborn of the Levites, who did not err regarding the calf, the priesthood was given to Aaron, who was the firstborn, and the rest of the firstborn Levites required neither redemption nor atonement, and merited Levite status with their brethren. Were a person to whisper to you: ‘Was Gershon not firstborn? Why did the verse give precedence to Kehat in taking a census, and only then counted Gershon?’ You, too, say to him: ‘Because [the family of] Kehat were the bearers of the Ark, which is of the most sacred order, and Aaron the priest, who was of the most sacred order, emerged from him, while Gershon was sacred. That is why the verse gave Kehat precedence. From where do you derive that Gershon did not lose his prominence because he was firstborn? It is as you find just as it is stated regarding Kehat: “Take a census of the sons of Kehat” (Numbers 4:2), so, it is stated regarding Gershon: “Take a census of the sons of Gershon [as well]” (Numbers 4:22). What is it that the verse stated: “As well”? It is so you will not say that it is for this that he counted the sons of Gershon second, because they are inferior to the sons of Kehat. No, rather, “as well” is written; that the sons of Gershon, too, were the equivalent of the sons of Kehat, but the verse gave them precedence here in deference to the Torah. But in other places, it gave precedence to Gershon over Kehat.

84. 6.3

    “By their patrilineal house, by their families,” by patrilineal house, he determined families for him, but not by their matrilineal house. Were the sons of Gershon to marry from among the daughters of Kehat or the daughters of Merari, their sons would be attributed to the families of Gershon. However, were the rest of the families to marry from the daughters of Gershon, their sons would be attributed to the rest of the families. “From thirty years old and above until fifty years old you shall count them: Everyone enlisted to perform a duty, to perform service in the Tent of Meeting” (Numbers 4:23). “From thirty years old and above.” It is taught: A High Priest enters the courtyard for service only if he is anointed for seven [days] and donned multiple vestments for seven [days]. Even if he was not anointed for seven and did not don multiple garments for seven, his service is valid. A common priest enters the courtyard for service only if he brought one-tenth of an ephah of his own and offers it with his own hand. Even though he did not bring one-tenth of an ephah of his own and offer it with his own hand, his service is valid. The son of a Levite enters the courtyard only if he studied for five years, as it is stated: “This is regarding the Levites: From twenty-five years old and above [he shall enlist to perform duty in the work of the Tent of Meeting]” (Numbers 8:24), and elsewhere it is stated: “From thirty years old and above.” (Numbers 4:3) If it is stated “from twenty-five years old,” why is “from thirty years old” stated? If it is stated “from thirty years old,” why is “from twenty-five years old” stated? Rather, all those years between twenty-five years old until thirty years old, he would study. From then on, they draw him near to service. From here they said: Anyone who does not see a modicum of success in his studies within five years, will never see [success]. Rabbi Yosei says: Three years, as it is stated: “To raise them for three years” (Daniel 1:5). One seats an elder in the Chamber of Hewn Stone only if he became a judge in his city. Once he became a judge in his city, they promote and seat him on the Temple Mount. From there, they promote and seat him on the chail.rampart.6The rampart is a section of the Temple Mount which is before the Women's Courtyard. See the Tosefta, Chagiga 2:4, which refers to a beit din on the Temple Mount, in the rampart, and in the Chamber of Hewn Stone. From there, they promote and seat him in the Chamber of Hewn Stone. “Everyone enlisted to perform a duty,” they were gatekeepers. “To perform service in the Tent of Meeting,” they were singers. “This is the service of the Gershonite families, to perform service and for bearing” (Numbers 4:24). “This is the service of the Gershonite families,” and no other; it teaches that it was prohibited for the sons of Gershon to enter into the service of the sons of Merari, in the beams of the Tabernacle, its bars, its pillars, and its sockets. “To perform service and for bearing” – when they would construct the Tabernacle, they would spread the woven strips of fabric in the Tabernacle, the Tent of Meeting. Everything that was in their charge, they would construct. When they dismantled the Tabernacle, they would load it onto the wagons. “They shall bear the woven strips of fabric of the Tabernacle, and the Tent of Meeting, its covering, and the taḥash covering that is upon it from above, and the screen for the entrance of the Tent of Meeting” (Numbers 4:25). “And the taḥash covering that is upon it from above,” in its plain sense. Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish said: Rabbi Meir would say: The taḥash that existed in the days of Moses was a creature unto itself, and the Sages in that generation did not know whether it was a type of beast [chaya] or a type of animal [behema].7Among kosher animals, there are two distinct groups: cattle, referred to as behemot, and animals that are not normally domesticated, referred to as chayot. There are certain halakhik distinctions between them. The Sages did not know which category the tahash belonged to. It had a single horn on its forehead, and it was made available to Moses for that occasion. The Tabernacle was crafted of it, and it was hidden. From the fact that it says: It had one horn on its forehead, we learn from this that it was pure.8Shabbat 28b. “And the screen for the entrance of the Tent of Meeting,” just as it says: “You shall craft a screen for the entrance [of the Tent]” (Exodus 26:36). “And the hangings of the courtyard, and the screen for the entrance of the gate of the courtyard that is by the Tabernacle, and by the altar, all around, and their cords, and all the instruments of their service, and everything that shall be crafted for them, and they shall serve” (Numbers 4:26). “And the hangings of the courtyard,” these are the hangings that they positioned around the courtyard, just as it says: “You shall make the courtyard…likewise, on the north side…the width of the courtyard…fifteen cubits of hangings…and on the second side…” (Exodus 27:9, 11–12, 14–15). “And the screen for the entrance of the gate,” just as it says: “For the gate of the courtyard [a screen]…” (Exodus 27:16). “That is by the Tabernacle, and by the altar, all around.” It is taught: The altar of the burnt offering, its length is five cubits, its width is five cubits, and its height is three cubits, as it is stated: “You shall craft the altar […five cubits length and five cubits width, the altar shall be square, and three cubits its height]” (Exodus 27:1). “[And he crafted] the altar of the burnt offering…[its length was five cubits and its width five cubits square and its height was three cubits]” (Exodus 38:1), this is the statement of Rabbi Meir.9Rabbi Meir's position is that the verses giving the measurements of the altar should be understood literally. Rabbi Yosei said to him: From the fact that it is stated: “Five cubits length and five cubits width,” do I not know that it is square? Why does the verse state: “Shall be square”? Rather, it is stated in order to derive a verbal analogy from it. Here “square” is stated and elsewhere10Regarding the golden altar (Exodus 30:3). “square” is stated. Just as “square” stated elsewhere, its height is twice its width, here, too, its height is twice its width. Rabbi Meir said to him: ‘If as you say, the result is that the altar is five cubits higher than the courtyard hangings.’11The altar is ten cubits high while the courtyard hangings are five cubits high (see Exodus 27:18). Rabbi Yosei said to him: ‘But is it not already stated: “And the hangings of the courtyard, [and the screen for the entrance of the gate of the courtyard that is by the Tabernacle, and by the altar]”? (Numbers 4:26). Just as the Tabernacle is ten cubits, so the altar is ten cubits.’12The phrase: “That is by the Tabernacle, and by the altar” is extraneous. It juxtaposes the Tabernacle and the altar to teach us that just like the height of the Tabernacle was ten cubits, the height of the altar was also ten cubits. “And their cords,” these cords, what would they do with them? They would fold the strips of fabric and the hangings, they would tie them with the cords, and they would place them in the wagons. “And all the instruments of their service,” these are the golden hooks and the bronze hooks with which they would attach the strips of fabric. “And everything that shall be crafted for them, and they shall serve.” Everything that was done for all the vessels, the sons of Gershon would tend to them. “According to the directive of Aaron and his sons shall be all the service of the sons of the Gershonites, for all their burden, and for all their service; you shall assign them all their burden as a commission” (Numbers 4:27). “According to the directive of Aaron and his sons shall be,” this is what they said, that the Holy One blessed be He accorded honor to the firstborn. Just as the service of the sons of Kehat was according to the directive of Aaron and his sons, just as it says: “Aaron and his sons shall come, and assign them, each man…” (Numbers 4:19), so, too, the service of the sons of Gershon was according to the directive of Aaron and his sons. But with regards to the sons of Merari, it is not written: “According to the directive of Aaron and his sons.” “You shall assign them all their burden as a commission.” The verse includes Moses with them, so they13Moses, Aaron and his children. would command them [the Gershonites] to keep watch over everything that they [the Gershonites] bore. “This is the service of the families of the sons of the Gershonites in the Tent of Meeting, and their commission is under the direction of Itamar son of Aaron the priest” (Numbers 4:28). “This is the service of the families of the sons of the Gershonites…” Initially, Aaron and his sons and Moses with them assigned the sons of Gershon regarding their service, their burden, and their commission. From here on, their service and their commission is under the direction of Itamar son of Aaron the priest.

85. 6.4

    “The sons of Merari, by their families, by their patrilineal house, you shall count them” (Numbers 4:29). “The sons of Merari, by their families.” With regard to the sons of Kehat and the sons of Gershon, census [nesiut rosh]14Literally, raising the head. is stated, as the Holy One blessed be He accorded them honor; for Kehat, in deference to the Ark, and for Gershon, because he was firstborn. But the sons of Merari, who were only sons of a later born [son], and the labor of their burden was only beams, bars, pillars, and sockets, “take a census [naso et rosh]” is not stated. “By their families, by their patrilineal house you shall count them.” Why is it stated regarding the sons of Kehat and the sons of Merari: “By their families, by their patrilineal house,” it placed “their families” before “by their patrilineal house,” and regarding Gershon, it placed “by their patrilineal house” first? It is because the nesiut rosh of the sons of Gershon comes from their patrilineal house, but the nesiut rosh of the sons of Kehat is not dependent on their patrilineal house, but rather, on their bearing of the Ark. Likewise, the sons of Merari were from a patrilineal family descended from a later born son. That is why it placed families before patrilineal house. “This is the commission of their burden, for all their service in the Tent of Meeting: The beams of the Tabernacle, its bars, its pillars, and its sockets” (Numbers 4:31). “This is the commission of their burden,” this and none other; it teaches that it is prohibited for the sons of Merari to guard and work what the sons of Gershon guard and bear and work. “The beams of the Tabernacle,” these are the forty-eight Tabernacle beams. “Its bars,” these are the fifteen bars and the middle bar. “Its pillars,” these are the four pillars of acacia wood upon which they spread the curtain and the five pillars of acacia wood upon which they spread the screen of the entrance to the Tent. “And its sockets,” these are the sockets of the beams and the sockets of the pillars, which were one hundred and five sockets. “The pillars of the courtyard all around, their sockets, their pegs, and their cords, with all their instruments and for all their service and by names you shall appoint the instruments of the commission of their burden” (Numbers 4:32). “The pillars of the courtyard all around,” these are the fifty-six pillars that stood surrounding the courtyard, upon which they would spread the hangings. “Their sockets,” these are the fifty-six sockets in which they would stand the pillars, and the four pillars and four sockets upon which they would spread the screen of the entrance to the courtyard. “Their pegs,” these are the pegs of the Tabernacle and the pegs of the courtyard, of bronze, which they would stick into the ground all around, so the wind would not cause the hangings to fall. “And their cords, with all their instruments and for all their service,” with which they would affix the hangings with the pegs, and with which they would tie the pillars and the bars and load them onto the wagons so they would not fall. But for the beams, they crafted iron clasps with which they would secure the beams so they would not fall from upon the wagons. “And by names you shall appoint the instruments of the commission of their burden.” The Holy One blessed be He cautioned them that they should assign all of the Levites, each of them to his service and to his burden so they would not enter into dispute. This is what they would do: So and so will bear beams; so and so will bear bars; so and so will bear pillars, and likewise regarding each and every instrument. “This is the service of the families of the sons of Merari, for all their service in the Tent of Meeting, under the direction of Itamar, son of Aaron the priest” (Numbers 4:33). “This is the service of the families of the sons of Merari….” The sons of Merari, because their role in bearing was not from their patrilineal house,15Since Merari was not the firstborn, the role of the families of Merari role did not stem from the importance of the patrilineal house. that is the reason that it is not stated: “According to the directive of Aaron and his sons shall be” (Numbers 4:27), as it is stated regarding the sons of Gershon. Rather, all their actions were under the direction of Itamar. It teaches that Itamar would take all the vessels and give them to the sons of Merari, and likewise to the sons of Gershon, and he would assign each of them to his service and to his burden.

86. 6.5

    “Moses, Aaron, and the princes of the congregation counted the sons of the Kehatites by their families, and by their patrilineal house” (Numbers 4:34). “Moses, Aaron…counted.” Immediately Moses and Aaron acted, and they counted the sons of the Kehatites first, just as the Holy One blessed be He said to them. From where is it derived that the Holy One blessed be He said to both of them to count them? It is as it is stated: “The Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron saying: Take a census of the sons of Kehat” (Numbers 4:1–2). Why is speech stated regarding Kehat and Gershon, but is not stated regarding Merari?16The verses contain direct speech by God to Moses and Aaron referring to two of the sons (Numbers 4:1-2, 21-22), but only an indirect reference for the third (Numbers 4:29). It is in order to accord honor to Gershon and to liken him to Kehat. Why is Aaron not stated in the speech regarding the sons of Gershon as it is stated regarding the sons of Kehat? It is because Aaron is excluded from all the speeches that were stated to Moses, as the Divine Presence did not speak with Aaron. Why, then, are there several places where Aaron is written? It is not that the speech was with Aaron, but rather, in every portion that relates to Aaron, “Aaron saying” is written. The Holy One blessed be He said to Moses, so that he would say to Aaron. This is why Aaron is written in the speech to the sons of Kehat. It is because every burden of the sons of Kehat and all their service was given to them by Aaron and his sons, as they were not permitted to touch the Ark and all the vessels until Aaron and his sons would cover them, just as it says: “Aaron and his sons shall conclude to cover the sacred [the Ark], [and all the sacred vessels…and then, the sons of Kehat shall come to bear…]” (Numbers 4:15). That is why Aaron is written in the speech regarding the sons of Kehat, as he is commanded regarding their service and their burden. But regarding the sons of Gershon, you do not find that Aaron did anything there; rather, it is under his direction the sons of Gershon would do everything that they do, and their actions were under the supervision of Itamar, as he would assign to each and every one of them his service and his burden. That is why Aaron is not written in the speech in the portion of the sons of Gershon.

87. 6.6

    “And the princes of the congregation [counted] the sons of the Kehatites.” Why are the princes necessary here? Is it not so, that the Holy One blessed be He did not say to Moses that the princes of the congregation should be with him in the census of the Levites? Why did he do so? Rather, this is what Moses said: ‘Since the princes were with me in the census of all Israel, just as it says: “And with you shall be [a man for each tribe, each is the head of his patrilineal house]” (Numbers 1:4), I will not cause them anguish and I will take them with me for the census of the Levites.’ From where is it derived that this is so? You find that after the census of Israel it is written: “These are the counted, that [Moses and Aaron, and the princes of Israel] counted” (Numbers 1:44), but after the census of the Levites, you do not find that the princes are mentioned there, but rather, “whom Moses and Aaron counted” (Numbers 4:37). It is to teach you that the princes of Israel did not count the Levites at the directive of divine speech. But rather Moses took them with him in order to accord them honor.

88. 6.7

    “From thirty [years old and above]” (Numbers 4:35); from here they said: Thirty years old for strength (Mishna Avot 5:21). “Their counted, by their families, was two thousand seven hundred and fifty” (Numbers 4:36). “Their counted, by their families,” this is what they said, that the Ark would kill of the sons of Kehat, as when he counted them from one month old, they were eight thousand six hundred, but when he counted them from thirty years old, not even one third of them were found. “These are the counted of the Kehatite families, all who served in the Tent of Meeting, whom Moses and Aaron counted according to the directive of the Lord at the hand of Moses” (Numbers 4:37). “These are the counted of the Kehatite families,” this is what they said, that the princes did not count with them at the directive of the divine speech, as the princes are not mentioned here. “According to the directive of the Lord at the hand of Moses,” they acted at the directive of the Lord, just as the Holy One blessed be He said to Moses that Aaron should count the sons of Kehat with him, as it is stated: “The Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron saying: Take a census of [the sons of Kehat]” (Numbers 4:1–2). That is why it is stated: “At the hand of Moses,” as Moses said to Aaron, because Aaron was excluded from all the statements in the Torah that were stated to Moses.

89. 6.8

    “And the counted of the sons of Gershon, by their families, and by their patrilineal house” (Numbers 4:38). “And the counted of the sons of Gershon,” just as he counted the sons of Kehat at the directive of the Lord, so he counted the sons of Gershon. “From thirty years old and above until fifty years old, everyone who enlisted for duty, for work in the Tent of Meeting” (Numbers 4:39). “From thirty years old,” in the Tent of Meeting they were disqualified from fifty years and onward, but when they entered the Land of Israel, they were disqualified only on the basis of voice.17Only if their voices were not fit to join the Levites in their song in the Temple service. “Their counted by their families, by their patrilineal house, were two thousand and six hundred and thirty” (Numbers 4:40). “Their counted,” this is what they said, that the sons of Gershon, because they were not among the bearers of the Ark, that is why they were not lacking two-thirds from the first census, but rather, they were one hundred and thirty more than one-third. “These are the counted of the families of the sons of Gershon, all who worked in the Tent of Meeting, whom Moses and Aaron counted according to the directive of the Lord” (Numbers 4:41). “These are the counted of the families….” Why, in the census of the Kehatites, are “the sons of Kehat” not mentioned, just as it is stated regarding the sons of Gershon and the sons of Merari, but “the Kehatite [haKehati]” is written? Because their census was for the purpose of bearing the Ark, the Holy One blessed be He appended His name to theirs, so they would not be eradicated; a heh at the beginning and a yod at the end. That is ya; so as to say that ya will deliver them from death, to realize what is stated: “To deliver them from death” (Psalms 33:19). “Whom Moses and Aaron counted according to the directive of the Lord.” Why is it not stated in the census of the sons of Gershon “at the hand of Moses,” as it is stated in the census of the sons of Kehat? It is because regarding the sons of Kehat, the Holy One blessed be He said to Moses that Aaron should count with Moses. The Holy One blessed be He mentioned Aaron at the beginning of the census with the intent that he should count all the Levites with Moses. However, when Moses heard that the Holy One blessed be He mentioned Aaron in the census of the sons of Kehat but did not mention him subsequently, neither in the census of the sons of Gershon nor in the census of the sons of Merari, Moses thought to himself and said: ‘This is why the Holy One blessed be He said to me, that Aaron should count the sons of Kehat with me; it is because all their burden and all their service is performed under his direction. But the service of the sons of Gershon and the sons of Merari, that are not performed under his direction, He does not want him to count with me.’ That is why he said to Aaron that he should count the sons of Kehat with him, in the name of the Holy One blessed be He, and that is why it is written in the census of the sons of Kehat: “According to the directive of the Lord at the hand of Moses” (Numbers 4:37). But when he came to count the sons of Gershon, Moses did not say to Aaron in the name of the Holy One blessed be He that he should count the sons of Gershon with him, but rather, he accorded him honor because he was his older brother, and took him with him and included him with him for the census. That is why “at the hand of Moses” is not stated. Even though it was the intent of the Holy One blessed be He that Aaron should count all the Levites with him, and it was with that intent that He mentioned Aaron at the beginning of the census, because Moses did not say to Aaron that he should count the sons of Gershon with him in the name of the Holy One blessed be He, he omitted here “at the hand of Moses.”

90. 6.9

    “And the counted of the families of the sons of Merari, by their families, by their patrilineal house” (Numbers 4:42). “And the counted of the families.” Why are “families” stated in the census of the sons of Merari, but not regarding the sons of Kehat and not regarding the sons of Gershon? It is because the sons of Merari were numerous for service. They produced many families, as they were six thousand two hundred, and they increased from thirty years old, one hundred more than half [the number] of [those from age] one month old [to thirty], as you find that from one month old, their number totaled six thousand two hundred, and from thirty years old, their number totaled three thousand two hundred, one hundred more than half.18Those over thirty years of age were more than fifty percent of the total number from one month old and up. But regarding the sons of Kehat, the “families of the sons of Kehat” is not stated, as from thirty years old, not even one-third of those counted from one month old were found. Likewise, “and the counted of the families” was not stated regarding the sons of Gershon, as they, too, those who were from thirty years old did not reach half, as from one month old, they were seven thousand five hundred, and from thirty years old, they were only two thousand six hundred and thirty. “From thirty years old and above until fifty years old, everyone who enlisted for duty, for work in the Tent of Meeting” (Numbers 4:43). “From thirty years old and above until fifty years old,” from fifty years old and above, they were disqualified from standing in the Tabernacle and performing service, because they were incapable of reciting song, however, from fifty years old and above, they could return for the locking of gates. “Their counted by their families were three thousand and two hundred” (Numbers 4:44). “Their counted by their families were three thousand and two hundred.” This is what they said: Because they were a large population fit to perform service, “families” is stated in their regard. “These are the counted of the families of the sons of Merari, whom Moses and Aaron counted according to the directive of the Lord at the hand of Moses” (Numbers 4:45). “These are the counted of the families.” Why is “at the hand of Moses” stated regarding the sons of Merari? Because the Holy One blessed be He saw that Moses did not say to Aaron in the name of the Holy One blessed be He that he should count the sons of Gershon, therefore when he came to count the sons of Merari, the Holy One blessed be He said to Moses: ‘Go and say to Aaron, in My name, that he should count the sons of Merari with him.’ That is why “at the hand of Moses” is stated.

91. 6.10

    All the counted, whom Moses and Aaron and the princes of Israel counted, of the Levites, by their families, and by their patrilineal house” (Numbers 3:46). “All the counted, whom Moses [and Aaron and the princes of Israel] counted….” After calculating the family of the sons of Kehat alone, and the family of the sons of Gershon alone, and the family of the sons of Merari alone, it then included their totals together, to declare that they are all equal before the Holy One blessed be He in terms of affection. “From thirty years old and above until fifty years old, everyone who came to perform the service of work, and the service of bearing in the Tent of Meeting” (Numbers 4:47). “From thirty years old and above until fifty years old, everyone who came to perform the service of work, and the service [of bearing [avodat masa] in the Tent of Meeting].” It is taught: Lack of song invalidates the offering; this is the statement of Rabbi Meir. The Rabbis say: It does not invalidate. Rabbi Elazar said: Rabbi Meir’s source is from this verse: “I have given the Levites, given [to Aaron and to his sons…to perform the service of the children of Israel in the Tent of Meeting], and to atone for the children of Israel…” (Numbers 8:19); just as lack of atonement19One who fails to sprinkle the blood of the offering. disqualifies, so, too, lack of song disqualifies. The Rabbis establish from that verse: Just as atonement is during the day, so, too, song is during the day. Rabbi Yehuda said in the name of Shmuel: From where in the Torah is the requirement of song derived? The verse states: “He shall serve in the name of the Lord” (Deuteronomy 18:7). What is the service that includes the name of the Lord? That is song. Rabbi Naḥman bar Yitzḥak said: From here: “Take up [se’u] song, sound the timbrel; a pleasing lyre with a harp” (Psalms 81:3).20Rabbi Yitzḥak interprets avodat masa as referring to song. Se'u can mean lift up something, and it can mean lift up a voice. Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak said: “They will raise [yisu] their voices, they will sing, for the majesty of the Lord…” (Isaiah 24:14). It is taught: “But to the sons of Kehat he did not give, because the sacred service is upon them; they shall bear [yisa’u] on the shoulder” (Numbers 7:9). From the fact that it is stated: “On the shoulder,” do I not know that “they shall bear [yisa’u]”? Why does the verse state: “Yisa’u”? Yisa’u is nothing other than an expression of song. Likewise it says: “Take up [se’u] song, sound the timbrel…,” and it says: “They will raise [yisu] their voices, they will sing.” Ḥananya, the son of Rabbi Yehoshua’s brother said: From here:21This is another source for the requirement of song. “Moses would speak and God would answer him with a voice” (Exodus 19:19), regarding matters of voice. Rabbi Asa said: From here: “It was when the trumpeters and singers were as one, to sound one voice” (II Chronicles 5:13).22The priestly trumpeters are mentioned in the Torah, and here they are juxtaposed with the singing Levites. Rabbi Yonatan said: From here: “Neither you nor they will die” (Numbers 18:3); just as you23Priests. are involved in the altar service, so too, they are involved in the altar service. Rabbi Yoḥanan said: From here: “To perform the service of work [avodat avoda]” (Numbers 4:47); what is the service [avoda] that requires another service [avoda]? That is song.24Song is sung as an accompaniment to the pouring of the libation of a sacrifice. Thus, it is a service [avoda] which is only performed in conjunction with another service [avoda].

92. 6.11

    “Their counted were eight thousand and five hundred and eighty” (Numbers 4:48). “Their counted were eight thousand and five hundred and eighty.” This is what they said: They counted them separately and they counted them together, like a person who has objects that are fine, excellent, and especially dear to him; he counts them separately and then counts them together, because he rejoices in their substantial number. So, the Holy One blessed be He commanded to write the number of the Levites separately and together, because they were members of His household, upright, and especially dear to him. “According to the directive of the Lord he counted them, at the hand of Moses, each man to his service, and to his burden, and his count was as the Lord commanded Moses” (Numbers 4:49). “According to the directive of the Lord he counted them, at the hand of Moses.” This is said in reference to the sons of Kehat, as Aaron counted the sons of Kehat and said: ‘So-and-so and so-and-so will bear the Ark, and so-and-so and so-and-so will bear the altar, and likewise all the vessels of the most sacred order.’ Just as the Holy One blessed be He commanded Moses that Aaron should perform, so Aaron performed. That is, “at the hand of Moses.” From where do you say that it is regarding the sons of Kehat that the verse is speaking? It is as it is written: “Each man to his service, and to his burden.” So it is written regarding the sons of Kehat: “Aaron and his sons shall come, and assign them, each man to his service and to his burden” (Numbers 4:19). “And his count was as the Lord commanded Moses.” This is said in reference to the sons of Gershon and the sons of Merari, as the Holy One blessed be He commanded that their service should be under his [Moses’] direction, with his brother Aaron. Regarding the sons of Gershon it is written: “You shall assign them all their burden as a commission” (Numbers 4:27), Moses was with them. Regarding the sons of Merari it is written: “And by names you shall appoint the instruments of the commission of their burden” (Numbers 4:32), it included Moses. That is why it is written: “And his count was as the Lord commanded Moses,” as Moses counted and said so-and-so, so-and-so, and so-and-so of the sons of Gershon will bear the woven strips of fabric. So-and-so, so-and-so, and so-and-so will bear the Tent of Meeting, and likewise regarding all the instruments of their service. He would assign the burden of the sons of Gershon by number. Likewise, Moses counted and said so-and-so, so-and-so, and so-and-so of the sons of Merari will bear the beams; so-and-so, so-and-so, and so-and-so of the sons of Merari will bear the bars; and likewise it was regarding all the instruments of the service of the burden of the sons of Merari; he would assign them by number to their service. That is, “as the Lord commanded Moses.” Moses was commanded regarding these two families, the sons of Gershon and the sons of Merari, that he should command them how they should bear and how they should guard what is in their care. That is, “as the Lord commanded Moses.”

93. 7.1

    “Command the children of Israel, and they shall send out from the camp every leper and every zav, and every one impure by means of a corpse” (Numbers 5:2). “Command the children of Israel, and they shall send out from the camp…” – that is what is written: “Remove the dross from silver, and a vessel will emerge for the smith” (Proverbs 25:4). Rabbi Tanḥuma bar Rabbi Abba said: What is “remove the dross from silver”? As long as this waste is in the silver, it does not display its beauty. If one does nothing but filter the waste from it, it immediately displays its excellence. “Remove the dross from silver” – subsequently, “and a vessel will emerge for the smith.” How so? When Israel departed from Egypt, the vast majority of them were blemished. Why? It is because they were toiling in mortar and bricks and would ascend to the top of the structure. One who builds by ascending to the top course, a stone would fall and sever his hand, or a beam or mortar would enter his eye and he would be blinded. They were blemished. When they arrived at Mount Sinai, God said: Is this commensurate with the honor of the Torah, that I will give it to a generation of blemished people? If I wait until others arise, I will delay the giving of the Torah. What did God do? He said to the angels that they should descend to Israel and heal them. Know that it is so. Rabbi Yehuda said that Rabbi Simon said: From where is it derived that there was no one lame among them? As it is stated: “They stood at the foot of the mountain” (Exodus 19:17), and standing is only on one’s feet. From where is it derived that there were no amputees among them? As it is stated: “Everything that the Lord has spoken we will perform” (Exodus 24:7). From where is it derived that there were no deaf among them? As it is stated: “And we will heed” (Exodus 24:7). From where is it derived that there were no blind among them? As it is stated: “All the people saw the sounds” (Exodus 20:15). From where is it derived that there were no mutes among them? As it is stated: “All the people answered” (Exodus 19:8) – you find that they were all healed. If you do not derive it from here, you can derive it from elsewhere. As it is stated: “All the disease that I placed in Egypt [I will not place upon you, as I am the Lord your healer” (Exodus 15:26) – you see that they were healed. However, once they performed that act of the calf, they were restored to their blemish and became zavim1People who became impure due to an emission. and lepers. Thus Moses saw them, as it is stated: “Moses saw the people, that it was wild [farua]” (Exodus 32:25). Parua is nothing other than an expression of leprosy, just as it says: “The leper in whom the mark is…and the hair of his head shall be unshorn [farua]…” (Leviticus 13:45). God said to Moses: Until you crafted the Tabernacle, I would have My words reach you in a temporary manner, and the zavim and the lepers were intermingled with you. Now that you crafted the Tabernacle and I rest My Divine Presence in your midst, separate them from you. “They shall send out from the camp every leper and every zav, and every one impure by means of a corpse.” For what purpose? It is “so that they will not defile their camp, in which I dwell in their midst” (Numbers 5:3).

94. 7.2

    “They shall send out from the camp every leper…” – why is the portion of lepers juxtaposed to the portion of the Levites? You find that Israel and the Levites accepted the kingdom of the Holy One blessed be He upon themselves at Sinai, as it is stated: “All the people answered together” (Exodus 19:8). At the end of forty days, Israel rebelled against the Holy One blessed be He: “They crafted for themselves a molten calf…and said: This is your god, Israel, who took you up from the land of Egypt” (Exodus 32:8). But the Levites were found faultless before the Holy One blessed be He, as it is stated: “Moses stood at the gate of the camp [and said: Whoever is for the Lord, come to me; and all the sons of Levi gathered to him]” (Exodus 32:26). The Holy One blessed be He said: “For those who honor Me, I will honor, but those who scorn Me will be lowly” (I Samuel 2:30). The sons of Levi, who honored Me and did not deny Me, them I honor. But Israel, who scorned Me, as I took them up out of Egypt but they said it was the calf that took them up, by right they should be lowly. With what honor did the Holy One blessed be He honor the Levites? It is that He took them as His portion, as it is stated: “I have hereby taken the Levites from among the children of Israel…[and the Levites shall be Mine]” (Numbers 3:12). When He came to count them to stand in His service, He counted them Himself. From where is it derived that it is so? Rabbi Yehuda bar Rabbi Shimon said: It is written before the portion of the lepers: “According to the directive of the Lord he counted them, at the hand of Moses” (Numbers 4:49), and it says: “And his count was as the Lord commanded Moses” (Numbers 4:49). It is written at the beginning of the matter: “Their counted were” (Numbers 4:36). Rabbi Yehuda bar Rabbi Shimon said: How will the expounder find his bearings between “his count” and “their counted”? If “his count,” why “their counted”? Rather, “their counted” – what Moses and Aaron counted; “His count” – what God counted. Why did God count them? The Holy One blessed be He said: So no man would say: Were Moses and Aaron capable of counting all those multitudes? God said: If you express reproof about them it is as though you are expressing reproof about Me. That is why He wrote: “His count” and “their counted.” How did Moses count them? Rabbi Berekhya said: The Holy One blessed be He would say to Moses: ‘In such and such family there are such and such people,’ until he counted them. That is what is written: “According to the directive of the Lord he counted them, at the hand of Moses.” When Moses counted them from one month old, he counted them at the directive of the Holy One blessed be He, as it is stated: “All those counted of the Levites, [whom Moses and Aaron counted according to the directive of the Lord]” (Numbers 3:39). Rabbi Berekhya HaKohen said: Do you believe that Moses would go and enter the tent of each and every one to see how many sons he had? No, rather God said to Moses: ‘There are two in the tent of so-and-so, and three in the tent of so-and-so,’ until he counted them. From where is it derived? As it is stated: “According to the directive of the Lord.” Thus, He accorded great honor to them in that He Himself counted them. But in the census of Israel, you do not find “according to the directive of the Lord.” Because they did not honor Him, He did not honor them. Likewise, when the Holy One blessed be He came to establish the Tabernacle, He drew the Levites near in His service, as it says in the portion.2This refers to Numbers, chapters 3–4, which describe how the Levites were chosen and what their role was in the Tabernacle. The Holy One blessed be He said: The Levites who honored Me will be with Me, but those who erred with the calf will be afflicted with leprosy, as it is stated: “Moses saw the people, that it was wild [farua]” (Exodus 32:25).3The proof from the verse is explained in Bemidbar Rabba 7:1. Likewise, it says: “I hate the doing of perversity; [it shall not cleave to me]” (Psalms 101:3).4Therefore, other Israelites, who sinned with the calf, were rejected and did not serve in the Tabernacle and Temple.

95. 7.3

    “They shall send out from the camp every leper…” – you find that a king of flesh and blood has nobility; God, too, has nobility, as it is stated: “Take a census of [se’u et rosh]5Literally, elevate them. the entire congregation of the children of Israel…” (Numbers 1:2). A king of flesh and blood has senior officials; God, too, has senior officials: “The prince of the princes of the Levites, [Elazar son of Aaron the priest]” (Numbers 3:32). Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi says: He [Elazar] was an overseer of officials. A king of flesh and blood distributes sustenance to his legions; God, too, distributes sustenance, as it is stated: “Behold, I am raining bread for you from the heavens” (Exodus 16:4). A king of flesh and blood distributes blankets and garments to his soldiers; the same is true of God, as it is stated: “Your garments did not become worn…” (Deuteronomy 8:4). A king of flesh and blood issues a death sentence; God, too, issues a death sentence, as it is stated: “The adulterer and the adulteress shall be put to death” (Leviticus 20:10). A king of flesh and blood exacts fines; God, too, exacts fines, as it is stated: “They shall fine him one hundred silver pieces” (Deuteronomy 22:19). A king of flesh and blood inflicts corporal punishment; God, too, inflicts corporal punishment, as it is stated: “Forty he shall flog him; he shall not add” (Deuteronomy 25:3). A king of flesh and blood has a metal mine to which the banished are exiled; God, too, has a metal mine6This is meant metaphorically; there is a place to which people are banished. to which the banished are exiled, as it is stated: “They shall send out from the camp every leper…”

96. 7.4

    “They shall send out from the camp…” – from where did the leprosy befall them? Rabbi Yehuda bar Rabbi Simon said: Due to the act of the calf. Our Rabbis say: Due to the murmurers;7See Numbers 11:1. according to the opinion of our Rabbis, the leprosy befell them from the murmurers. How so?8The answer to this question appears at the end of the description of the complaints about the manna. When God rained the manna down for them, God performed several miracles for them. Our Rabbis said: They did not need to relieve themselves in the manner of people. Why did He do so? It is, rather, that God said: If My children need to relieve themselves, how, then, did I write in their regard that they are divine, as it is stated: “I had said: You are divine” (Psalms 82:6)? Rather, just as the angels do not need to engage in this matter, they too will no longer need to engage in this matter. Another matter: God said: The nations eat and need to relieve themselves, and how do I distinguish between My children and the nations. That is why they did not need to relieve themselves. What did they do with the good that God performed on their behalf? They began speaking cynically about it. One said to another: Do you not hear, Shimon my brother? That one says: What do you say, Reuven my brother? He said to him: As you live, have you in all your days seen a person placing wheat in a mill, and after they are ground do not flow down?9Namely, the flour does not flow down. We, too, eat the manna, and it does not flow down. His counterpart said to him: I fear that ultimately my stomach will become swollen and burst because we do not excrete it. At that moment, God said to Moses: ‘I cannot bear and restrain Myself: “Until when will [this nation continue to] provoke Me? Until when will they not believe in Me?”’ (Numbers 14:11). Here, it is not written, “with all the wonders that I have performed with them [imo],” but rather, “[with all the signs] that I have performed in their midst [bekirbo]” (Numbers 14:11). Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai said: How many signs and wonders I have performed in their innards [bekirbeihen], but they provoke Me, like the matter that is stated: “And the innards [vehakerev] and the legs…” (Leviticus 1:13).10This verse is brought as a proof that the term bekirbo can mean in their innards. From where is it derived that it would not emerge from them? As it is stated: “Man ate the bread of abirim” (Psalms 78:25).11The term “the bread of abirim” refers to the manna mentioned in the previous verse. Do not read it as abirim, but rather, “the bread of eivarim,” bread that is absorbed in their organs [eivarim]. Nevertheless, Moses advocated on their behalf, and God reconsidered the evil. Then they said to one another: ‘Remember those days when we were in Egypt, when we would cook cauldrons upon cauldrons of meat, and would sit and eat toasts, and would crumble them into the gravy of the meat. If only we had died there, and God had not taken us out of there,’ as it is stated: “If only our death had been at the hand of the Lord in the land of Egypt, when we sat [by the fleshpots, when we ate bread until satiation]” (Exodus 16:3). ‘Now, we have nothing other than this manna alone; so it is in the evening, so it is in the morning, so it is during the week, so it is on Shabbat. If a person celebrated a good day, he has nothing to eat other than manna. If he marks a bad day, he has nothing to eat other than manna. Therefore, the souls are parched,’ as it is stated: “But now our soul is parched; there is nothing at all; [nothing but the manna to look to]” (Numbers 11:6). Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai said: Were they requesting meat? Did they not taste all the delicacies of the world in the manna? Anyone who desired meat would taste it, and anyone who desired fish would taste it. Anyone who desired rooster, pheasant, peacock, or anything that he sought, would taste that. Why, then, were they murmuring? It was, rather, that they sought a pretext for how to return to Egypt. Nevertheless, God said to Moses: What are they requesting? It is meat. Say to them that I will provide them with meat. You will eat of it not only one or two days, but one entire month. That is what is written: “You will eat, not one day…but until an entire month” (Numbers 11:19–20). At that moment, God provided them with meat. Anyone who did not murmur before God would eat it and enjoy it. Anyone who blasphemed before God would eat, and [the meat] would examine him,12The meat would “check” whether the person eating it was a blasphemer. and it would come out of his nose, as it is stated: “Until it comes out of your nose, [and it will be lezara for you]” (Numbers 11:20). Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish says: [The meat will cause] croup. Rabbi Huna HaKohen bar Avin says in the name of Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman in the name of our Rabbis in the Diaspora: [The meat will cause] vomit and excrement. Rabbi Evyatar says: What is lezara? It is a tick, or, that I will introduce a worm into their intestines. Rabbi Aivu bar Nagari says: It will be a warning [le’azhara] for you that from here on they will be forewarned. Rabbi Yehuda bar Rabbi Simon said: What is, “and it will be lezara for you” (Numbers 11:20)? They all became outcasts [zarim], just as it is stated: “No zar may eat of it” (Leviticus 22:13). So, anyone who blasphemes God becomes an outcast. How does he become an outcast? It is, rather, that leprosy befell them. God said to him: Why did they blaspheme Me? They are outcasts from the congregation: “They shall send out from the camp every leper…” According to the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda bar Rabbi Simon, who said: Due to the act of the calf, leprosy befell them, he derives it from this verse: “On the day of your planting you will flourish, [and in the morning your seed will blossom; your branch will be lost on a day of affliction and mortal pain]” (Isaiah 17:11). Our Rabbis say: Forty days after Israel received the Torah, Israel crafted the calf.13For those forty days they were completely devoted to God. From where is it derived? It is as you find that God alluded to this to Moses. God said to Moses: ‘Do you not see Israel, that they are standing and saying: “Everything that the Lord has spoken we will perform and we will heed” (Exodus 24:7); as you live, they are standing in deceit. They are complete with Me only forty days,’ as it is stated: “You shall be for Me [li] a kingdom of priests…” (Exodus 19:6). Was the verse lacking “li”? Lamed is thirty, yod is ten; there is forty. Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai and Rabbi Eliezer ben Yaakov: one of them would say: They were completely devoted for twenty-nine days, and one of them would say: They were completely devoted for eleven days. Both derive it from one verse, as it is stated: “Eleven days from Ḥorev…” (Deuteronomy 1:2). One of them says: What is “eleven”? Moses told them: ‘Was it not that you were completely devoted to God for twenty-nine days, but during the final eleven, you were calculating how to craft the calf,’ as it is stated: “Eleven days…” But his counterpart says: For eleven days they were completely devoted to God, and for twenty-nine they were calculating how to craft the calf. Rabbi Shimon ben Ḥalafta says: They were completely devoted for one day, as it is stated: “The day that you stood before the Lord your God at Ḥorev” (Deuteronomy 4:10). Rabbi Meir says: It is neither in accordance with the statement of these nor in accordance with the statement of those, but even at the moment that they were saying, “Everything that the Lord has spoken we will perform and we will heed” (Exodus 24:7), they were saying one matter with their mouth and one matter with their heart, as it is stated: “But they enticed Him with their mouth and deceived Him with their tongue. Their heart was not true with Him” (Psalms 78:36–37). Even on that very day that they were standing before Mount Sinai, their heart was not true to their Creator. That is what Isaiah says to them: “On the day of your planting you will flourish (tesagsegi)” (Isaiah 17:11) – God said to them: On the day that I sought to render you a plant in My name14Namely, on the day that I established you as My nation., you generated dross (sigim).15Tesagsegi is interpreted as: Make sigim. That is: “On the day of your planting you will flourish.” What is, “and in the morning your seed will blossom” (Isaiah 17:11)? Rabbi Ḥama, Rabbi Ḥanina, and Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥman: one of them said: To what is the matter analogous? It is to a king who had one garden filled with fine and excellent cabbage. He entered into it at dusk and saw it. He said: How fine and excellent; in the morning I will sell it to the merchants and fill my purse with gold pieces. In the morning he entered to see it and found that it had germinated.16Its leaves had spread and it no longer looked fine and excellent. He said to it: May you be cursed; in the evening you were fine and excellent, and in the morning you germinated. So God said to Israel: “And in the morning your seed will blossom [tafriḥi].”17Tafriḥi is interpreted as meaning that the seeds flew out [hifriḥu], which is a sign of deterioration. His counterpart says: It is analogous to one who had a field of flax. He entered into it in the evening, and it was fine. He came to enter in the morning and found that it had become stalks. So, God said to them: “And in the morning your seed will blossom [tafriḥi] (Isaiah 17:11).”18See previous footnote. “On a day of affliction [naḥala]” (Isaiah 17:11) – on a day that I thought to render you an inheritance [naḥala] in My name, you did not sustain My kingdom over you. “And mortal pain” (Isaiah 17:11) – come and receive leprosy. Why does it call it “mortal [anush] pain”? It is because it is an expression of man [gever],19Enosh and gever both mean man. as it is an affliction that overcomes [hagevartanit]. Alternatively, “and mortal pain” – because it causes the body that it enters to decompose; that is why God said to Moses: Separate the lepers that are in their midst as it is they who performed that act. “They shall send out from the camp every leper…”

97. 7.5

    From here, Rabbi Yehuda HaLevi bar Rabbi Shalom said: Leprosy comes due to eleven matters: For cursing the name of God, for illicit sexual relations, for bloodshed, for saying regarding another a [negative] matter that is not accurate, for arrogance, for one who enters an area that is not his, for false speech, for thefts, for a false oath, for one who profanes the name of Heaven, and for idol worship. Rabbi Yitzḥak says: For miserliness. Our Rabbis say: For one who scorns matters of Torah. According to the opinion of the Rabbis, who said: For one who scorns matters of Torah, it is as it is stated: “Therefore, as a tongue of fire consumes straw [and a flame destroys chaff]…their blossom [ufirḥam] will rise as dust; [for they spurned the Torah of the Lord of hosts and scorned the word of the Holy One of Israel]” (Isaiah 5:24). This is leprosy, as it is stated: “If the leprosy shall erupt [paro’aḥ tifraḥ]” (Leviticus 13:12). What is “will rise as dust”? It is like that furnace soot that Moses cast heavenward: “It will become dust over the entire land of Egypt” (Exodus 9:9) – from it the Egyptians were stricken with “a rash erupting in blisters on man and on animal” (Exodus 9:10). According to the opinion of Rabbi Yitzḥak, who said: For miserliness, when a person is miserly and does not lend his utensils, the Holy One blessed be He will afflict his house with leprosy; he takes his utensils outside,20As part of the procedure in cases of leprosy of the house. and the people say: So-and-so, who would not lend his utensils and would say that he did not have utensils, he did have utensils. In his regard the verse states: “The produce of his house will be exiled” (Job 20:28). According to the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda HaLevi, who said: For cursing the name of God, he derives it from Goliath, as it is stated: “For he blasphemed the armies of the living God” (I Samuel 17:36). What is written in his regard? “This day, the Lord will deliver you [yesagerkha] into my hand” (I Samuel 17:46). “Yesagerkha” is nothing other than leprosy, as it is stated: “The priest shall quarantine him [vehisgiro]” (Leviticus 13:5). For illicit sexual relations, from where is it derived? It is as it is stated: “The Lord will afflict with scabs [vesipaḥ] the heads of the daughters of Zion” (Isaiah 3:17). Rabbi Elazar ben Pedat said: Vesipaḥ is nothing other than leprosy, as it is stated: “A spot or a scab [sapaḥat]…” (Leviticus 13:2). For bloodshed, from Cain, as it is stated: “God placed a mark [ot] on Cain” (Genesis 4:15). Rabbi Neḥemya said: This is leprosy. “Ot” is stated here, and “ot” (II Kings 20:8) is stated regarding Hezekiah. Just as ot stated regarding Hezekiah was a rash, so, too, here, it is a rash. If you do not derive it, derive it from Yoav, who shed blood. What is written in his regard? “May there not be eliminated from the house of Yoav a zav or a leper” (II Samuel 3:29). For saying regarding another a [negative] matter that is not accurate, this is [from] Moses, as when God said to him that he should go to Israel, he said to Him: ‘My Master, but they will not believe me,’ as it is stated: “But they will not believe me…” (Exodus 4:1). God said to him: ‘Moses, do you already know that they will not believe you? They are believers, descendants of believers, yet you say to Me, “but they will not believe me…”?’ “Bring your hand to your bosom…” (Exodus 4:6). Immediately, “he withdrew it, and behold, his hand was leprous like snow (Exodus 4:6). For arrogance, this is Naaman, as it is stated: “Naaman, commander of the army of the king of Aram, was a great man […and the man…was leprous]” (II Kings 5:1). What is “great”? It is that he had an arrogance of spirit because he was a great warrior. It is due to this that he was afflicted with leprosy. For one who enters an area that is not his, this is Uziyahu, who sought to enter the area of the priesthood. What is written in his regard? “The leprosy radiated on his forehead” (II Chronicles 26:19). For false speech, this is Miriam, as it is stated: “Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses” (Numbers 12:1). What is written thereafter? “Aaron turned to Miriam, and behold, she was leprous” (Numbers 12:10). For thefts and for a false oath, as it is written: “It will arrive at the house of the thief and at the house of one who takes an oath by My name falsely, […and it will eliminate it and its timber and its stones]” (Zechariah 5:4). What is a plague that destroys timber and stones? This is leprosy, as it is stated: “He shall demolish the house, its stones, and its timber…” (Leviticus 14:45). For one who profanes the name of Heaven, this is Geḥazi, who pursued Naaman in order to take money from him, as it is stated: “Geḥazi pursued Naaman…” (II Kings 5:21). Elisha sanctified the name of the Holy One blessed be He, as he did not wish to take anything from Naaman, but Geḥazi pursued him and took a false oath to him [Naaman] that he [Elisha] had sent him [Geḥazi] to him [Naaman], so that he would send money to him [Elisha]. The result is this one profaned the name of Heaven, which Elisha had sanctified. The Holy One blessed be He said to Geḥazi: ‘Wicked one; you said: “As the Lord lives, I will run after him and take something [me’uma] from him” (II Kings 5:20). You took an oath in My name in order to profane it? You said me’uma; you will take his blemish [mum]’: “the leprosy of Naaman will cleave to you” (II Kings 5:27). And for idol worship, this is Israel; when they performed that act21The sin of the Golden Calf. In section 4 the midrash derives that Israel became lepers after the sin. they became lepers, as it is stated: “Moses saw the people, that it was wild [farua]” (Exodus 32:25). And it says: “And mortal pain” (Isaiah 17:11) – that is why God said to Moses: ‘Separate the lepers who are in your midst from the camp of Israel, as it is they who performed that act.’ “They shall send out from the camp every leper.”

98. 7.6

    Rabbi Yosei HaGelili said: Come and see how severe is the power of transgression, as until they transgressed, there were no zavim and lepers in their midst. Once they transgressed, there were zavim and lepers in their midst. According to our approach, we learned that these three matters22The presence of zavim, the presence of lepers, and death. The verse also mentions people who are impure because they came in contact with somebody who died. From the giving of the Torah until the sin of the Golden Calf, the angel of death was suspended and did not take any lives. occurred on that very day.23Sifrei, Naso 1.

99. 7.7

    “Command [tzav] the children of Israel” – anywhere that command [tzav] is stated, the command is immediately at the time of the action and is practiced throughout the generations. Rabbi Yehuda ben Beteira says: Command [tzivui] is everywhere nothing other than exhortation, as it is stated: “Command Joshua and encourage him [and exhort him]” (Deuteronomy 3:28). According to our approach we learned that one encourages only the encouraged and one exhorts only the exhorted. Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai says: Command, everywhere, involves monetary loss,24Monetary loss means that fulfilling the commandment requires spending money. as it is stated: “Command the children of Israel and they shall take to you pure olive oil” (Leviticus 24:2); “command the children of Israel and they shall send out”; “command the children of Israel and they shall give to the Levites” (Numbers 35:2); “command the children of Israel and say to them: My offering” (Numbers 28:2). Command, everywhere, always involves monetary loss, except for one. Which is that? “Command the children of Israel and say to them that you are coming to the land, Canaan” (Numbers 34:2), which addresses the matter of the division of the land. Rabbi [Yehuda HaNasi] says: Command, everywhere, is nothing other than admonition, as it is stated: “God commanded the man…but of the tree of knowledge of good and evil [you shall not eat]” (Genesis 2:16–17).

100. 7.8

     “And they shall send out from the camp” – from the camp of the Divine Presence. It teaches that lepers and those impure due to corpses are sent out of there. “Leper” – this is a quarantined one;25He is in quarantine until it is determined whether he is a leper. See Leviticus 13:1–8. “every leper” – this is a confirmed one. “Zav” – this is a full-fledged zav; “every zav” – to include a zav who experienced two sightings; “and every zav” – to include a zav who experienced one sighting. “Impure by means of a corpse” – this is a person, who can be sent out; “every one impure” – to include vessels that come in contact with a corpse; “and every one impure” – to include vessels that come in contact with a [dead] creeping animal. Some say: “Impure by means of a corpse” – these are a person and vessels that come in contact [with a corpse]; “every one impure” – to include those who come in contact with a [dead] creeping animal. “Male and female alike you shall send out, outside the camp you shall send them, and they shall not impurify their camp, in which I dwell in their midst” (Numbers 5:3). “Male and female alike” – is the verse referring to all people or is it speaking only of the Levites, bearers of the Ark? The verse states: “Male and female alike you shall send out” – the verse is referring to all people. “Male and female alike” – both adults and children are denoted; “male” – who immersed on that day, “and female alike” – to include one lacking atonement.26There are three stages in purification of lepers and zavim: Immersion, sunset, and sacrificing offerings. After immersion, the person may eat second tithe. After sunset, if he is a priest, he may partake of teruma. After sacrificing the offerings, the person is no longer lacking atonement, and it is permitted for the person to partake of sacrificial food. “And they shall not impurify their camp” – shall all of them, perhaps, be sent outside of one camp? It says: “Command the children of Israel, and they shall send out from the camp” – it includes here one camp. “Outside the camp you shall send them” – it includes here two camps. “And they shall not impurify their camp” – it includes here three camps. From here they said: They are three camps: The Israelite camp, the Levite camp, and the camp of the Divine Presence. From the entrance to Jerusalem to the Temple Mount is the Israelite camp; from the entrance to Temple Mount until the courtyard is the Levite camp; from the entrance to the courtyard and inward is the camp of the Divine Presence.27Tosefta, Kelim, Bava Kama 1:10. Shall they, perhaps, be sent out to the same place? The verse states regarding the leper: “He shall dwell in isolation; his dwelling is outside the camp” (Leviticus 13:46). Everything that a zav impurifies, a leper impurifies. The leper is more severe, as he impurifies through entry.28When he enters a structure, everything under that roof becomes impure. Everything that one impure due to a corpse impurifies, the zav impurifies. The zav is more severe, as he impurifies beneath a very heavy stone.29If he sits on an object, even if it is an object that cannot become ritually impure, and beneath that object is a vessel, even though the weight of the zav has no effect on the vessel, it becomes ritually impure. Everything that one who immersed that day impurifies, one impure due to a corpse impurifies. One impure due to a corpse is more severe, as he impurifies a person. Everything that one lacking atonement disqualifies, one who immersed on that day disqualifies.30Disqualification is the term used when a person or a vessel impurifies another item but that item does not transmit the impurity to another item. The one who immersed on that day is more severe, as he disqualifies teruma. From here the Sages instituted partitions: There are ten sanctities: The Land of Israel is more sacred than all the lands. How is its sanctity manifest? It is, that one brings the omer, first fruits, and two loaves from it, which is not so regarding all the lands. The land of Canaan is more sacred than the east bank of the Jordan. The land of Canaan is fit to serve as an abode for the Divine Presence, and the east bank of the Jordan is not fit to serve as an abode for the Divine Presence. A walled city is more sacred than the Land [of Israel], as lepers can walk throughout the Land [of Israel], but do not walk in walled cities. Jerusalem is more sacred than walled cities, as offerings of lesser sanctity and second tithe are eaten in Jerusalem but are not eaten in walled cities. The Temple Mount is more sacred than Jerusalem, as zavim and zavot enter Jerusalem but do not enter the Temple Mount. The rampart is more sacred than the Temple Mount, as zavim and one impure due to a corpse enter the Temple Mount but do not enter the rampart. The Women’s Courtyard is more sacred than it, as one who immersed that day does not enter there, but they do not incur liability to bring a sin offering.31This is referring to one who immersed that day who then entered the rampart or the Women’s courtyard. The Israelite courtyard is more sacred than it, and those lacking atonement enter the Women’s Courtyard but do not enter the Israelite Courtyard. Israelites for whom the sun has set32These are Israelites who immersed themselves on the final day of their impurity and waited until the evening. At that point they are pure without any impurity. enter the Priestly Courtyard to an area eleven cubits width by one hundred and thirty-five cubits length, but they did not stand on the podium. Levites would stand on the podium but would not enter from there inward. Priests who were blemished, or with the hair on their heads unshorn, or who were intoxicated with wine would enter from there inward, but would not enter between the Entrance Hall and the altar, not to the Entrance Hall, not to the Sanctuary, and not within the four cubits surrounding the altar. The rest of the priests would enter the Entrance Hall, the Sanctuary, and within the four cubits surrounding the altar, but they would not enter the chamber of the Holy of Holies. The High Priest would enter the chamber of the Holy of Holies four times on Yom Kippur. Rabbi Yosei said: In five respects, the area between the Entrance Hall and the altar was equal to the Sanctuary: One with the hair on their heads unshorn, or those who were intoxicated with wine, or one who had not washed his hands and his feet would not enter there; and just as everybody was required to leave the Sanctuary during the burning of the incense, so they would be required to leave the area between the Entrance Hall and the altar during the burning of the incense.33Four are listed here. The fifth respect is that blemished priests would not enter into either area. In what way was the Sanctuary superior to the area between the entrance Hall and the altar? It is, rather, that one may enter between the Entrance Hall and the altar for the purpose of service and not for the purpose of service, but into the Sanctuary one may enter only for the purpose of service. Just as in the wilderness there were three camps, the Camp of the Divine Presence, the Levite Camp, the Israelite Camp, so there were in Jerusalem. From the entrance to Jerusalem until the entrance to Temple Mount was the Israelite Camp; from the entrance to Temple Mount until the Nikanor Gate was the Levite camp; from the Nikanor Gate and inward was the Camp of the Divine Presence, and this [area] was the equivalent of the [area] within the hangings [of the courtyard] in the wilderness. During the journeys the camps did not have sacred status, and one would not incur liability for them due to impurity.34When Israel journeyed in the wilderness, the impure were allowed into the camp. See Menaḥot 95 a–b. “They shall not impurify their camp” – why is it stated? Because it says: “They shall send out from the camp” (Numbers 5:2) – I hear that they should touch neither the Ark nor the bearers, but they should designate a place for them in and of themselves?35The suggestion is perhaps that the impure should be in a designated area in the camp to ensure that they do not touch the Ark or the Levites who carry the Ark, but that they do not have to be sent entirely out of the camp. The verse states: “They shall not impurify their camp.” “In which I dwell in their midst” – Israel are beloved, as even though they are impure, the Divine Presence is in their midst, as it is stated: “That dwells with them in the midst of their impurity” (Leviticus 16:16). And it says: “They shall not impurify their camp [in which I dwell in their midst].” And it says: “You shall not impurify the land [in which you live, in the midst of which I dwell; for I the Lord dwell in the midst of the children of Israel]” (Numbers 35:34).

Next → — showing 1–100 of 444

The Sefaria Midrash Rabbah, 2022. Via Sefaria (sefaria.org), Sefaria-Export. Version source: https://www.sefaria.org/texts Licence: CC-BY. Source.